Gaziantep Medical Journal

2148-3132 2148-2926

Gaziantep Üniversitesi

Utility of blood gas values in place of biochemical values in emergency department

Acil serviste kan gazı değerlerinin biyokimyasal değerler yerine kullanılabilirliği

Öner

Nuran

Köse

Ataman

Armağan

Erol

Sert

Çınar Pınar

Balcı

Arif Kadri

İnal

Taylan

04 01 2012

18 3 155 159 08 16 2014

1990

Gaziantep Medical Journal

It is aimed to investigate the utility of blood gas electrolyte and glucose values in place of biochemical electrolyte and glucose values in Emergency Department (ED). The group of patients, whose blood gas electrolyte , glucose and also biochemical electrolyte and glucose values were examined, These data were derived from 1007 patients at the age of 18 and older, who were admitted to Uludag University ED and whose blood gas values were examined between July 2011 and October 2011. While biochemistry K+ median was 4,2 mmol/L, blood gas K+ median was 3,86 mmol/L. When blood gas and biochemical K+ values were compared, average difference was -0,4 mmol/L (95% confidence limits: -1,5-0,7 mmol/L) and correlation coefficient was r=0.794 (p

Bu çalışmanın amacı acil serviste kan gazı elektrolit ve glukoz değerlerinin biyokimyasal elektrolit ve glukoz değerleri yerine kullanılabilirliğini araştırmaktır. Uludağ Üniversitesi Acil servisine Temmuz 2011 ile Ekim 2011 tarihleri arasında başvuran ve acil serviste kan gazı bakılan 18 yaş ve üzeri 1007 hastadan; kan gazı elektrolit ve glukoz ile biyokimyasal elektrolit ve glukoz değerlerinin bakıldığı grup çalışmaya alınmıştır. Biyokimya K+ ortanca:4,2 mmol/L iken, kan gazı K+ ortanca:3,86 mmol/L idi. Kan gazı ve biyokimyasal K+ değerleri karşılaştırıldığında ortalama fark -0,4 mmol/L (%95 uyum sınırları: -1,5-0,7 mmol/L), korelasyon katsayısı (r=0,794 p

Acil servis biyokimyasal elektrolitler glukoz kan gazı

1. Sterns RH, Cappuccio JD, Silver SM, Cohen EP. Neurologic sequelae after treatment of severe hyponatremia: A multicenter perspective. J Am Soc Nephrol 1994;4:1522–30.

2. Price CP. Medical and economic outcomes of point of care testing. Clin Chem Lab Med 2002;40:246–51.

3. Cox CJ. Acute care testing. Bood gases and electrolytes at the point of care. Clin Lab Med 2001;21:321–35.

4. Flegar-Mestric Z, Perkov S. Comparability of point of care whole blood electrolyte and substrate testing using a Stat Profile Critical Care Xpress analyzer and standard laboratory methods. Clin Chem Lab Med 2006;44:898–903.

5. Pungor E. Working mechanism of ion-selective electrodes. Pure & Appl Chem 1992;64:503–7.

6. Capasso G, Unwin R. Laboratory investigations: Electrolytes and acid–base: common fluid and electrolyte disorders In Renal. Medicine 2011;39:317-24.

7. Bozkurt S, Altunören O, Kurutaş EB, Doğan M. Venöz kan gazı potasyum sonuçları ile laboratuar potasyum sonuçlarının karşılaştırılması. JAEM 2012;11:73-6.

8. Wongyingsinn M, Suksuriyayothin S. Use of rapid ABG analyzer in measurement of potassium concentration: does it agree with venous potassium concentration? J Med Assoc Thai 2009;92:925-9.

9. Menchine M,Probst MA, Agy C, Bach D, Arora S. Diagnostic accuracy of venous blood gas electrolytes for identifying diabetic ketoacidosis in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 2011;18:1105-8.

10. Leino A,Kurvinen K. Interchangeability of blood gas, electrolyte and metabolite results measured with point-of-care, blood gas and core laboratory analyzers. Clin Chem Lab Med 2011;49:1187-91.

11. Jain A, Subhan I, Joshi M. Comparison of the point-of-care blood gas analyzer versus the laboratory auto-analyzer for the measurement of electrolytes. Int J Emerg Med 2009;2:117–20.