HUMAN RIGHTS IN THEORETICAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL SENSES

Yıl 2014, Sayı: 18, 189 - 204, 01.12.2014

Dilek Yigit

Öz

This essay aims to shed light on how the definition of human rights in theoretical and philosophical senses has been given and certain conceptual problems arising from different perceptions taken to define what human rights are and to identify to whom human rights belong. In analysing the concept of human rights in theoretical and philosophical senses, the historical approach is followed in the article given that historical approach demonstrates how the concept of human rights has gone beyond theoretical and philosophical debates and become legal and political issues and internationalised over time

Anahtar Kelimeler

the concept of human rights, natural law, legal positivism, internationalisation of human rights

HUMAN RIGHTS IN THEORETICAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL SENSES

Öz

Bu makalenin amacı, tarih boyunca insan hakları kavramının teorik ve felsefi açıdan nasıl tanımlandığına ve insan hakları kavramının tanımını etkileyen farklı bakış açılarından kaynaklanan kavramsal sorunlara kısaca ışık tutabilmektir. İnsan hakları uygulamalarını konu almayan bu makalede, insan hakları kavramının zamanla teorik ve felsefi tartışma konusu olmaktan çıkarak politik ve hukuki mesele haline dönüştüğünü gösterebilmek açısından tarihsel perspektif benimsenmiştir

Anahtar Kelimeler

insan hakları kavramı, doğal hukuk, legal pozitivizm, insan haklarının uluslararasılaşması

Kaynakça

• Buchanan, A. Justice, Legitimacy, and Self-Determination: Moral Foundations for International Law, Oxford University Press, United States, 2004.
• Burgers, J. H. “The Road to San Francisco: The Revival of the Human Rights Idea in the Twentieth Century,” Human Rights Quarterly, Vol.14, No.4, 1992, s. 447-477.
• Encyclopedia Britannica, Canon Law.
• Erendor, M. E., Human Rights and Its Paradoxes, Strategic Outlook, 2012.
• Escamilla, M., Rights and Utilitarianism. John Stuart Mill’s Role in its history, http://etudes-benthamiennes.revues.org/192, 2008.
• Feinberg, J. “The Nature and Value of Rights”, The Journal of Value Inquiry, 4, p.243-257.
• Fields, A.B. Rethinking Human Rights for the New Millennium, Palgrave, England, 2003.
• Friedman, L. M. “The Internationalization of Human Rights by David P. Forsythe” Boston College Third World Law Journal, Vo.13, No.1, 1993, p.188-198.
• Forsythe, D. P., Human Rights and World Politics, University of Nebraska Press, 1983.
• Goldewijk, B.K., and Fortman,B., Where Needs Meet Rights, Geneva: WWC Publications, 1999.
• Griffin, J., “Rights in Conflict” in Rights in Reason, M. Friedman, L. May, K. Parsons, J. Stiff (eds), Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, 2000.
• Harries, R. “The Complementarity Between Secular and Religious Perspectives of Human Rights” in Does God Believe Human Rights?, N. Ghanea, A. Stephens and R. Walden (eds.), Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2007, p.19-27.
• Henle S. J., R. J., “A Catholic View of Human Rights: A Thomistic Reflection”, in The Philosophy of Human Rights: International Perspectives, A.S. Rosenbaum (ed), Greenwood Press, 1980, p.87-93.
• Hersch, Jeanne “Human Rights in Western thought: conflicting dimensions” in Philosophical Foundations of Human Rights, edited by UNESCO, 1986.
• Hohfeld, W. N., Fundamental Legal Conceptions, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1923.
• Ishay, M. R., The History of Human Rights: From Ancient Times to the Globalization Area, University of California Press, 2008.
• Jones, P. “Human Rights, Group Rights, and Peoples’ Rights”, Human Rights Quarterly, Vol. 21, No.1, 1999, p.80-107.
• Kapur, R. “Human Rights in the 21th Century: Take a Walk on the Dark Side”, Sydney Law Review, Vol. 28, 2006, p.664-687. Kuttner, Stephen, Natural Law and Canon Law, http://scholarship.law.nd.edu.
• Lewis, Hackett, The European Dream Of Progress and Enlightenment, http://history-world.org/age_of_enlightenment.htm, 1992.
• Lyotard, J. F., Postmodern Durum, İsmet Birkan (çev.), BilgeSu Yayıncılık, 2013.
• Melzer, Arthur M. “Rousseau’s Moral Realism: Replacing Natural Law with the General Will”, The American Political Science Review, Vol.77, No.3, 1983, p.633-651.
• Neumayer, E. “Do International Human Treaties Improve Respect for Human Rights”, Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol.49, No. 6, p. 925-953.
• Nickel, J. W., Making Sense of Human Rights: Philosophical Reflections on the Universal, University of California Press, California, 1987.
• Orend, B., Human Rights: Concept and Context, Broadview Press, Canada, 2002.
• Ossenbrink, Jan and Stephan, Annegret What is the difference between social and natural sciences?, 2013, http://www.tim.ethz.ch/education/courses/courses_fs_2013/DocS em_Fall13/3_presentation.
• http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/human-being.
• Pae, J., “Sovereignty, Power, and Human Rights Treaties: An Economic Analysis, Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights, Vol. 5, No.1, 2006, p. 70-95.
• Rosenbaum, A.S., The Philosophy of Human Rights: International Perspectives, Greenwood Press, 1980.
• Sen, A., “Elements of a Theory of Human Rights”, Philosophy and Public Affairs, Vol.32, No.4, 2004, p.315-356.
• Sharma, I. C., “Human Rights and Comprehensive Humanism”, in The Philosophy of Human Rights: International Perspectives, Greenwood Press, 1980.
• Sharma, I. C., “Human Rights and Comprehensive Humanism”, in The Philosophy of Human Rights: International Perspectives, Greenwood Press, 1980.
• Soon Tay, A. E. “Human Rights and Wrongs”, in Rights in Reason, M. Fiedman, L. May, K. Parsons, J. Stiff 8eds.), Kluwer Academic Publications, The Netherlands, 2000.
• Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Kant’s Moral Philosophy.
• Totaro, Martin V. “Legal Positivism, Constructivism, an International Human Rights Law: The Case of Participatory Development”, Virginia Journal of International Law, Vol.48, No.4, 2008, p. 719-765.
• Weale, A., Democracy, Palgrave MacMillan, England, 2007.