Feasibility Assessment of a Microfluidic Chip Platform for SH-SY5Y Cell Culture under Static Conditions
Abstract
Establishing baseline biocompatibility under static conditions is essential before dynamic perfusion studies. This study evaluates whether a custom microfluidic platform can support neuronal cell culture under controlled static conditions. A custom PMMA-glass microfluidic chip was evaluated for SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cell culture, using a conventional polystyrene flask as a control to compare substrate compatibility under equivalent conditions. Cells were cultured statically for 24 hours with equivalent cell density and volume (12,000 cells; 64 µL). Morphological observations assessed cell adhesion, spreading, and structural characteristics. For quantitative analysis, cells were manually counted from randomly acquired microscopy images (representing technical replicates) and mathematically extrapolated to the total 32 mm² culture area. Visual evaluations confirm homogeneous cell distribution with characteristic neurite-like extensions across both surfaces. From the initial 12,000 cells, the extrapolated final cell count was 17,967 for the conventional flask and 18,691 for the microfluidic chip. This demonstrates comparable cell attachment and a slightly higher cell yield on the chip platform. The PMMA-glass microfluidic chip provides a biocompatible microenvironment that supports SH-SY5Y cell attachment and a comparable increase in observed cell number under static conditions relative to conventional polystyrene. These results validate the platform's suitability for neuronal cell culture, establishing a robust foundation for future dynamic, perfusion-based neurobiological studies.
Keywords
biocompatibility, cell culture techniques, ın vitro techniques, microfluidics, SH-SY5Y
Supporting Institution
The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Ethical Statement
Ethics committee approval was not required for this study due to the nature of the experimental design. However, all procedures were conducted in accordance with relevant ethical principles.
Thanks
This study includes cell culture applications performed on the microfluidic chip developed within the PhD project of Gözde Narin. Gözde Narin is supported under the YÖK 100/2000 Doctoral Scholarship Program (Human Brain and Neuroscience) and the TÜBİTAK 2211-C Priority Areas Doctoral Scholarship Program (Microsystems). The authors would like to thank the Foot-and-Mouth Disease Institute (ŞAP Institute) for granting permission to conduct the experiments in their laboratories and for providing the cell line used in this study.
References
- Bastiaens, A., Sabahi-Kaviani, R., & Luttge, R. (2020). Nanogrooves for 2D and 3D Microenvironments of SH-SY5Y Cultures in Brain-on-Chip Technology. Frontiers in Neuroscience, Volume 14 - 2020. doi:10.3389/fnins.2020.00666
- Becker, H., & Locascio, L. E. (2002). Polymer microfluidic devices. Talanta, 56(2), 267-287. doi: 10.1016/s0039-9140(01)00594-x
- Berdondini, L., Chiappalone, M., van der Wal, P. D., Imfeld, K., de Rooij, N. F., Koudelka-Hep, M., . . . Garenne, A. (2006). A microelectrode array (MEA) integrated with clustering structures for investigating in vitro neurodynamics in confined interconnected sub-populations of neurons. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 114(1), 530-541. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2005.04.042
- Bhatia, S. N., & Ingber, D. E. (2014). Microfluidic organs-on-chips. Nature Biotechnology, 32(8), 760-772. doi:10.1038/nbt.2989
- Biedler, J. L., Roffler-Tarlov, S., Schachner, M., & Freedman, L. S. (1978). Multiple neurotransmitter synthesis by human neuroblastoma cell lines and clones. Cancer Res, 38(11 Pt 1), 3751-3757. PMID: 29704
- Freshney, R. I. (2015). Culture of animal cells: a manual of basic technique and specialized applications: John Wiley & Sons. doi: 10.1002/9781118873656
- Halldorsson, S., Lucumi, E., Gómez-Sjöberg, R., & Fleming, R. M. T. (2015). Advantages and challenges of microfluidic cell culture in polydimethylsiloxane devices. Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 63, 218-231. doi:10.1016/j.bios.2014.07.029
- Huh, D., Hamilton, G. A., & Ingber, D. E. (2011). From 3D cell culture to organs-on-chips. Trends in Cell Biology, 21(12), 745-754. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2011.09.005
- Hwang, J., Cho, Y. H., Park, M. S., & Kim, B. H. (2019). Microchannel fabrication on glass materials for microfluidic devices. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 20(3), 479-495. doi: 10.1007/s12541-019-00049-y
- Ingber, D. E. (2016). Reverse engineering human pathophysiology with organs-on-chips. Cell, 164(6), 1105-1109. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.02.049