Comparison of the effect of ethanol and potassium iodide in antibacterial photodynamic therapy on gram negative pathogens
Abstract
Objectives: Antibiotics is the most common treatment for bacterial infections. However, bacteria can change their genetic material, develop antibiotic resistance and cannot be treated. This brings the need for new treatment methods. Antibacterial Photodynamic Therapy is becoming a promising approach to treat bacterial infections. It is based on the use of photosensitizer to be activated by light with an appropriate wavelength and it will result in reactive oxygen species which are responsible for the destruction of pathogens. In this study, Antibacterial Photodynamic Therapy was examined for the treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa with the help of ethanol and potassium iodide.
Methods: The effect of Chlorin e6-based photoinactivation was studied on Multidrug resistant P. aeruginosa upon irradiation with 655-nm diode laser. Then ethanol and potassium iodide was added to the mechanism separately to increase the efficacy of photoinactivation. After each application, serial dilution method was used for the determination of viable cells.
Results: Outcomes showed that only Antibacterial Photodynamic Therapy causes a mortality rate of 75%. Addition of ethanol causes a mortality rate of 93% and addition of potassium iodide causes a mortality rate of 99.9% with less amount of Chlorin e6 and light dose.
Conclusions: Chlorin-e6 based photoinactivation did not provide high mortality rate on P. aeruginosa. The use of ethanol and potassium iodide increased the effect of photoinactivation. The highest mortality rate was obtained with potassium iodide. It was understood that potassium iodide was a better concomitant agent to increase the bactericidal effect of Antibacterial Photodynamic Therapy on P. aeruginosa.
Keywords
Supporting Institution
Project Number
Thanks
References
- 1. Dhar AD. Overview of Bacterial Skin Infections. Merck Manual available at: www.merckmanuals.com/home/skin-disorders/bacterial-skin-infections/overview-of-bacterial-skin-infections. Accessed July 20, 2018.
- 2. Blair JM, Webber MA, Baylay AJ, Ogbolu DO, Piddock LJ. Molecular mechanisms of antibiotic resistance. Nat Rev Microbiol 2015;13:42-51.
- 3. Park JH, Moon YH, Bang IS, Kim YC, Kim SA, Ahn SG, et al. Antimicrobial effect of photodynamic therapy using a highly pure chlorin e6. Lasers Med Sci 2010;25:705-10.
- 4. Liu Y, Qin R, Zaat SA, Breukink E, Heger M. Antibacterial photodynamic therapy: overview of a promising approach to fight antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections. J Clin Transl Sci 2015;1:140.
- 5. Nagata JY, Hioka N, Kimura E, Batistela VR, Terada RSS, Graciano AX, et al. Antibacterial photodynamic therapy for dental caries: evaluation of the photosensitizers used and light source properties. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther 2012;9:122-31.
- 6. Sies H. Oxidative stress: a concept in redox biology and medicine. Redox Biol 2015;4:180-3.
- 7. Repetto M, Boveris A, Semprine J. Lipid peroxidation: chemical mechanism, biological implications and analytical determination. In: Lipid Peroxidation, Catala A, ed. IntechOpen 2012;1:3-30.
- 8. Kostenich GA, Zhuravkin IN, Zhavrid EA. Experimental grounds for using chlorin ρ6 in the photodynamic therapy of malignant tumors. J Photochem Photobiol B 1994;22:211-7.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Infectious Diseases , Medical Microbiology
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Melike Çağan
0000-0002-0616-6488
Türkiye
Emel Bakay
This is me
0000-0002-3042-810X
Türkiye
Aziz Kolkıran
0000-0002-7440-5428
Türkiye
Publication Date
July 4, 2021
Submission Date
May 15, 2020
Acceptance Date
March 24, 2021
Published in Issue
Year 1970 Volume: 7 Number: 4