Research Article

Complications of labial minor salivary gland biopsy and comparison of complications in patients with and without primary Sjögren's syndrome

Volume: 6 Number: 5 September 4, 2020
EN

Complications of labial minor salivary gland biopsy and comparison of complications in patients with and without primary Sjögren's syndrome

Abstract

Objectives: Labial minor salivary gland biopsy (MSGB) is a procedure in which complications such as bleeding, hematoma, numbness, wetness can be seen after the procedure. It is not known whether these complications have changed in patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome (PSS). The aim of this study is to investigate the frequency of complications after the labial MSGB and to investigate whether these complications has changed in PSS.

Methods: Participants with a preliminary diagnosis of PSS who underwent a labial MSGB without any suture were included in the study. One month after the procedure, the complication screening questionnaire was administered face-to-face interview or by telephone. All complications were compared between PSS and non-PPS groups.

Results: Complications screening questionnaire was applied to 99 participants (face to face with 79 participants and by telephone with 20 participants). After the procedure, 17.2% of the participants had uncomfortable bleeding, 2.0% had persistent numbness which continues more than 1 week and 1.0% had wetness and hematoma. Bleeding duration was more than 1 hour in 11.1% of the participants. Complications were not different between PSS and non-PSS groups (p > 0.05).

Conclusions: After the labial MSGB procedure without suturing, uncomfortable bleeding is frequent and the duration of bleeding is long, but complications other than bleeding are rare. The incidence of complications after labial MSGB procedure was not different in participants with PSS than in those without PSS.

Keywords

References

  1. 1. Alhajj M, Babos M. Physiology, Salivation. StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL), 2019.
  2. 2. Carr AJ, Ng WF, Figueiredo F, Macleod RI, Greenwood M, Staines K. Sjögren's syndrome – an update for dental practitioners. Br Dent J 2012;213:353-7.
  3. 3. Thoppay JR, De Rossi SS, Ciarrocca KN. Burning mouth syndrome. Dent Clin North Am 2013;57:497-512.
  4. 4. Hay CR. Acquired haemophilia. Baillieres Clin Haematol 1998;11:287-303.
  5. 5. Zhang W, Wang F, Wang H, Hua B, Feng X, Sun L. Severe thrombocytopenia in connective tissue diseases: a single-center review of 131 cases. Clin Rheumatol 2018;37:3337-44.
  6. 6. Chisholm DM, Mason DK. Labial salivary gland biopsy in Sjogren's disease. J Clin Pathol. 1968;21:656-60.
  7. 7. Berquin K, Mahy P, Weynand B, Reychler H. Accessory or sublingual salivary gland biopsy to assess systemic disease: a comparative retrospective study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2006;263:233-6.
  8. 8. Friedman JA, Miller EB, Huszar M. A simple technique for minor salivary gland biopsy appropriate for use by rheumatologists in an outpatient setting. Clin Rheumatol 2002;21:349-50.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Rheumatology and Arthritis

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

September 4, 2020

Submission Date

May 28, 2020

Acceptance Date

June 10, 2020

Published in Issue

Year 1970 Volume: 6 Number: 5

AMA
1.Ayar K, Doğan A, Küçük A, Tunç R. Complications of labial minor salivary gland biopsy and comparison of complications in patients with and without primary Sjögren’s syndrome. Eur Res J. 2020;6(5):508-516. doi:10.18621/eurj.743915

Cited By