Frequency of physical therapy in knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Objectives: This study is conducted to compare the three different frequency of the physical therapy application for knee osteoarthritis in female patients.
Methods: Consecutive 89 female patients with knee osteoarthritis were randomized into three groups of physical therapy as twice-daily, once-a-day and alternate day, by computerized random number generator. We used Visual Analog Scale (VAS); to determine pain level, Western Ontario McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC); to determine osteoarthritis (OA) severity, 10-meter walking test (WD); to determine walking speed and Short Form (SF-36) questionnaire; to determine the quality of life. All groups received a total of 10 physical therapy sessions including hot pack, therapeutic ultrasound (US) and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). We evaluated subjects at the beginning, at the end of treatment and at the third month control at post-treatment period.
Results: Improvement was observed in all groups after treatment (p < 0.05). While there was no significant difference in once-a-day treatment group at 3rd month control (p > 0.05), alternate day group showed a significant improvement (p < 0.05).
Conclusions: In the treatment of knee osteoarthritis, usually once-a-day physical therapy approach is preferred in daily practice. Alternatively twice a day or alternate day therapies can be applicable.
Keywords
References
- [1] Bennell KL, Hunter DJ, Hinman RS. Management of osteoarthritis of the knee. BMJ 2012;345:e4934.
- [29] Rutjes AW, Nüesch E, Sterchi R, Jüni P. Therapeutic ultrasound for osteoarthritis of the knee or hip. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;1:CD003132.
- [30] Huang MH, Lin YS, Lee CL, Yang RC. Use of ultrasound to increase effectiveness of isokinetic exercise for knee osteoarthritis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86:1545-51.
- [2] Cimmino MA, Sarzi-Puttini P, Scarpa R, Caporali R, Parazzini F, Zaninelli A, et al. Clinical presentation of osteoarthritis in general practice: determinants of pain in Italian patients in the AMICA study. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2005;35:17-23.
- [3] Elders MJ. The increasing impact of arthritis on public health. J Rheumatic 2000;60:6-8.
- [4] Fernandes L, Hagen KB, Bijlsma JW, Andreassen O, Christensen P, Conaghan PG, et al; European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR). EULAR recommendations for the non-pharmocolagical core management of hip and knee osteoarthristis. Ann Rheum Dis 2013;72:1125-35.
- [5] Yildiz SK, Özkan FÜ, Aktaş I, Silte AD, Kaysin MY, Badur NB. The effectiveness of ultrasound treatment for the management of knee osteoarthritis: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study. Turk J Med Sci 2015;45:1187-91.
- [6] McAlindon TE, Bannuru RR, Sullivan MC, Arden NK, Berenbaum F, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, et al. OARSI guidelines for the non-surgical management of knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2014;22:363-88.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Rheumatology and Arthritis, Rehabilitation
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Sadiye Murat
*
0000-0002-6544-7095
Türkiye
Zeliha Gençoğlu
This is me
0000-0003-1853-5890
Türkiye
Afitap İçağasıoğlu
This is me
0000-0003-4612-4634
Türkiye
Nur Kesiktaş
0000-0002-3937-9973
Türkiye
Turgay Altınbilek
This is me
0000-0003-1119-0797
Türkiye
Publication Date
September 4, 2019
Submission Date
May 4, 2018
Acceptance Date
November 20, 2018
Published in Issue
Year 2019 Volume: 5 Number: 5