Dental students’ perceptions on preclinical restorative dentistry course: Biruni University case

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 3, 199 - 204, 04.07.2018

Muhammet Kerim Ayar

https://doi.org/10.18621/eurj.353551

Cited By: 3

Öz

Objectives. The student’s perspectives of their
restorative dentistry education would be an important source of information for
evaluation of preclinical curriculum. Thus, the aim of the present research was
to obtain information from second-year students at Biruni University dental
school about their preclinical restorative dentistry program perceptions,
levels of stress during preclinical courses and preparedness for upcoming
restorative dentistry courses in clinics. Methods. The present survey was
carried out on the second year students in dental school in Istanbul. The
survey composed of items regarding students’ perspectives regarding to the
levels of their stress in preclinical restorative dentistry courses as well as
preparedness for future restorative dentistry courses in clinic. Student’s
t-test was applied to the data. Results. Students found posterior
composite restorations lessons more stress-full than amalgam restoration
lessons. They expressed that knowledge they obtained from the lectures is
adequate for preclinical courses and they felt themselves prepared for the
restoration of posterior teeth in clinic. Conclusions. Second-year student’s
perceptions of preclinical restorative dentistry curriculum in Biruni
University were highly positive. The student’s perspectives of their
restorative dentistry curriculum would be an important source of information
for dental faculty staff in order to establish an adequate preclinical
curriculum for the students who start delivering public patient care in the
future. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Restorative dentistry, preclinical course, student perception

Kaynakça

• [1] Henzi D, Davis E, Jasinevicius R, Hendricson W, Cintron L, Isaacs M. Appraisal of the dental school learning environment: the students’ view. J Dent Res 2005;69:1137-47.
• [2] Lynch CD, Frazier KB, McConnell RJ, Blum IR, Wilson NH. Minimally invasive management of dental caries: contemporary teaching of posterior resin-based composite placement in US and Canadian dental schools. J Am Dent Assoc 2011;142:612-20.
• [3] Rafeek RN, Marchan SM, Naidu RS, Carrotte PV. Perceived competency at graduation among dental alumni of the University of the West Indies. J Dent Educ 2004;68:81-88.
• [4] Bertolami CN. Rationalizing the dental curriculum in light of current disease prevalence and patient demand for treatment: form vs. content. J Dent Educ 2001;65:725-35.
• [5] Dikbaş İ, Özkurt-Kayahan Z, Ünalan F. Evaluation of second year dental students’ perceptions on preclinical prosthodontic program. 7tepeklinik 2016;1:5-12.
• [6] Suksudaj N, Townsend GC, Kaidonis J, Lekkas D, Winning TA. Acquiring psychomotor skills in operative dentistry: do innate ability and motivation matter? Eur J Dent Educ 2012;16:e187-94.
• [7] Koo S, Kim A, Donoff RB, Karimbux NY. An initial assessment of haptics in preclinical operative dentistry training. J Investig Clin Dent 2015;6:69-76.
• [8] Heintze U, Radeborg K, Bengtsson H, Stenlaas A. Assessment and evaluation of individual prerequisites for dental education. Eur J Dent Educ 2004;8:152-60.
• [9] Yeo GB, Neal A. A multilevel analysis of effort, practice, and performance: effects; of ability, conscientiousness, and goal orientation. J Appl Psychol 2004;89:231-47.