Evaluation of the parental satisfaction of developmentally delayed pediatric patients undergoing dental surgery with the ''pediatric anesthesia parent satisfaction (PAPS)'' survey
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of the present study was to assess parental satisfaction of developmentally delayed pediatric patients undergoing dental surgery and compare this to satisfaction with anesthesia care for children without developmentally delayed.
Methods: Therefore, two different groups were approached and compared to matching controls. ''Pediatric anesthesia parent satisfaction (PAPS)'' survey was used to evaluate parental satisfaction in the present study. The PAPS survey was administered to 50 parents of developmentally delayed pediatric patients (Group I) and 30 parents of children without developmentally delayed (Group II). However, due to the shortcomings in the questionnaires, 5 participants from Group I and 4 from Group II were excluded from the study.
Results: In the ''Before anesthesia'', ''After anesthesia'', ''Hospital team'' and ''Anesthesia team'' parts of survey no statistically significant difference was found between the groups. In the ‘‘Before anesthesia’’ part the lowest score was given in response to Q5 item (The anesthesia team explained to me how my child might feel physically and emotionally after anesthesia and surgery). The mean score of Q5 item was 2.73 ± 1.77 in Group I and 2.36 ± 1.40 in Group II.
Conclusions: In conclusion, it was found that there is no difference between parental satisfaction of children with developmentally delayed and parental satisfaction of developmentally delayed pediatric patients.
Keywords
References
- 1. Kassmann BP, Docherty SL, Rice HE, Bailey DE Jr, Schweitzer M. Telephone follow-up for pediatric ambulatory surgery: parent and provider satisfaction. J Pediatr Nurs 2012;27:715-24.
- 2. Bolus R, Pitts J. Patient satisfaction: the indispensable outcome. Manag Care 1999;8:24-8.
- 3. Greenfield S, Kaplan S, Ware JE Jr. Expanding patient involvement in care. Effects on patient outcomes. Ann Intern Med 1985;102:520-8.
- 4. Kaplan SH, Greenfield S, Ware JE Jr. Assessing the effects of physician-patient interactions on the outcomes of chronic disease. Med Care 1989;27(3 Suppl):S110-27.
- 5. Eagle CJ, Davies JM. Current models of “quality” – an introduction for anesthetists. Can J Anaeth 1993;40:851-62.
- 6. Darby C, Hays RD, Kletke P. Development and evaluation of the CAHPS Hospital Survey. Health Serv Res 2005;40:1973-6.
- 7. Giordano LA, Elliot MN, Goldstein E, Lehrman WG, Spencer PA. Development, implementation and public reporting of the HCHAPS survey. Med Care Res Rev 2010;67:27-37.
- 8. https:// www.cms.gov/ Medicare/ Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-instruments/ HospitalQualityInits/ HospitalHCAHPS. html. Accessed 1 August, 2015.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Anaesthesiology , Health Care Administration
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Mehmet Sargın
*
0000-0002-6574-273X
Türkiye
Hatice Toprak
This is me
0000-0001-6890-3474
Türkiye
Jale Bengi Çelik
This is me
0000-0003-2167-9967
Türkiye
Publication Date
May 4, 2020
Submission Date
November 22, 2018
Acceptance Date
May 14, 2019
Published in Issue
Year 1970 Volume: 6 Number: 3