A rare missense Duchenne muscular dystrophy gene variant in a family with muscular dystrophy from Turkey
Abstract
Objectives: Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophies (DMD/BMD) are muscle diseases that show X-linked recessive inheritance. The disease occurs depending on large mutations, deletions/duplications, small mutations, point mutations and mid-intronic mutations of the gene encoding the protein called dystrophin. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to investigate the pathogenic variants of DMD in the affected family.
Methods: A 23-year-old male who had weakness in the muscles, difficulty climbing the stairs, frequent falls at the age of seven was referred to the Medical Genetics department for an initial diagnosis of DMD/BMD. His siblings also suffered from similar symptoms. Therefore, eight individuals from the same family were included in the study. MLPA analysis was performed to evaluate deletion/duplication and variants of the DMD gene were evaluated by targeted NGS. Sophia DDM algorithms were used for the bioinformatics analysis of data, and the pathogenicity of the mutations was evaluated based on in silico prediction tools.
Results: Allelic variants were identified in 8 individuals of the family including two suspected patients and six suspected obligatory carriers. NGS analysis revealed that proband and his nephew were hemizygous for pathogenic c.10018T> C (p.Cys3340Arg, C3340R) mutation and mother, two sisters and niece were carriers.
Conclusions: C3340R mutation was first reported in a Taiwanese BMD patient among the 23 different pathologic changes. This variant identified as pathogenic because of being highly conserved cysteine substitution in the dystroglycan-binding domain of dystrophin. This study has the importance of reporting an infrequent pathogenic mutation, C3340R, in two patients and four suspected obligatory carriers of a Turkish family.
Keywords
References
- 1. Monaco AP, Bertelson CJ, Liechti-Gallati S, Moser H, Kunkel LM. An explanation for the phenotypic differences between patients bearing partial deletions of the DMD locus. Genomics 1988;2:90-5.
- 2. Darras BT, Urion DK, Ghosh PS. In: Adam MP, Ardinger HH, Pagon RA, Wallace SE, Bean LJH, Stephens K, Amemiya A, eds. Dystrophinopathies.GeneReviews®. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle;2000: pp.1993-2018.
- 3. Leiden Muscular Dystrophy pages. http://www.dmd.nl/. Accessed May 21, 2021.
- 4. Monaco AP, Neve RL, Colletti-Feener C, Bertelson CJ, Kurnit DM, Kunkel LM. Isolation of candidate cDNAs for portions of the Duchenne muscular dystrophy gene. Nature 1986;323:646-50.
- 5. Monaco AP, Bertelson CJ, Liechti-Gallati S, Moser H, Kunkel LM. An explanation for the phenotypic differences between patients bearing partial deletions of the DMD locus. Genomics 1988;2:90-5.
- 6. Flanigan KM, Dunn DM, von Niederhausern A, Soltanzadeh P, Gappmaier E, Howard MT, et al. Mutational spectrum of DMD mutations in dystrophinopathy patients: application of modern diagnostic techniques to a large cohort. Hum Mutat 2009;30:1657-66.
- 7. Gao QQ, McNally EM. The dystrophin complex: structure, function, and implications for therapy. Compr Physiol 2015;5:1223-39.
- 8. Aartsma-Rus A, Van Deutekom JC, Fokkema IF, Van Ommen GJ, Den Dunnen JT. Entries in the Leiden Duchenne muscular dystrophy mutation database: an overview of mutation types and paradoxical cases that confirm the reading-frame rule. Muscle Nerve 2006;34:135-44.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Internal Diseases
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Onur Tokgün
*
0000-0003-0537-9032
Türkiye
Burcu Albuz
0000-0002-9874-0781
Türkiye
Nedim Karagenç
0000-0002-8255-6621
Türkiye
Çağdaş Erdoğan
0000-0002-6231-7834
Türkiye
Aydın Demiray
0000-0002-3343-0184
Türkiye
Hakan Akça
0000-0002-9477-8571
Türkiye
Publication Date
March 4, 2022
Submission Date
May 31, 2021
Acceptance Date
December 6, 2021
Published in Issue
Year 2022 Volume: 8 Number: 2