Agricultural injuries encountered in Giresun, which is an agricultural city of Turkey
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to determine the demographic and clinical features of gardening injuries in an agricultural city and to provide some suggestions to reduce the incidence of agricultural injuries.
Methods: This study assessed 419 gardening injuries that were admitted to the emergency department of Giresun University Prof. Dr. Ilhan Özdemir Training and Research Hospital between June 30, 2015 and November 1, 2015. We retrospectively examined all the documents, x-rays, tomographies, and tomography reports related to the cases.
Results: Falls from a height (19.3%), falls (31.5%), foreign body crashes (FBCs) (14.8%), sharp-penetrating object injuries (SPOIs) (29.8%), and motorized/motorless device injuries (MMDIs) (4.5%) were the major categories of gardening injuries. Most of the falls from a height were from a tree (86%), primarily fig trees (54.3%). SPOIs primarily affected the hand-wrist area with 82 cases (65.6%); the most common sharp tools that caused injury were sickle-scythes (47.2%) and axes (35.2%). FBCs frequently affected the eyes (48.4%) and head region (17.7%), and tree branches were the most common foreign bodies causing such crashes (38.7%). MMDIs were caused primarily by haymaker harvester machines (42%). Three cases died (0.7%), and 305 cases (72.8%) were discharged after emergency treatment. Additionally, 115 cases (27.5%) were hospitalized, 11 cases underwent urgent surgery, and 63 cases underwent elective surgery. Using uncuttable gloves, socks, and knee-guards could prevent 88% of SPOIs. Furthermore, eyewear and head guards could prevent 60.1% of FBC injuries.The usage of fall arrest equipment particularly for only fig and pear tree types could prevent 68.6% of the falls from a tree.
Conclusions: Gardening injuries are significant traumas in agricultural regions. By implementing simple and cheap security measures, we can prevent destrucitive traumas.
Keywords
References
- 1. Missikpode C, Peek-Asa C, Young T, Swanton A, Leinenkugel K, Torner J. Trends in non-fatal agricultural injuries requiring trauma care. Inj Epidemiol 2015;2:30.
- 2. Das B. Agricultural work related injuries among the farmers of West Bengal, India. Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot 2014;21:205-15.
- 3. Allen DL, Kearney GD, Higgins S. A descriptive study of farm-related injuries presenting to emergency departments in North Carolina: 2008-2012. J Agromedicine 2015;20:398-408.
- 4. Pfortmueller CA, Kradolfer D, Kunz M, Lehmann B, Lindner G, Exadaktylos AK. Injuries in agriculture – injury severity and mortality. Swiss Med Wkly 2013;143:w13846.
- 5. Browning SR, Truszczynska H, Reed D, McKnight RH. Agricultural injuries among older Kentucky farmers: The Farm Family Health and Hazard Surveillance Study. Am J Ind Med 1998;33:341-53.
- 6. Zhou C, Roseman JM. Agricultural injuries among a population-based sample of farm operators in Alabama. Am J Ind Med 1994;25:385-402.
- 7. Tiwari PS, Gite LP, Dubey AK, Kot LS. Agricultural injuries in Central India: nature, magnitude, and economic impact. J Agric Saf Health 2002;8:95-111.
- 8. Patel T, Pranav PK, Biswas M. Nonfatal agricultural work-related injuries: a case study from Northeast India. Work 2018;59:367-74.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Surgery, Emergency Medicine
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Selim Turfan
*
0000-0003-3524-2512
Türkiye
Faruk Özşahin
This is me
0000-0002-8294-0885
Türkiye
Gökhan Uzun
This is me
0000-0001-9425-0446
Türkiye
Bora Arslan
This is me
0000-0002-2469-2334
Türkiye
Mustafa Tolga Gürgen
This is me
0000-0003-0190-0433
Türkiye
Tuğrul Kesicioğlu
0000-0002-9263-5032
Türkiye
Publication Date
July 4, 2020
Submission Date
December 20, 2018
Acceptance Date
August 17, 2019
Published in Issue
Year 2020 Volume: 6 Number: 4