Research Article

Is there a difference in 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels between female university students with and without joint hypermobility?

Volume: 5 Number: 4 July 4, 2019
EN

Is there a difference in 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels between female university students with and without joint hypermobility?

Abstract

Objectives: Individuals with joint hypermobility (JH) constitute a sensitive group with regard to musculoskeletal problems. This study aimed to investigate whether females with generalized joint hypermobility (GJH) are at risk of hypovitaminosis D compared with non-GJH female participants and whether there is a relationship between vitamin D levels, Beighton score and musculoskeletal complaints.

Methods: In this cross-sectional, descriptive and case-control study, 76 female participants aged 18-25 years were included. The Beighton score with a cut-off of 4/9 was applied for defining GJH. In addition, serum biochemical (the enzymatic colorimetric method) and hormonal (the electrochemiluminescence method) parameters were evaluated.

Results: The mean serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) levels of GJH (n = 38) and non-GJH (n = 38) groups were 15.70 ± 7.96 ng/mL and 16.80 ± 5.45 ng/mL, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of biochemical and hormonal parameters. We found vitamin D deficiency in 89.5% of participants with GJH, and 84.2% of controls. There was no correlation between vitamin D, Brighton criteria, and musculoskeletal complaints.

Conclusion: The female participants with GJH showed similar frequency of musculoskeletal complaints and similar low level of 25(OH)D in relation to controls. 

Keywords

References

  1. [1] Beighton P, De Paepe A, Steinmann B, Tsipouras P, Wenstrup RJ. Ehlers-Danlos syndromes: revised nosology. Villefranche, 1997. Ehlers-Danlos National Foundation (USA) and Ehlers-Danlos Support Group (UK). Am J Med Genet 1988;77:31-7.
  2. [2] Castori M, Tinkle B, Levy H, Grahame R, Malfait F, Hakim A. A framework for the classification of joint hypermobility and related conditions. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 2017;175:148-57.
  3. [3] Malfait F, Francomano C, Byers P, Belmont J, Berglund B, Black J, et al. The 2017 international classification of the Ehlers-Danlos syndromes. Am J Med Genet 2017;175:8-26.
  4. [4] Wintermeyer E, Ihle C, Ehnert S, Stöckle U, Ochs G, de Zwart P, et al. Crucial role of vitamin D in the musculoskeletal system. Nutrients 2016;8. pii:E319.
  5. [5] Rombaut L, Scheper M, De Wandele I, De Vries J, Meeus M, Malfait F, et al. Chronic pain in patients with the hypermobility type of Ehlers–Danlos syndrome: evidence for generalized hyperalgesia. Clin Rheumatol 2015;34:1121-9.
  6. [6] Eller-Vainicher C, Bassotti A, Imeraj A, Cairoli E, Ulivieri FM, Cortini F, et al. Bone involvement in adult patients affected with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. Osteoporosis Int 2016;27:2525-31.
  7. [7] Gulbahar S, Sahin E, Baydar M, Bircan C, Kizil R, Manisali M, et al. Hypermobility syndrome increases the risk for low bone mass. Clin Rheumatol 2006;25:511-4.
  8. [8] Scheper MC, de Vries JE, de Vos R, Verbunt J, Nollet F, Engelbert RH. Generalized joint hypermobility in professional dancers: a sign of talent or vulnerability? Rheumatology 2013;52:651-8.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Health Care Administration

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

July 4, 2019

Submission Date

March 30, 2018

Acceptance Date

May 19, 2018

Published in Issue

Year 2019 Volume: 5 Number: 4

AMA
1.Tuna F, Özdemir H, Demirbağ Kabayel D, Doğanlar ZB. Is there a difference in 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels between female university students with and without joint hypermobility? Eur Res J. 2019;5(4):576-581. doi:10.18621/eurj.411056

Cited By