Air quality index calculation and analysis of pollutant impacts in Ardahan, Türkiye

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate air quality in Ardahan, a province located in the northeastern part of Türkiye, based on the pollutants PM₁₀, SO₂, and O₃ measured throughout 2024. Air Quality Index (AQI) values were calculated on an hourly, daily, and monthly scale, and the percentage contribution of each pollutant to the AQI was analyzed. According to the data, a total of 123 risky hours were identified where the AQI exceeded 100, a level considered unhealthy for sensitive groups. In all of these hours, the dominant pollutant was determined to be PM₁₀. The results indicate that PM₁₀ was the most influential pollutant on AQI throughout the year, particularly during winter months when high humidity and emissions from heating contributed to increased concentrations. However, from the perspective of daily average AQI values, only 3 days exceeded the threshold of 100. This suggests that while high pollution levels occurred during certain hours of some days, these peaks were not widespread enough to elevate the daily average beyond the threshold. O₃ became more prominent during summer months due to increased photochemical reactions, although it occasionally appeared as the dominant pollutant in certain periods due to data unavailability. The contribution of SO₂ to the AQI remained at a relatively low level. These findings provide important insights for air quality management and environmental policy development. They highlight how critical the issue of missing data is in AQI prediction. Therefore, it is suggested that artificial intelligence and machine learning-based models, which can produce reliable predictions even with incomplete data, are essential tools for improving air pollution early warning systems.

Keywords

• Air quality index
• ozone
• particulate matter
• sulphur dioxide
• rural area

References

1. Arslan, H., Agir, A., & Demir, G. (2024). Impacts of PM10 exposure on hospitalization for acute bronchitis in Ankara, Türkiye. Frontiers in Life Sciences and Related Technologies, 5(1), 1-5.
2. Ansari, M., & Alam, M. (2024). An intelligent IoT-cloud-based air pollution forecasting model using univariate time-series analysis. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 49(3), 3135-3162.
3. Barlik, N., Guliyev, R., & Akgün, M. (2024). 2019-2023 döneminde Ardahan’da başlıca hava kirletici parametrelerinin seviyeleri ve hava kalitesi indeksine etkileri. Journal of Studies in Advanced Technologies, 2(2), 83-94.
4. Bishoi, B., Prakash, A., & Jain, V. K. (2009). A comparative study of air quality index based on factor analysis and US-EPA methods for an urban environment. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 9(1), 1-17.
5. Donzelli, G., & Suarez-Varela, M. M. (2024). Tropospheric ozone: A critical review of the literature on emissions, exposure, and health effects. Atmosphere, 15(7), 779.
6. Durán Boneth, G. A., Costaguta, R., & Rico-Bautista, D. (2024). ANN-based prototype for the prediction of CO₂ pollution levels: Eco-Logica. In Proceedings of the 22nd LACCEI International Multi-Conference for Engineering, Education and Technology. Latin American and Caribbean Consortium of Engineering Institutions. Eke, M., Cingiroglu, F., & Kaynak, B. (2024). Investigation of 2021 wildfire impacts on air quality in Southwestern Turkey. Atmospheric Environment, 325, 120445. Ghale, Y. A. G., Tayanc, M., & Unal, A. (2021). Dried bottom of Urmia Lake as a new source of dust in northwestern Iran: Understanding the impacts on local and regional air quality. Atmospheric Environment, 262, 118635.
7. Gogikar, P., Tyagi, B., & Gorai, A. K. (2019). Seasonal prediction of particulate matter over the steel city of India using neural network models. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 5(1), 227-243.
8. Han, J., Liu, H., Xiong, H., & Yang, J. (2023). Semi-supervised air quality forecasting via self-supervised hierarchical graph neural network. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 35(5), 5230-5243.

9. Horn, S. A., & Dasgupta, P. K. (2024). The air quality index (AQI) in historical and analytical perspective: A tutorial review. Talanta, 267, 125260.
10. Janarthanan, R., Partheeban, P., Somasundaram, K., & Navin Elamparithi, P. (2021). A deep learning approach for prediction of air quality index in a metropolitan city. Sustainable Cities and Society, 67, 102720.
11. Kamal, M. M., Jailani, R., & Shauri, R. L. A. (2006). Prediction of ambient air quality based on neural network technique. In Proceedings of the 2006 4th Student Conference on Research and Development (pp. 115-119). IEEE.
12. Kara, Y., Yakut Şevik, S. E., & Toros, H. (2024). Comprehensive analysis of air pollution and the influence of meteorological factors: A case study of Adıyaman Province. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 196(6), 525.
13. Kingsy, R. G., & Manju, S. (2019). A comprehensive review of wireless sensor networks based air pollution monitoring systems. Wireless Personal Communications, 108(4), 2499-2515.
14. Krishan, M., Jha, S., Das, J., Singh, A., Goyal, M. K., & Sekar, C. (2019). Air quality modelling using long short-term memory (LSTM) over NCT-Delhi, India. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 12(8), 899-908.
15. Li, Z., & Yang, J. (2010). PM-25 forecasting using reconstruct phase space LS-SVM. In Proceedings of the 2010 2nd Conference on Environmental Science and Information Application Technology (Vol. 1, pp. 143-146). IEEE.
16. Liu, H., Yan, G., Duan, Z., & Chen, C. (2021). Intelligent modeling strategies for forecasting air quality time series: A review. Applied Soft Computing, 102, 106957.
17. Matar, H. B., Al-Otaibi, F. A., Almutairi, S. K., & Alhubail, J. A. (2024). Air quality in Kuwait urban areas. Environmental Quality Management, 33(3), 555-566. MGM, (2024). Türkiye average humidity. Meteoroloji Genel Müdürlüğü,
18. https://www.mgm.gov.tr/FILES/resmi-istatistikler/parametre Analizi/ 2024-ortalama-nem.pdf Mishra, A., & Gupta, Y. (2024). Comparative analysis of air quality index prediction using deep learning algorithms. Spatial Information Research, 32(1), 63-72.
19. Mo, X., Zhang, L., Li, H., & Qu, Z. (2019). A novel air quality early-warning system based on artificial intelligence. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(19), 3505.
20. Mushtaq, Z., Bangotra, P., Gautam, A. S., Sharma, M., Suman, Gautam, S., Singh, K., Kumar, Y., & Jain, P. (2024). Satellite or ground-based measurements for air pollutants (PM2.5, PM10, SO2, NO2, O3) data and their health hazards: Which is most accurate and why? Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 196(4), 342.
21. Natarajan, S. K., Shanmurthy, P., Arockiam, D., Balusamy, B., & Selvarajan, S. (2024). Optimized machine learning model for air quality index prediction in major cities in India. Scientific Reports, 14, 6795.
22. Oguz, K., & Pekin, M. A. (2024). Prediction of air pollution with machine learning algorithms. Turkish Journal of Science and Technology, 19(1), 1-12.
23. Oruc, I. (2022). Long-range transport and potential source regions of PM2.5 during the autumn season in Edirne, Türkiye. Frontiers in Life Sciences and Related Technologies, 3(3), 95-100.
24. Ozdemir, E. T., Birinci, E., & Deniz, A. (2024). Multi-source observations on the effect of atmospheric blocking on air quality in İstanbul: A study case. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 196(8), 698.
25. Pekdogan, T., Udriștioiu, M. T., Yildizhan, H., & Ameen, A. (2024). From local issues to global impacts: Evidence of air pollution for Romania and Turkey. Sensors, 24(4), 1320.
26. Peng, H., Lima, A. R., Teakles, A., Jin, J., Cannon, A. J., & Hsieh, W. W. (2017). Evaluating hourly air quality forecasting in Canada with nonlinear updatable machine learning methods. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 10(2), 195-211.
27. Pope, C. A. III, Burnett, R. T., Thun, M. J., Calle, E. E., Krewski, D., Ito, K., & Thurston, G. D. (2002). Lung cancer, cardiopulmonary mortality, and long-term exposure to fine particulate air pollution. JAMA, 287(9), 1132-1141.
28. Qiao, D., Yao, J., Zhang, J., Li, X., Mi, T., & Zeng, W. (2022). Short-term air quality forecasting model based on hybrid RF-IACA-BPNN algorithm. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(26), 39164-39181.
29. Sahin, H. (2025). Legal regulations for the protection of air quality in Turkey. Journal of Shura Academy, 9, 45-54.
30. SIM, (2025). Continuous monitoring center, Republic of Türkiye, Ministry of Environment, Urbanization, and Climate Change. https://sim.csb.gov.tr/SERVICES/airquality
31. Wahid, H., Ha, Q. P., & Duc, H. N. (2011). Computational intelligence estimation of natural background ozone level and its distribution for air quality modelling and emission control. In Proceedings of the 28th ISARC, Seoul, Korea (pp. 1157-1163).
32. Wang, P., Guo, H., Hu, J., Kota, S. H., Ying, Q., & Zhang, H. (2019). Responses of PM2.5 and O₃ concentrations to changes of meteorology and emissions in China. Science of the Total Environment, 662, 297-306.
33. Yavuz, V. (2025). Unveiling the impact of temperature inversions on air quality: A comprehensive analysis of polluted and severely polluted days in Istanbul. Acta Geophysica, 73(1), 969-986.
34. Zhang, Y., Chen, J., Yang, H., Li, R., & Yu, Q. (2017). Seasonal variation and potential source regions of PM2.5-bound PAHs in the megacity Beijing, China: Impact of regional transport. Environmental Pollution, 231(Pt 1), 329338.