Research Article

Effect of anatomic fibula on tibia union and alignment after intramedullary nailing of tibia shaft fractures

Volume: 6 Number: 4 July 4, 2020
EN

Effect of anatomic fibula on tibia union and alignment after intramedullary nailing of tibia shaft fractures

Abstract

Objectives: The effect of an intact or fixated fibula on tibial union and alignment in tibial shaft fractures applied with intramedullary nailing is investigated.

Methods: A retrospective examination was made of 67 patients aged 19-85 years who were applied with intramedullary nailing for a tibial shaft fracture (AO-42) between January 2010 and December 2016. The 44 patients included in the study were separated into 2 groups as those with anatomic fibula (Group 1, n = 12) and those with a fibula fracture which is not fixated (Group 2, n = 32). The patients were evaluated in respect of bone union and malalignment from direct radiographs. Union was evaluated according to the RUST criteria, and the threshold for malalignment was taken as 5˚ in the coronal and sagittal planes.

Results: The patients comprised 24 males and 20 females (M/F: 6/5) with a mean age of 42.7 years (range, 19-76 years). Non-union was observed in 3/12 patients (25%) in Group 1, and in 2/32 (6.3%) patients in Group 2 at 6 months. Malalignment was observed in 1/12 (8.3%) patients in Group 1 (procurvatum) and in 7/32 (21.8%) patients in Group 2, of which 3 (9.3%) were varus, and 4 (12.5%) were valgus. The rate of malalignment was significantly lower in Group 1 than in Group 2.

Conclusions: The results demonstrated that bone union of a tibial shaft fracture is slower in patients with an anatomic fibula compared to those with non-anatomic fibula. Although the anatomic fibula slows the rate of union, it prevents malalignment.

Keywords

References

  1. 1. Kojima K, Ferreira R. Tibial shaft fracture. Rev Bras Ortop 2011;46:130-5.
  2. 2. Court-Brown CM, McBirnie J. The epidemiology of tibial fractures.J Bone Joint Surg Br 1995;77:417-21.
  3. 3. Sarmiento A, Latta LL. 450 closed fractures of the distal third of the tibia treated with a functional brace. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004;428:261-71.
  4. 4. Guo JJ, Tang N, Yang HL, Tang TS. A prospective, randomised trial comparing closed intramedullary nailing with percutaneous plating in the treatment of distal metaphyseal fractures of the tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010;92:984-8.
  5. 5. Vallier HA, Cureton BA, Patterson BM. Randomized, prospective comparison of plate versus intramedullary nail fixation for distal tibia shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2011;25:736-41.
  6. 6. Court-Brown CM, Christie J, McQueen MM. Closed intramedullary tibial nailing. Its use in closed and type I open fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1990;72:605-11.
  7. 7. Zelle BA, Bhandari M, Espiritu M, Koval KJ, Zlowodzki M; Evidence-Based Orthopaedic Trauma Working Group. Treatment of distal tibia fractures without articular involvement: a systematic review of 1125 fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2006;20:76-9.
  8. 8. Teitz C, Carter Di Frankel V. Problems associated with tibial fractures with intact fibulae. J Bone Joint Surg 1980;62:770-6.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Orthopaedics

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

July 4, 2020

Submission Date

December 14, 2018

Acceptance Date

January 27, 2020

Published in Issue

Year 2020 Volume: 6 Number: 4

AMA
1.Evren AT, Yaradılmış YU, Okkaoğlu MC, Ateş A, Demirkale İ, Altay M. Effect of anatomic fibula on tibia union and alignment after intramedullary nailing of tibia shaft fractures. Eur Res J. 2020;6(4):337-342. doi:10.18621/eurj.497382

Cited By