Evaluation of the effects of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy on weight loss
Abstract
Objectives: Obesity has become one of the most serious and ever increasing health problems of our times. Diet, exercise and medical treatment have proven to be insufficient. Operations such as laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) have gained popularity. The purpose of this study is to conduct a retrospective comparative analysis of the clinical results gained from patients treated with LSG and LAGB due to morbid obesity.
Methods: The patients included in the study were selected among those who were diagnosed with morbid obesity and were operated with LAGB (n = 55) and LSG (n = 52) from May 2007 to December 2012. Both groups were compared in terms of the demographic characteristics, preoperative and postoperative conditions.
Results: The groups were similar in terms of age, sex and BMI. In the 6th month, there was a notable loss of appetite in the LSG group patients compared to the LAGB patients (69.2% vs. 23.6%, p < 0.001). The rate of excess weight loss in the LAGB group was 23.93% ± 7.98% and 31.7% ± 7.49% in the LSG group in the postoperative 6th months (p = 0.002). The rate of excess weight loss was 45.36% ± 10.92% in the LAGB group and 60.3% ± 9.81% in the LSG group in the postoperative 12th months (p ˂ 0.001).
Conclusions: When the two surgical operations for morbid obesity are compared LSG is found to be a more successful method in terms of body weight loss. Nevertheless, longer hospitalization can be associated with the technically more complicated nature of the operation and the fact that it requires resection.
Keywords
References
- 1. Shi X, Karmali S, Sharma AM, Birch DW. A review of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity. Obes Surg 2010;20:1171-7.
- 2. Padwal RS, Pajewski NM, Allison DB, Sharma AM. Using the Edmonton obesity staging system to predict mortality in a population-representative cohort of people with overweight and obesity. CMAJ 2011;183:E1059-66.
- 3. Li Z, Bowerman S, Heber D. Health ramifications of the obesity epidemic. Surg Clin North Am 2005;85:681-701.
- 4. Samuel I, Mason EE, Renquist KE, Huang YH, Zimmerman MB, Jamal M. Bariatric surgery trends: an 18-year report from the International Bariatric Surgery Registry. Am J Surg 2006;192:657-62.
- 5. Varela JE. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding for the treatment severe obesity in high risk patients. JSLS 2011;15:486-91.
- 6. Chapman AE, Kiroff G, Game P, Foster B, O'Brien P, Ham J, et al. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in the treatment of obesity: a systematic literature review. Surgery 2004;135:326-51.
- 7. Boza C, Gamboa C, Perez G, Crovari F, Escalona A, Pimentel F, et al. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding LAGB: surgical results and 5-year follow-up. Surg Endosc 2011;25:292-7.
- 8. Hii MW, Lake AC, Kenfield C, Hopkins GH. Laparoscopic conversion of failed gastric banding to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Short-term Follow-up and technical considerations. Obes Surg 2012;22:1022-8.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Surgery , Endocrinology , Primary Health Care
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Emre Gündoğdu
0000-0002-2756-1372
Türkiye
Münevver Moran
0000-0001-8520-7438
Türkiye
Cem Emir Güldoğan
0000-0003-0634-5619
Türkiye
Evren Dilektaşlı
0000-0003-4357-0516
Türkiye
Mehmet Mahir Özmen
This is me
0000-0003-0649-0111
Türkiye
Publication Date
January 4, 2020
Submission Date
July 31, 2018
Acceptance Date
February 28, 2019
Published in Issue
Year 1970 Volume: 6 Number: 1