A New Greedy Algorithm For Influence Maximization On Signed Social Networks
Abstract
The social influence is one of the major phenomenons that shapes people's decisions. In this respect, Influence Maximization (IM) problem is one of the most attractive research topics in the social network analysis because its practical benefits in viral marketing, public opinions shaping etc. The IM problem aims to maximize the spread of an influence (e.g. an opinion, an advertisement) in a social network by using a small number of the most effective individuals, whom is called influencers. Detecting the influencers is the NP-Hard combinatorial optimization problem in most cases. Therefore, many algorithms have been and are being developed for the IM problem. However, the algorithms have not yet achieved to the desired solution quality and speed. In this study, we focused on the signed IM problem that is considers both positive and negative influence between the individuals. For this purpose, we developed a greedy algorithm called the Elitist Greedy Algorithm (EGA) for detecting influencers set. We compared the EGA’s performance on 2 public datasets with random seed selection, out degree heuristic, and one state-of-the-art greedy algorithm. The EGA outperforms the competitors in terms of the achieved total influence.
Keywords
Influence maximization,online social networks,information diffusion,greedy algorithm
References
- G. A. Tong, S. Li, W. Wu, and D.-Z. Du, “Effector Detection in Social Networks,” IEEE Trans. Comput. Soc. Syst., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 151–163, Dec. 2016.
- D. Kempe, J. Kleinberg, and É. Tardos, “Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network,” in Proceedings of the ninth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining - KDD ’03, 2003, p. 137.
- T. Lappas, E. Terzi, D. Gunopulos, and H. Mannila, “Finding effectors in social networks,” in Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining - KDD ’10, 2010, p. 1059.
- M. Samadi, R. Nagi, A. Semenov, and A. Nikolaev, “Seed activation scheduling for influence maximization in social networks,” Omega, vol. 77, pp. 96–114, Jun. 2018.
- D. Li, C. Wang, S. Zhang, G. Zhou, D. Chu, and C. Wu, “Positive influence maximization in signed social networks based on simulated annealing,” Neurocomputing, vol. 260, pp. 69–78, Oct. 2017.
- D. Li, Z.-M. Xu, N. Chakraborty, A. Gupta, K. Sycara, and S. Li, “Polarity Related Influence Maximization in Signed Social Networks,” PLoS One, vol. 9, no. 7, p. e102199, Jul. 2014.
- X. Weng, Z. Liu, and Z. Li, “An Efficient Influence Maximization Algorithm Considering Both Positive and Negative Relationships,” in 2016 IEEE Trustcom/BigDataSE/ISPA, 2016, pp. 1931–1936.
- M. Talluri, H. Kaur, and J. S. He, “Influence maximization in social networks: Considering both positive and negative relationships,” in 2015 International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems (CTS), 2015, pp. 479–480.
- H. Zhang, T. N. Dinh, and M. T. Thai, “Maximizing the Spread of Positive Influence in Online Social Networks,” in 2013 IEEE 33rd International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, 2013, pp. 317–326.
- A. Nazemian and F. Taghiyareh, “Influence maximization in Independent Cascade model with positive and negative word of mouth,” in 6th International Symposium on Telecommunications (IST), 2012, pp. 854–860.
