Okul İklimi Ölçeği: Ortaokul ve Lise Öğrencileri İçin Uyarlama, Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 3, 1642 - 1664

Ahmet Çağlar Özdoğan , İlhan Yalçın

https://doi.org/10.46778/goputeb.1666153

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, White ve arkadaşları (2014) tarafından geliştirilen Okul İklimi Ölçeği’ni Türkçeye uyarlamaktır. Ölçeğin geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmaları iki farklı grupta yürütülmüştür. İlk katılımcı grubu ortaokul öğrencilerinden, ikinci katılımcı grubu ise lise öğrencilerinden oluşmuştur. Bu bağlamda, Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı’na bağlı çeşitli okullarda öğrenim gören ortaokul ve lise öğrencileri uygun örnekleme yöntemiyle seçilerek araştırma örneklemine dahil edilmiştir. Her iki örneklem grubunda da ölçeğin yapısının doğrulanıp doğrulanmadığını test etmek için Doğrulayıcı Faktör Analizi (DFA) yapılmıştır. DFA sonuçları, elde edilen değerlerin iyi bir model uyumu gösterdiğini ortaya koymuştur. Okul İklimi Ölçeği’nin iç tutarlık katsayıları Cronbach Alpha güvenirlik katsayısı ile hesaplanmıştır. Buna göre, iç tutarlık katsayısı ortaokul öğrencileri için .83, lise öğrencileri için .82 ve tüm örneklem için .83 olarak bulunmuştur. İç tutarlık katsayılarının belirlenmesinin ardından ölçeğin test-tekrar test güvenirliği de hesaplanmıştır. Test-tekrar test güvenirliği ortaokul grubu için .74, lise grubu için .78 ve tüm örneklem için .77 olarak bulunmuştur. Araştırma sonucunda, Okul İklimi Ölçeği’nin ortaokul ve lise öğrencilerinin değerlendirilmesi için geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracı olduğu belirlenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Okul İklimi , Geçerlik , Güvenirlik , Ortaokul , Lise Öğrencileri

Etik Beyan

Etik kurul izni, Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Etik Kurulundan 30.03.2020 tarihli 3 numaralı toplantının 55 numaralı karar sayısında onaylanarak alınmıştır.

Proje Numarası

-

School Climate Scale: Adaptation, Validity, and Reliability Study for Middle and High School Students

Öz

This study aimed to adapt the School Climate Scale, originally developed by White et al. (2014), into Turkish. The validity and reliability studies of the scale were conducted on two different groups. The first participant group consisted of middle school students, while the second group comprised high school students. In this context, middle and high school students from various schools affiliated with the Ministry of National Education were selected using an appropriate sampling method and included in the study sample. To test whether the structure was confirmed in both sample groups, Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was conducted. The CFA results indicated that the obtained values demonstrated a good model fit. The internal consistency coefficients of the School Climate Scale were calculated using Cronbach’s Alpha reliability coefficient. Accordingly, the internal consistency coefficient was found to be .83 for middle school students, .82 for high school students, and .83 for the entire sample. After determining the internal consistency coefficients, the test-retest reliability of the scale was also calculated. The test-retest reliability was found to be .74 for the middle school group, .78 for the high school group, and .77 for the entire sample. As a result of the study, the School Climate Scale was determined to be a valid and reliable measurement tool for assessing middle and high school students.

Anahtar Kelimeler

School Climate , Validity , Reliability , Middle School , High School Students

Etik Beyan

Ethics committee permission was obtained from Ankara University Social Sciences Ethics Committee with the approval of decision number 55 of the meeting number 3 dated 30.03.2020.

Destekleyen Kurum

-

Proje Numarası

-

Teşekkür

-

Kaynakça

• Aldridge, J. M., & McChesney, K. (2018). The relationships between school climate and adolescent mental health and wellbeing: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Research, 88, 121-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2018.01.012
• Astuti, B., Mufrihah, A., & Alfiah, L. (2019). How school climate aspects affect the development of adolescence’s psychological well-being. KnE Social Sciences, 3(17), 284–295. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i17.4650
• Başol, G. (2013). Eğitimde Ölçme ve Değerlendirme [Measurement and Evaluation in Education]. Pegem Akademi.
• Bizumic, B., Reynolds, K. J., Turner, J. C., Bromhead, D., & Subasic, E. (2009). The role of the group in individual functioning: School identification and the psychological well-being of staff and students. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 58(1), 171–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00387.x
• Brown, T. A. (2015). Methodology in the social sciences. Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2019). 5 most viewed public health stories in 2019 from CDC’s center for global health. https://www.cdc.gov/globalhealth/stories/top-2019-public-health-stories-cdc-center-for-global-health.html
• Cohen, J., McCabe, E. M., Michelli, N. M., & Pickeral, T. (2009). School climate: Research, policy, practice, and teacher education. Teachers College Record, 111(1), 180–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810911100108
• Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G. ve Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2012). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Çok Değişkenli İstatistik: SPSS ve Lisrel Uygulamalar [Multivariate Statistics for Social Sciences: SPSS and LISREL Applications]. Pegem Akademi.
• Gage, N. A., Larson, A., Sugai, G., & Chafouleas, S. M. (2016). Student perceptions of school climate as predictors of office discipline referrals. American Educational Research Journal, 53(3), 492–515. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216637349
• Hamilton, S. F., & Hamilton, M. A. (2006). School, work, and emerging adulthood. In J. J. Arnett & J. L. Tanner (Eds.), Emerging adults in America: Coming of age in the 21st century (pp. 257–277). American Psychological Association.
• Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60.
• Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2010). Eğitim yönetimi: Teori, araştırma ve uygulama (S. Turan, Çev. Ed.). Nobel Yayıncılık.
• Hu, L. T, & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
• Huang, H. M, Xiao, L. & Huang, D. H. (2013). Students’ ratings of school climate and school belonging for understanding their effects and relationship of junior high schools in Taiwan. Global Journal of Human Social Science Linguistics & Education, 13(3), 24-35.
• Kline, R. B. (2011). Methodology in the social sciences. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
• Kuperminc, G. P., Leadbeater, B. J., & Blatt, S. J. (2001). School social climate and individual differences in vulnerability to psychopathology among middle school students. Journal of School Psychology, 39(2), 141–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4405(01)00059-0
• Lester, L., & Cross, D. (2015). The relationship between school climate and mental and emotional wellbeing over the transition from primary to secondary school. Psychology of Well-Being, 5(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13612-015-0037-8
• Loukas, A., & Robinson, S. (2004). Examining the moderating role of perceived school climate in early adolescent adjustment. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 14(2), 209–233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2004.01402004.x
• Randolph, J. J., Kangas, M., & Ruokamo, H. (2009). The preliminary development of the children's overall satisfaction with schooling scale. Child Indicators Research, 2(1), 79-93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-008-9027-1
• Ruus, V.-R., Veisson, M., Leino, M., Ots, L., Pallas, L., Sarv, E.-S., & Veisson, A. (2007). Students’ well-being, coping, academic success, and school climate. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 35(7), 919-936. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2007.35.7.919
• Sousa, V. D., & Rojjanasrirat, W. (2011). Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: A clear and user-friendly guideline. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 17, 268-274. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01434.x
• Stevens, J. P. (2009). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (5th ed.). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
• Şencan, H. (2005). Sosyal ve Davranışsal Ölçümlerde Güvenilirlik ve Geçerlilik [Reliability and Validity in Social and Behavioral Measurements]. Seçkin Yayıncılık.
• Şimşek, Ö. F. (2007). Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesine Giriş, Temel İlkeler ve LISREL Uygulamaları [Introduction to Structural Equation Modeling: Basic Principles and LISREL Applications]. Ekinoks Yayıncılık.
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6. ed.) Pearson.
• Telef, B. (2014). Çocuklar için kapsamlı okul doyumu ölçeği’nin Türkçeye uyarlama çalışması [The adaptation study of the Comprehensive School Satisfaction Scale for Children into Turkish]. Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama, 10(2), 478-490. https://doi.org/10.17244/eku.43152
• Thapa, A., Cohen, J., Guffey, S., & Higgins-D’Alessandro, A. (2013). A review of school climate research. Review of Educational Research, 83 (3), 357–385. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313483907
• Turner, I., Reynolds, K. J., Lee, E., Subasic, E., Bromhead, D. (2014). Well-being, school climate and the social identity process: A latent growth model study of bullying perpetration and peer victimization. School Psychology Quarterly, 29(3), 320–335. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000074
• Wang, M. T., & Degol, J. L. (2016). School climate: A review of the construct, measurement, and impact on student outcomes. Educational Psychology Review, 28(2), 315-352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9319-1
• Way, N., Reddy, R., & Rhodes, J. (2007). Students' perceptions of school climate during the middle school years: Associations with trajectories of psychological and behavioral adjustment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 40(3-4), 194-213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-007-9143-y
• Weir, C. J. (2005). Language testing and validation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
• White, N., La Salle, T., Ashby, J. S., & Meyers, J. (2014). A brief measure of adolescent perceptions of school climate. School Psychology Quarterly, 29(3), 349–359. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000075
• Zullig, K. J., Koopman, T. M., Patton, J. M., & Ubbes, V. A. (2010). School climate: historical review, ınstrument development, and school assessment. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 28(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282909344205