<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.4 20241031//EN"
        "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.4/JATS-journalpublishing1-4.dtd">
<article  article-type="research-article"        dtd-version="1.4">
            <front>

                <journal-meta>
                                                                <journal-id>fd</journal-id>
            <journal-title-group>
                                                                                    <journal-title>Felsefe Dünyası</journal-title>
            </journal-title-group>
                            <issn pub-type="ppub">1301-0875</issn>
                                        <issn pub-type="epub">2822-2970</issn>
                                                                                            <publisher>
                    <publisher-name>Türk Felsefe Derneği</publisher-name>
                </publisher>
                    </journal-meta>
                <article-meta>
                                        <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.58634/felsefedunyasi.1623102</article-id>
                                                                <article-categories>
                                            <subj-group  xml:lang="en">
                                                            <subject>Contemporary Philosophy </subject>
                                                    </subj-group>
                                            <subj-group  xml:lang="tr">
                                                            <subject>Çağdaş Felsefe</subject>
                                                    </subj-group>
                                    </article-categories>
                                                                                                                                                        <title-group>
                                                                                                                        <trans-title-group xml:lang="tr">
                                    <trans-title>Dijitalleşme ve İletişim Felsefesi: Spinozacı Bir Bakışla Dönüşen Öteki-Ben İlişkileri</trans-title>
                                </trans-title-group>
                                                                                                                                                                                                <article-title>Digitalization and Philosophy of Communication: Transforming Other-Self Relationships from a Spinozaist Perspective</article-title>
                                                                                                    </title-group>
            
                                                    <contrib-group content-type="authors">
                                                                        <contrib contrib-type="author">
                                                                    <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">
                                        https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3020-8550</contrib-id>
                                                                <name>
                                    <surname>Yılmaz</surname>
                                    <given-names>Özgür</given-names>
                                </name>
                                                                    <aff>IBN HALDUN UNIVERSITY</aff>
                                                            </contrib>
                                                                                </contrib-group>
                        
                                        <pub-date pub-type="pub" iso-8601-date="20250715">
                    <day>07</day>
                    <month>15</month>
                    <year>2025</year>
                </pub-date>
                                                    <issue>81</issue>
                                        <fpage>228</fpage>
                                        <lpage>251</lpage>
                        
                        <history>
                                    <date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="20250119">
                        <day>01</day>
                        <month>19</month>
                        <year>2025</year>
                    </date>
                                                    <date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="20250312">
                        <day>03</day>
                        <month>12</month>
                        <year>2025</year>
                    </date>
                            </history>
                                        <permissions>
                    <copyright-statement>Copyright © 1990, Felsefe Dünyası</copyright-statement>
                    <copyright-year>1990</copyright-year>
                    <copyright-holder>Felsefe Dünyası</copyright-holder>
                </permissions>
            
                                                                                                <trans-abstract xml:lang="tr">
                            <p>Bu makale, dijitalleşmenin iletişim felsefesi üzerindeki etkisini, özellikle benlik-öteki ilişkileri, hakikat sonrası dinamikler ve demokratik istişare bağlamında incelemektedir. Dijital iletişimin, epistemik parçalanmayı, dijital kabileciliği ve ortak anlamın aşınmasını teşvik ederek diyalog koşullarını dönüştürdüğünü öne sürmektedir. Çalışma, Spinoza’nın felsefesinden yararlanarak, zihin ve beden, hakikat ve ikna, akıl ve duygu gibi ikili karşıtlıkları sorgulamakta ve bunun yerine ilişkisel bir iletişim yaklaşımı önermektedir. Ayrıca, dezenformasyon, algoritmik filtreleme ve kimlik odaklı söylemin hakim olduğu bir çağda, istişari demokrasinin ve karşılıklı yardımlaşmanın karşılaştığı zorluklara dikkat çekmektedir. Disiplinler arası bir literatür taraması yöntemi kullanılarak yapılan bu çalışmada, Spinoza’nın potentia (kapasite olarak güç) kavramının, dijital alanlarda öznellik, ilişkisel etkileşim ve iletişim etiği üzerine yeniden düşünmek için teorik bir temel sunduğu öne sürülmektedir. Bulgular, parçalanmanın üstesinden gelmek için eleştirel medya okuryazarlığının teşvik edilmesi, diyalojik katılımın artırılması ve iletişimin bedensel, etkileşimsel ve etik açıdan duyarlı bir süreç olarak yeniden tasavvur edilmesi gerektiğini göstermektedir.</p></trans-abstract>
                                                                                                                                    <abstract><p>This paper examines the impact of digitalization on philosophy of communication, particularly in the context of self-other relationships, post-truth dynamics, and democratic deliberation. It argues that digital communication reshapes the conditions of dialogue by fostering epistemic fragmentation, digital tribalism, and the erosion of shared meaning. Drawing on Spinoza’s philosophy, the study challenges dualistic frameworks that separate mind andfrom? body, truth andfrom? persuasion, or reason and from?affect, proposing instead a relational approach to communication. The paper highlights how deliberative democracy and mutual aid face significant obstacles in an era dominated by misinformation, algorithmic filtering, and identity-driven discourse. By employing an interdisciplinary literature review, this study identifies the potential of Spinoza’s concept of potentia (power as capacity) as a theoretical foundation for rethinking agency, relationality, and communicative ethics in digital spaces. The findings suggest that addressing fragmentation requires promoting critical media literacy, encouraging dialogical engagement, and reconceptualizing communication as an embodied, interactive, and ethically responsive process.</p></abstract>
                                                            
            
                                                                                        <kwd-group>
                                                    <kwd>Digitalization</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Philosophy of Communication</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Other-Self</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Spinoza</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Digital Tribes</kwd>
                                            </kwd-group>
                            
                                                <kwd-group xml:lang="tr">
                                                    <kwd>Dijital Kabileler</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Dijitalleşme</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  İletişim Felsefesi</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Öteki-Ben</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Spinoza</kwd>
                                            </kwd-group>
                                                                                                                                        </article-meta>
    </front>
    <back>
                            <ref-list>
                                    <ref id="ref1">
                        <label>1</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Aghasaleh, R. (2019). (Un)building the wall: Reinventing ourselves as others in the post-truth era. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 34(3).</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref2">
                        <label>2</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Anderson, J. A., &amp; Baym, G. (2004). Philosophies and philosophic issues in communication, 1995–2004. Journal of Communication, 54(4), 589–615.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref3">
                        <label>3</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Aristoteles. (2017). Metafizik (A. Arslan, trans.). Sosyal Yayınlar.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref4">
                        <label>4</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Arnett, R. C. (2010). Defining philosophy of communication: Difference and identity. Qualitative Research Reports in Communication, 11(1), 57–62.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref5">
                        <label>5</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Bächtiger, A., Dryzek, J. S., Mansbridge, J., &amp; Warren, M. (2018). Deliberative democracy. The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy (ss. 1–32).</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref6">
                        <label>6</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Balibar, É. (2004). Spinoza ve siyaset (S. Soyarslan, trans.). Otonom.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref7">
                        <label>7</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Barnlund, D. C. (2020). Toward a meaning-centred philosophy of communication.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref8">
                        <label>8</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Shared Experiences in Human Communication (ss. 26–36). Routledge.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref9">
                        <label>9</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Cantzen, R. (1994). Daha az devlet daha çok toplum (V. Atayman, trans.). Ayrıntı.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref10">
                        <label>10</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Chambers, S. (2021). Truth, deliberative democracy, and the virtues of accuracy: Is fake news destroying the public sphere? Political Studies, 69(1), 147–163.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref11">
                        <label>11</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Chistyakova, O. (2017). Self and other in the communicative space of the global world. In 2nd International Conference on Contemporary Education, Social Sciences and Humanities (ICCESSH 2017) (ss. 6–11). Atlantis Press.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref12">
                        <label>12</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Cohen, J. (2007). Deliberative democracy. In S. W. Rosenberg (Ed.), Deliberation, participation and democracy: Can the people govern? (pp. 219–236). Palgrave Macmillan.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref13">
                        <label>13</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Cvar, N., &amp; Bobnič, R. (2019). Truth, post-truth, non-truth: New aestheticized digital regime of truth. In Post-truth and the mediation of reality: New conjunctures (pp. 79–103).</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref14">
                        <label>14</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Davidson, D. (1984). Inquiries into truth and interpretation. Oxford University Press.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref15">
                        <label>15</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Deleuze, G. (2005). Spinoza: Pratik felsefe (U. Baker, trans.). Norgunk.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref16">
                        <label>16</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Dresner, E. (2006). Davidson’s philosophy of communication. Communication Theory, 16(2), 155–172.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref17">
                        <label>17</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Fuchs, C. (2025). Antonio Negri, Spinoza, Marx, and digital capitalism. Philosophy &amp; Social Criticism. https://doi.org/10.1177/01914537241308108</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref18">
                        <label>18</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Fuller, S. (2022). Hakikat sonrası: Güç oyunu olarak bilgi (E. Bilgiç, trans.). Fol.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref19">
                        <label>19</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Goodchild, P. (2005). Deleuze &amp; Guattari: Arzu politikasına giriş (R. G. Öğdül, trans.). Ayrıntı.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref20">
                        <label>20</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Habermas, J. (2007). Moral consciousness and communicative action (C. Lenhardt &amp; S. W. Nicholsen, Trans.). Polity Press.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref21">
                        <label>21</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Harsin, J. (2018). Post-truth and critical communication studies. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication. https://doi.org/10.1093/acre- fore/9780190228613.013.757</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref22">
                        <label>22</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Kelly, J. (2017). A philosophy of communication. Communicatio Socialis, 14(3), 223–231.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref23">
                        <label>23</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Keyes, R. (2019). Hakikat sonrası çağ: Günümüz dünyasında yalancılık ve aldatma (D. Özçetin, trans.). Delidolu.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref24">
                        <label>24</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Khrystokin, G. V., &amp; Yastrebova, A. O. (2023). Is dialogue possible in the post- truth era? (Media philosophy and social and communication studies). Вісник Житомирського державного університету імені Івана Франка. Філософські науки, 93, 29–40.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref25">
                        <label>25</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Kropotkin, P. (2001). Karşılıklı yardımlaşma (İ. Ergüden &amp; D. Güneri, trans.). Kaos.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref26">
                        <label>26</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Nadler, S. (2013). Spinoza: Bir yaşam (A. Duman &amp; M. Başekim, trans.). İletişim.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref27">
                        <label>27</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Negri, A. (2013). Spinoza for our time: Politics and postmodernity. Columbia University Press.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref28">
                        <label>28</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Negri, A. (2020). Aykırı Spinoza: Gündem (deki/dışı) çeşitlemeler (N. Çelebioğlu &amp; E. Canaslan, trans.). Zoe.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref29">
                        <label>29</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Pinchevski, A. (2005). The ethics of interruption: Toward a Levinasian philosophy of communication. Social Semiotics, 15(2), 211–234.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref30">
                        <label>30</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Platon. (2010). Devlet (S. Eyüboğlu &amp; M. A. Cimcoz, trans.). Türkiye İş Bankası.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref31">
                        <label>31</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Spinoza, B. (1994). A Spinoza reader: The ethics and other works. Princeton University Press.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref32">
                        <label>32</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Timur, T. (2017). Habermas’ı okumak. Yordam Kitap.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref33">
                        <label>33</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Van Dyk, S. (2022). Post-truth, the future of democracy and the public sphere. Theory, Culture &amp; Society, 39(4), 37–50.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref34">
                        <label>34</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Wittgenstein, L. (1969). On certainty (G. E. M. Anscombe &amp; D. Paul, Eds. &amp; Trans.). Harper &amp; Row.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref35">
                        <label>35</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Yılmaz, Ö. (2022). Kıyamet yakındır filmi bağlamında faşizm kavramı ve palingenetik mitler: Dekonstrüktif bir inceleme. Kurgu, 30(1), 1–26.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref36">
                        <label>36</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Yılmaz, Ö. (2023). Popülizm, hakikat sonrası (post-truth) ve komplo teorileri: Siyasetin geleceği mi? Praksis Güncel. https://praksisguncel.org/populizm-haki- kat-sonrasi-post-truth-ve-komplo-teorileri-siyasetin-gelecegi-mi/ (Erişim tarihi: 15 Ocak 2025).</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                            </ref-list>
                    </back>
    </article>
