fbu-johs

Fenerbahçe University Journal of Health Sciences

2757-9905

Fenerbahçe Üniversitesi

10.56061/fbujohs.1211544

Health Care Administration

Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi

Do the Birth Stories That Midwifery Students Hear in Their Families Affect Their Profession Choices and Profession Belonging? A Cross-Sectional Study

Ebelik Öğrencilerinin Ailelerinde Duydukları Doğum Öyküleri Meslek Seçimlerini ve Mesleki Aidiyetlerini Etkiler Mi? Kesitsel Bir Çalışma

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1134-9016

Yıldız Karaahmet

Aysu

HALIC UNIVERSITY

08 23 2023

3 2 149 160 11 29 2022 01 20 2023

2021

Fenerbahçe Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi

This research was planned to evaluate the feelings of the students studying in the midwifery department about the profession, their perspectives on birth and the interest of their families with birth stories in their choice of profession. The research was conducted with a total of 129 students in the 2nd grade of 1.ve enrolled in the Midwifery B death of a foundation university in Istanbul in the 2021-2022 academic year. A quantitative design using an online survey was used to collect the data. This online questionnaire consists of two parts: "Questionnaire Form" and "Midwifery Belonging Scale". It was stated that 59.7% of the students were influenced by their families in their career choices, 82.2% chose the profession willingly, and 44.18% chose it because of their interest in the profession. 27.9% of the students reported that their mother was exposed to difficult birth, 32.5% had a history of difficult birth in their family, and 43.41% were upset when they heard a difficult birth story. When the students who answered "yes" and "no" to the questions about "choosing the profession willingly" and "the mother's exposure to difficult birth" were compared in terms of midwifery belonging level, a statistically significant difference was found in favor of those who said yes (p=0.003; p=0.002, respectively). According to the results of the regression analysis, it is seen that choosing the midwifery profession voluntarily (t=1.950 p

Bu araştırma, ebelik bölümünde okuyan öğrencilerin meslek seçiminde meslek hakkındaki duyguları, doğuma bakış açıları ve ailelerinin doğum hikayeleri ile olan ilgisini değerlendirmek amacıyla planlanmıştır. Araştırma, 2021-2022 eğitim öğretim yılında İstanbul’da bir vakıf üniversitesinin Ebelik bölümüne kayıtlı olan 1.ve 2. sınıf toplam 129 öğrenci ile yapıldı. Verilerin toplanmasında çevrimiçi anket uygulanan nicel bir tasarım kullanılmıştır. Bu çevrimiçi anket “Anket Formu” ve “Ebelik Aidiyet Ölçeği” olmak üzere iki kısımdan oluşmuştur. Öğrencileri %59,7’sini meslek seçimlerinde ailesinin etkili olduğu, %82,2’sinin mesleği isteyerek seçtiği, %44,18’nin mesleğe olan ilgi sebebiyle seçtiğini ifade etmiştir. Öğrencilerin %27,9’unun annesinin zor doğuma maruz kaldığı, %32,5’nun ise ailesinde zor doğum hikayesi yaşadığı, %43,41’nin zor doğum hikayesi duyduğunda üzüldüğünü bildirmiştir. Öğrencilere “mesleği isteyerek seçme”, “annenin zor doğuma maruz kalma” durumlarına ilişkin yöneltilen sorulara “evet” ve “hayır” yanıtını verenler Ebelik aidiyet düzeyi açısından karşılaştırıldığında evet diyenler lehine istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılık bulunmuştur (sırasıyla p=0.003; p=0.002). Yapılan regresyon analiz sonucuna göre, Ebelik mesleğini isteyerek seçme (t=1.950 p

Belonging Midwifery profession student dystocia

aidiyet distosi ebelik meslek öğrenci

Yok

Baskaya, Y., Sayıner, F. D., & Filiz, Z. (2020). How much do I belong to my profession? A scale development study: Midwifery Belonging Scale. Health care for women international, 41(8), 883–898.

Bass, J., Sidebotham, M., Gamble, J., & Fenwick, J. (2015). Commencing student midwife beliefs about birth and the role of the midwife. International Journal Birth, 5(2), 83–90.

Bilgiç, F. Ş. (2022). Ebelerin mesleki aidiyetlerinin incelenmesi: Kesitsel bir çalışma. İzmir Katip Çelebi Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 7 (1), 69-75.

Carolan, M. (2013). ‘A good midwife stands out’: 3rd year midwifery students’ views. Midwifery, 29(2),115–21.

Carolan, M., & Kruger, G. (2011). Undertaking midwifery studies: commencing students’ views. Midwifery, 27(5),642–7. Carolan, M., Kruger, G., & Brown, V. (2007). Out of the ashes: the new bachelor of midwifery curriculum at Victoria University. Women Birth, 20(3),127–30.

Cummins, A., Catling, C., Hogan, R., & Homer, C. (2014). Addressing culture shock in first year midwifery students: maximising the initial clinical experience. Women Birth, 27(4),271–5.

DeJoy, S. B. (2010). ‘‘Midwives are nice, but . . .’’: perceptions of midwifery and birth in an undergraduate class. Journal Midwifery Women’s Health, 55(2),117–23.

Doğan, Y.Ö., Orhan, İ., Yıldız, H. E., & Yılmaz, A., N. (2020). Determination of Compassion Levels of Students of the Department of Midwifery. Journal of İnönü University Vocational School of Health Services, 8(3), 566-577. Fraser, D. M., & Hughes, A. J. (2009). Perceptions of motherhood: the effect of experience and knowledge on midwifery students. Midwifery, 25(3), 307–16.

Green, S., & Baird, K. (2009). An exploratory, comparative study investigating attrition and retention of student midwives. Midwifery, 25(1), 79–87.

Hughes, A. J., & Fraser, D. M. (2011). ‘‘There are guiding hands and there are controlling hands’’: student midwives experience of mentorship in the UK. Midwifery, 27(4), 477–83.

Lothian, J. A., & Grauer, A. (2012). Giving birth: ‘‘we just don’t talk about it’’. Journal Perinatalogy Education, 21(2), 123–6.

McCall, L., Wray, N., & McKenna, L. (2009). Influence of clinical placement on undergraduate midwifery students’ career intentions. Midwifery, 25(4), 403–10.

McIntosh, A. E., Gidman, J., & McLaughlin, A. (2013). Students’ and lecturers’ perceptions of support in a UK pre-registration midwifery program. Nurse Education Practice, 13(6),578–83.

Minichiello, V., Aroni, R., Hays, T. (2008). Depth interviewing: principles, techniques, analysis (3rd ed.). Frenchs Forest: Pearson Education Australia.

Neergaard, M. A., Olesen, F., Andersen, R.S., & Sondergaard, J. (2009). Qualitative description the poor cousin of health research? BMC Med Res Methodol, 9(1), 52.

Newick, L., Vares, T., Dixon, L., Johnston, J., & Guilliland, K. A. (2013). Midwife who knows me:women tertiary students’ perceptions of midwifery. NZCOM J, 47,5–9.

Ocak, A. S., Kızılkaya, T., Çelik, M. & Yılmaz, T. (2021). Ebelik bölümü son sınıf öğrencilerinin mesleki aidiyet düzeyleri ve etkileyen faktörler: Kesitsel bir çalışma. Ebelik ve Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 4 (1), 23-33.

Sandall, J. (2012). Every woman needs a midwife, and some women need a doctor too. Birth-Issues Perinat Care, 39(4), 323–6.

Sandall, J., Soltani, H., Gates, S., Shennan, A. & Devane, D. (2013). Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 8. Art. No.: CD004667.

Sidebotham, M., & Ahern, K. (2011). Finding a way: the experiences of UK educated midwives finding their place in the midwifery workforce in Australia. Midwifery, 27(3), 316–23.

Sidebotham, M., Fenwick, J., Carter, A., & Gamble, A. (2015). Using the Five Senses Framework to understand the experiences of midwifery students enrolled in an undergraduate degree program. Midwifery, 31(1), 201–7.

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded Theory Methodology: An Overview. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (Charpter 17, pp. 273-285). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

Turan, İ., Unver H. (2021). The Effect of Professional Belonging on Compassion Fatigue and Quality of Life in Midwives. The Eurasia Proceedings of Health, Environment and Life Sciences, 3, 17-22

Whitehead, D. & Schneider, Z. (2013). Mixed-methods research. In Z. Schneider, D. Whitehead, G. LoBiondo-Wood & J. Haber (Eds.), Nursing & midwifery research: Methods and appraisal for evidence-based practice (4th ed., pp. 263-284). Elsevier - Mosby, Marrickville, Sydney.

Williams, J. (2006). Why women choose midwifery: a narrative analysis of motivations and understandings in a group of first year student midwives. Evid Based Midwifery, 4(2),46–52.