Research Article

Relevant muscle selection for needle electromyography examination in polio survivors

Volume: 7 Number: 5 September 4, 2021
EN

Relevant muscle selection for needle electromyography examination in polio survivors

Abstract

Objectives: Needle electromyography (EMG) has an important role in the diagnosis of poliomyelitis. Since needle EMG is a painful and time consuming procedure, selecting the most effective muscles for needle EMG is important. We aimed to determine the clinically or subclinically affected regions in polio survivors by examining the minimum number of muscles with EMG.

Methods: Polio survivors with weakness in at least one limb were included in this retrospective cohort study. The extremities were divided into two groups: 1) Group 1: The extremities with Medical Research Council score of ≤ 1 in at least one muscle, 2) Group 2: Clinically unaffected or mildly to moderately affected extremities that do not meet the criteria of Group 1. The needle EMG findings of the muscles were analyzed.

Results: Twenty-nine polio survivors were included in the study. Needle EMG findings of 352 muscles were reviewed. Needle EMG findings in 57 lower extremities and thirty-two upper extremities were analyzed. There was no upper extremity meeting the criteria of Group 1. Thirty-eight lower extremities were included in Group 1. The amplitudes and durations of motor unit action potentials (MUAPs) were not different between the muscles of the Group 1 lower extremities (p > 0.05). Among the muscles of Group 2 upper and lower extremities, the amplitude and duration of MUAPs were higher in the deltoid and the vastus lateralis muscles compared to the other muscles, respectively (p = 0.002 and p = 0.003 for upper extremity muscles; p = 0.005 and p < 0.001 for lower extremity muscles).

Conclusions: Using the needle EMG findings, an algorithm was made to determine the affected regions. Thus, the affected regions can be identified by applying needle EMG to a minimum number of muscles.

Keywords

References

  1. 1. Agre JC, Rodriquez AA, Tafel JS. Late effects of polio: critical review of the literature on neuromuscular function. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1991;72:923-31.
  2. 2. Horstmann DM. Epidemiology of poliomyelitis and allied diseases – 1963. Yale J Biol Med 1963;36:5-26.
  3. 3. Bodian D. Histopathological basis of clinical findings in poliomyelitis. Am J Med 1949;6:563-78.
  4. 4. Kidd D, Williams AJ, Howard RS. Poliomyelitis. Postgrad Med J 1996;72:641-7.
  5. 5. Lo JK, Robinson LR. Postpolio syndrome and late effects of poliomyelitis. Part 1. Pathogenesis, biomechanical considerations, diagnosis, and investigations. Muscle Nerve 2018;58:751-9.
  6. 6. Jubelt B, Cashman NR. Neurological manifestations of the post-polio syndrome. Crit Rev Neurobiol 1987;3:199-200.
  7. 7. McComas AJ, Quartly C, Griggs RC. Early and late losses of motor units after poliomyelitis. Brain 1997;120:1415-21.
  8. 8. Stalberg E, Grimby G. Dynamic electromyography and muscle biopsy changes in a 4-year follow-up: study of patients with a history of polio. Muscle Nerve 1981;4:524-8.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Neurology and Neuromuscular Diseases

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

September 4, 2021

Submission Date

January 24, 2020

Acceptance Date

March 17, 2021

Published in Issue

Year 2021 Volume: 7 Number: 5

AMA
1.Fidancı H, Öztürk İ, Arlıer Z. Relevant muscle selection for needle electromyography examination in polio survivors. Eur Res J. 2021;7(5):440-446. doi:10.18621/eurj.679456