Research Article

Safe use of vascular stapling devices during laparoscopic cholecystectomy in cases with enlarged cystic canal

Volume: 6 Number: 5 September 4, 2020
EN

Safe use of vascular stapling devices during laparoscopic cholecystectomy in cases with enlarged cystic canal

Abstract

Objectives: Bile duct injuries and fistulas due to bile leakage are observed at certain rates in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In complicated cases, in patients with cholelithiasis cystic duct edema, the cystic canal may be enlarged to the extent that it cannot be closed with a clip in a standard operation. In this study we evaluated the eficiency of stapler closure of cystic canal.

Methods: In this retrospective study the cases who had laparoscopic cholecystectomy and cystic canal was closed with stapler between August 2016 and December 2018 were reviewed. Patients' hospital stay and complications were noted.

Results: Thirty-three patients who were electively operated and cystic canal closure was performed with vascular staples because of a wide cystic canal during the operation were included in this study. Low bile drainage was observed in only one case and this patient had spontaneous regression with conservative follow-up. Mean duration of hospital stay was 3.7 days. Patients were followed up from 2 months to 28 months postoperatively.

Conclusions: Endo-vasculer stapler can be used safely during laparoscopic cholecystectomy with a history of stones in the main bile duct. In this group of patients, it is advisable to make preparations in this direction before the operation. 

Keywords

References

  1. 1. NIH Consensus Conference. Gallstones and laparoscopiccholecystectomy. JAMA 1993;269:1018-24.
  2. 2. Muroni M, Loi V, Lionnet F, Girot R, Houry S. Prophylactic laparoscopic cholecystectomy in adult sickle cell disease patients with cholelithiasis: a prospective cohort study. Int J Surg. 2015;22:62-6.
  3. 3. Portincasa P, Di Ciaula A, de Bari O, Garruti G, Palmieri VO, Wang DQ. Management of gallstones and its related complications. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016;10:93-112.
  4. 4. Chowbey PK, Sharma A, Khullar R, Mann V, Baijal M, Vashistha A. Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy: a reviewof 56 procedures. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2000;10:31-4.
  5. 5. Cushieri A, Dubois F, Mouiel J, Mouret P, Becker H, Buess G, et al. The European experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 1991;161:385-7.
  6. 6. Koo KP, Thirlby RC. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acutecholecystitis: what is the optimal time for operation? Arch Surg1996;131:540-5.
  7. 7. Rattner DW, Ferguson C, Warshaw AL. Factors associatedwith successful laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Ann Surg 1993;217:233-6.
  8. 8. Chandler CF, Lane JS, Ferguson P, Thompson JE, Ashley SW.Prospective evaluation of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for treatment of acute cholecystitis. Am Surg 2000;66:896-900.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Surgery

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

September 4, 2020

Submission Date

June 12, 2019

Acceptance Date

September 23, 2019

Published in Issue

Year 2020 Volume: 6 Number: 5

AMA
1.Fırat YD, Erol MF. Safe use of vascular stapling devices during laparoscopic cholecystectomy in cases with enlarged cystic canal. Eur Res J. 2020;6(5):479-484. doi:10.18621/eurj.576891

Cited By