The effect of additional staple in the tibial fixation of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a biomechanical study in sheep tibia
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the necessity of staple use and the importance of screw diameter in the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.
Methods: Twenty-eight sheep hind legs were divided into four groups in terms of tibial side fixation type as 7 mm bioabsorbable screw (Group 1), 7 mm bioabsorbable screw and staple (Group 2), 8 mm screw (Group 3), and 8 mm screw and staple (Group 4). The maximum force causing insufficiency in the graft, and the fixation strength between the groups were recorded. The results were compared among the groups.
Results: As a result of the statistical analysis regarding the necessity of using staple, group 2, with 7 mm screws and staple, was found to be significantly more resistant than group 1 (p = 0.018). In consequence of the biostatistics study, staple use was found not to create a statistically significant difference between group 3 in which an 8 mm bioabsorbable screw was used and group 4 (p = 0.805). In the statistical study to understand the significance of screw diameter, the samples of group 1 and group 3, in which no staple was used, were compared. It was found that group 3 samples with 8 mm screws had higher strength than those with 7 mm screws (p = 0.011). Between group 2 and group 4 in which a staple was used, despite the increase in screw diameter, the value of maximum strength had no remarkable difference statistically (p = 1.00).
Conclusions: Fixation strength is higher when fixation was done with a screw 1 mm larger than tibial tunnel diameter. However, using either a screw with 1 mm wider than tibial tunnel diameter and the screw in the same diameter with the tibial tunnel and additional staple have similar fixation strength on the tibial side. Therefore, we conclude that screw width is more important in maintaining stability of the graft fixation.
Keywords
References
- 1. Fabbriciani C, Mulas PD, Ziranu F, Deriu L, Zarelli D, Millano G. Mechanical analysis of fixation methods for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a hamstring tendon graft. An experimental study in sheep knees. Knee 2005;12:135-8.
- 2. Lee JJ, Otarodifard K, Jun BJ, McGarry MH, Hatch GF, Lee TQ. Is supplementary fixation necessary in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions? Am J Sports Med 2011;39:360-5.
- 3. Patkowski M, Królikowska A, Reichert P. Comparison of bioabsorbable interference screws composed of poly-l-lactic acid and hydroxyapatite (PLLA-HA) to WasherLoc tibial fixation in patients after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction of the knee joint. Polim Med 2016;46:53-8.
- 4. Sun T, Zhang H. Biomechanical comparison of a novel tibial fixation technique versus interference screw fixation for ACL reconstruction using soft tissue grafts. Orthop J Sports Med 2021;9:23259671211028559.
- 5. Brand J Jr, Weiler A, Caborn DN. Graft Fixation in cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2000;28:761-74.
- 6. Micucci CJ, Frank DA, Kompel J, Muffly M, Demeo PJ, Altman GT. The effect of interference screw diameter on fixation of soft-tissue grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2010;26:1105-10.
- 7. Siebold R, Dejour D, Zaffagnini S. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. A Practical Surgical Guide. Heidelberg: Springer, 2014.
- 8. Herrera A, Martinez F, Iglesias D, Cegonino J, Ibarz E, Gracia L. Fixation strength of biocomposite wedge interference screw in ACL reconstruction: effect of screw length and tunnel/ screw ratio. A controlled laboratory study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2010; 11:139.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Orthopaedics
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Onur Oto
*
0000-0002-8169-0570
Türkiye
Hasan Bombacı
0000-0002-8181-9805
Türkiye
Ergun Bozdağ
This is me
0000-0001-7412-1129
Türkiye
Sema Ertan Birsel
This is me
0000-0003-1089-1540
Türkiye
Dilara Bayır
This is me
0000-0002-2427-7077
Türkiye
Rıdvan Mete Oral
This is me
0000-0002-6008-9372
Türkiye
Publication Date
May 4, 2022
Submission Date
March 28, 2021
Acceptance Date
December 21, 2021
Published in Issue
Year 2022 Volume: 8 Number: 3