Research Article

The efficacy of homeopathic Arnica montana 200 CH on dental surgical treatments: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study

Volume: 5 Number: 5 September 4, 2019
EN

The efficacy of homeopathic Arnica montana 200 CH on dental surgical treatments: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this placebo-controlled study was to assess the efficacy of single dose homeopathic Arnica montana 200 CH in dental surgeries.

Methods: The study included 79 patients undergoing wisdom teeth extractions, implant placements, cystectomies, augmentation procedures, alveoloplasties, lefort-1 osteotomies at Istanbul Medipol University’s Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. The patients were randomly divided into two groups using a computer program. Three globulesof Arnica montana 200 CH were administered in the sublingual area in the patients group 1, and glucose globules were administered in the sublingual area in the patients into group 2. After each patient’s surgical operation, the surgeoncompleted a survey about operation time and scope. In addition,a self-assessment survey was completed by the patients the day after their operationsto evaluate their post-operational swelling and pain.

Results: Arnica montana did not appear to significantly prevent post-operative swelling and pain when compared to the placebo (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: This study showed that the use of Arnica montana before a physically traumatic procedure is not more effective than the use of a placebo. However, the results should be evaluated in other studies, including the administration of Arnica montana after a physically traumatic procedure to clearly demonstrate its homeopathic efficiency. 

Keywords

References

  1. [1] Baker DG, Myers SP, Howden I, Brooks L. The effects of homeopathic Argentum nitricum on test anxiety. Complement Ther Med 2003;11:65-71.
  2. [2] Conforti A, Bellavite P, Bertani S, Chiarotti F, Menniti-Ippolito F, Raschetti R. Rat models of acute inflammation: a randomized controlled study on the effects of homeopathic remedies. BMC Complement Altern Med 2007;7:1.
  3. [3] Brikhaus B, Wilkens JM, Lüdke R, Hunger J, Witt CM, Willich SN. Homeopathic Arnica therapy in patients receiving knee surgery: result of three randomized double-blind trials. Complement Ther Med 2006;14:237-46.
  4. [4] Eames S, Darby P. Homeopathy and its ethical use in dentistry. Br Dent J 2011;210:299-301.
  5. [5] Linde K, Clausius N, Ramirez G, Melchart D, Eitel F, Hedges LV, et al. Are the clinical effects of homeopathy placebo effects? A meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials. Lancet 1997;350:834-43.
  6. [6] Kaziro GS. Metronidazole (Flagyl) and Arnica montana in the prevention of post-surgical complications, a comparative placebo controlled clinical trial. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1984;22:42-9.
  7. [7] Mathie RT, Farrer S. Outcomes from homeopathic prescribing in dental practice: a prospective, research-targeted pilot study. Homeopathy 2007;96:74-81.
  8. [8] Varley P. What do homeopathic dentists do? Homeopathy 2007;96:72-3.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Health Care Administration

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

September 4, 2019

Submission Date

April 20, 2018

Acceptance Date

October 2, 2018

Published in Issue

Year 1970 Volume: 5 Number: 5

AMA
1.Erkan E, Parpar K, Develi T, Gündoğar M, Gürler G. The efficacy of homeopathic Arnica montana 200 CH on dental surgical treatments: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Eur Res J. 2019;5(5):793-799. doi:10.18621/eurj.417262

Cited By