Relationship between Cyberbullying, Victimization and Depression among High School Students in Turkiye

Year 2025, Volume: 15 Issue: 2, 144 - 152, 29.08.2025

Cem Uysal , Tuğba Çobanoğlu , Neslim Güvendeğer Doksat , Zeliha Yıldırım , Hümeyra Aslan , Mahi Aslan , Feyza İnceoğlu , Mehmet Oğuz Polat

https://doi.org/10.26650/experimed.1706159

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between depression, cyberbullying, and cybervictimization among high school students in the Diyarbakir region during the post-pandemic period of COVID-19.

Materials and Methods: A total of 1,985 high school students (1,057 females and 928 males), aged 13 to 18, from the Diyarbakir province participated in this cross-sectional survey. Participants completed the Bullying and Cyberbullying Scale for Adolescents (BCS-A) and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). Sociodemographic characteristics and computer and internet usage behaviours were evaluated as factors influencing the scale scores.

Results: Cyberbullying was found to be more prevalent among male students with higher access to digital devices (computers, phones, tablets) and longer internet use, particularly those whose mothers had higher education levels. Conversely, elevated BDI scores were observed among female students in the tenth grade who attended public schools, had more than four siblings, and had limited access to technological resources. Statistically significant positive correlations were identified between the BDI scores and both the bullying perpetration and victimization scores.

Conclusion: This study highlights the growing impact of digital aggression on adolescent mental health in Turkiye and underscores the importance of targeted forensic-psychiatric screening and early preventive strategies in high school populations.

Keywords

Cyberbullying , Cybervictimization , Adolescent Mental Health , Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) , Internet Use , COVID-19 Pandemic

Ethical Statement

The study was approved by the Non-Interventional Research Ethics Committee of Dicle University, Faculty of Medicine (Decision number: 494, Date: 15.12.2021). All participants gave written informed consent, and the study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Supporting Institution

This study was not supported by any specific grant or funding institution.

Project Number

None

Thanks

The authors would like to thank the school administrations and students who voluntarily participated in this study.

References

• 1. Olweus D. Bullying at school: what we know and what we can do. Oxford, UK Blackwell; 1993. google scholar
• 2. Kowalski RM, Giumetti GW, Schroeder AN, Lattanner MR. Bullying in the digital age: a critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychol Bull 2014; 140(4): 1073-137. google scholar
• 3. Wang J, Iannotti RJ, Nansel TR. School bullying among adolescents in the United States: physical, verbal, relational, and cyber. J Adolesc Health 2009; 45(4): 368-75. google scholar
• 4. Yang X, Huang Y, Li B. Attachment anxiety and cyberbullying victimization in college students: the mediating role of social media self-disclosure and the moderating role of gender. Front Psychol 2023; 14: 1274517. google scholar
• 5. Orben A, Przybylski AK. The association between adolescent well-being and digital technology use. Nat Hum Behav 2019; 3(2): 173-82. google scholar
• 6. Shao IY, Al-Shoaibi AAA, Testa A, Ganson KT, Baker FC, Nagata JM. The Association between family environment and subsequent risk of cyberbullying victimization in adolescents. Acad Pediatr 2024; 24(6): 957-62. google scholar
• 7. Cassidy W, Faucher C, Jackson M. Cyberbullying among youth: A comprehensive review of current international research and its implications and application to policy and practice. School Psychol Int 2013; 34(6): 575-612. google scholar
• 8. Slonje R, Smith PK. Cyberbullying: another main type of bullying? Scand J Psychol 2008; 49(2): 147-54. google scholar
• 9. Vandebosch H, Van Cleemput K. Defining cyberbullying: a qualitative research into the perceptions of youngsters. Cyberpsychol Behav 2008; 11(4): 499-503. google scholar
• 10. John A, Glendenning AC, Marchant A, Montgomery P, Stewart A, Wood S, et al. Self-harm, suicidal behaviours, and cyberbullying in children and young people: systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2018; 20(4): e129. google scholar
• 11. Hinduja S, Patchin JW. Bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide. Arch Suicide Res 2010; 14(3): 206-21. google scholar
• 12. Thomas HJ, Scott JG, Coates JM, Connor JP. Development and validation of the bullying and cyberbullying scale for adolescents: A multi-dimensional measurement model. Br J Educ Psychol 2019; 89(1): 75-94. google scholar
• 13. Ozbey H, Basdas O. Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Bullying and Cyber Bullying Scale for Adolescents (BCS-A). Psychiatry Res 2020; 289: 112994. google scholar
• 14. Hisli N. A study on the validity of Beck Depression Inventory (Beck Depresyon Envanterinin geçerliliği üzerine bir çalışma.). Psikoloji Dergisi 1988; 6: 118-22. google scholar
• 15. Onalan G, Onalan R, Selam B, Akar M, Gunenc Z, Topcuoglu A. Mood scores in relation to hormone replacement therapies during menopause: a prospective randomized trial. Tohoku J Exp Med 2005; 207(3): 223-31. google scholar
• 16. Chou WJ, Wang PW, Hsiao RC, Hu HF, Yen CF. Role of school bullying involvement in depression, anxiety, suicidality, and low self-esteem among adolescents with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder. Front Psychiatry 2020; 11: 9. google scholar
• 17. Gobina I, Zaborskis A, Pudule I, Kalnins I, Villerusa A. Bullying and subjective health among adolescents at schools in Latvia and Lithuania. Int J Public Health 2008; 53(5): 272-6. google scholar
• 18. Naveed S, Waqas A, Aedma KK, Afzaal T, Majeed MH. Association of bullying experiences with depressive symptoms and psychosocial functioning among school going children and adolescents. BMC Res Notes 2019; 12(1): 198. google scholar
• 19. Durbeej N, Ssegonja R, Salari R, Dahlberg A, Fabian H, Sarkadi A. Preschoollevel socio-economic deprivation in relation to emotional and behavioural problems among preschool children in Sweden. Scand J Public Health 2024; 52(8): 978-87. google scholar
• 20. Gustafsson BM, Proczkowska-Bjorklund M, Gustafsson PA. Emotional and behavioural problems in Swedish preschool children rated by preschool teachers with the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). BMC Pediatr 2017; 17(1): 110. google scholar
• 21. Haltigan JD, Vaillancourt T. Joint trajectories of bullying and peer victimization across elementary and middle school and associations with symptoms of psychopathology. Dev Psychol 2014; 50(11): 2426-36. google scholar
• 22. Fekkes M, Pijpers FI, Verloove-Vanhorick SP. Bullying behavior and associations with psychosomatic complaints and depression in victims. J Pediatr 2004; 144(1): 17-22. google scholar
• 23. Craig W, Boniel-Nissim M, King N, Walsh SD, Boer M, Donnelly PD, et al. Social media use and cyber-bullying: a cross-national analysis of young people in 42 countries. J Adolesc Health 2020; 66(6S): S100-S8. google scholar
• 24. Yin H, Han Z, Li Y. Traditional bullying, cyberbullying, and quality of life among adolescents in 35 countries: Do cultural values matter? Soc Sci Med 2024; 340: 116499. google scholar
• 25. Aksaray S. Cyberbullying. J Cukurova Univ Inst Social Sci 2011; 20(2): 405-32. google scholar
• 26. Martinez-Monteagudo MC, Delgado B, Garcia-Fernandez JM, Ruiz-Esteban C. Cyberbullying in the university setting. Relationship with emotional problems and adaptation to the university. Front Psychol 2019; 10: 3074. google scholar
• 27. Zhu C, Huang S, Evans R, Zhang W. Cyberbullying among adolescents and children: a comprehensive review of the global situation, risk factors, and preventive measures. Front Public Health 2021; 9: 634909. google scholar
• 28. Cook EE, Nickerson AB, Werth JM, Allen KP. Service providers' perceptions of and responses to bullying of individuals with disabilities. J Intellect Disabil 2017; 21(4): 277-96. google scholar
• 29. Guo S. A Meta-analysis of the predictors of cyberbullying perpetration and victimization. Psychol Schools 2016; 53(4): 432-53. google scholar
• 30. Ünver H, Koç Z. An investigation of the relationship between cyberbullying, problematic internet use, and risky online behaviors. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi 2017; 15(2): 117-40. google scholar
• 31. Yiğit MF, Keskin S, Yurdugül H. Investigating the relationship between cyberbullying and perceived family support in middle-school students in relation to gender, frequency of internet use, and grade. Addicta: Turkish J Addictions 2018; 5(2): 249-84. google scholar
• 32. Juvonen J, Gross EF. Extending the school grounds?–Bullying experiences in cyberspace. J Sch Health 2008; 78(9): 496-505. google scholar
• 33. Wolak J, Mitchell KJ, Finkelhor D. Does online harassment constitute bullying? An exploration of online harassment by known peers and online-only contacts. J Adolesc Health 2007; 41(6 Suppl 1): S51-8. google scholar
• 34. Chen Q, Lo CKM, Zhu Y, Cheung A, Chan KL, Ip P. Family poly-victimization and cyberbullying among adolescents in a Chinese school sample. Child Abuse Negl 2018; 77: 180-7. google scholar
• 35. Cagirkan B, Bilek G. Cyberbullying among Turkish high school students. Scand J Psychol 2021; 62(4): 608-16. google scholar
• 36. Ybarra ML, Diener-West M, Leaf PJ. Examining the overlap in internet harassment and school bullying: implications for school intervention. J Adolesc Health 2007; 41(6 Suppl 1): S42-50. google scholar
• 37. Nixon CL. Current perspectives: the impact of cyberbullying on adolescent health. Adolesc Health Med Ther 2014; 5: 143-58. google scholar
• 38. Korkmaz A. Cyberbullying: new violence from physical to virtual. Fiction 2016; 24(2): 74-85. google scholar
• 39. Dehue F, Bolman C, Vollink T. Cyberbullying: youngsters' experiences and parental perception. Cyberpsychol Behav 2008; 11(2): 217-23. google scholar