Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Comparative Analysis of P & O and RBFN MPPT Controller Based Three Level SEPIC Topology for 1.2kW Solar PV System

Year 2019, Volume: 32 Issue: 3, 853 - 869, 01.09.2019
https://doi.org/10.35378/gujs.375313

Abstract

This paper accords an intelligent controller based 3-level SEPIC configuration for energy transformation in the solar PV system. An artificial intelligence based radial basis function network is engaged as a control algorithm for the maximum power extraction and the converter control can be done based on the duty cycle generated by the controller. In this system, a SEPIC topology is used for high voltage gain with reduced switching losses. In this paper, an RBFN controller based 3-level SEPIC topology is designed for 1.2kW solar PV system over the traditional P & O (Perturb & Observe) control method and the comparative result analysis is done though the simulation output for the corresponding input parameters.

References

  • [1]. Joshi KA, Pindoriya NM. Impact investigation of rooftop Solar PV system: A case study in India. In2012 3rd IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Europe (ISGT Europe) 2012 Oct 14 (pp. 1-8). IEEE. [2]. Kumar K, Babu NR, Prabhu KR. Design and Analysis of RBFN-Based Single MPPT Controller for Hybrid Solar and Wind Energy System. IEEE Access. 2017;5:15308-17. [3]. Singh B, Jain C, Goel S, Gogia R, Subramaniam U. A Sustainable Solar Photovoltaic Energy System Interfaced with Grid-Tied Voltage Source Converter for Power Quality Improvement. Electric Power Components and Systems. 2016 Dec 9:1-3. [4]. Jain C, Singh B. A Three-Phase Grid Tied SPV System With Adaptive DC Link Voltage for CPI Voltage Variations. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy. 2016 Jan;7(1):337-44. [5]. Messalti S, Harrag A, Loukriz A. A new variable step size neural networks MPPT controller: Review, simulation and hardware implementation. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2017 Feb 28;68:221-33. [6]. Saravanan S, Babu NR. RBFN based MPPT algorithm for PV system with high step up converter. Energy Conversion and Management. 2016 Aug 15;122:239-51. [7]. Xiao W, Edwin FF, Spagnuolo G, Jatskevich J. Efficient approaches for modeling and simulating photovoltaic power systems. IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics. 2013 Jan;3(1):500-8. [8]. El Khateb A, Rahim NA, Selvaraj J, Uddin MN. Fuzzy-logic-controller-based SEPIC converter for maximum power point tracking. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications. 2014 Jul;50(4):2349-58. [9]. Damodhar Reddy, Sudha Ramasamy “A fuzzy logic MPPT controller based three phase grid-tied solar PV system with improved CPI voltage” International Conference on Innovations in Power and Advanced Computing Technologies [i-PACT], April 2017 IEEE (pp. 1-6). IEEE. [10]. Singh B, Shahani DT, Verma AK. Neural network controlled grid interfaced solar photovoltaic power generation. IET Power Electronics. 2014 Mar;7(3):614-26. [11]. Damodhar Reddy, Sudha Ramasamy, “Design of RBFN Controller Based Boost Type Vienna Rectifier for Grid-Tied Wind Energy Conversion System” DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2787567, IEEE Access. [12]. Lyden S, Haque ME. A simulated annealing global maximum power point tracking approach for PV modules under partial shading conditions. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics. 2016 Jun;31(6):4171-81. [13]. Gil-Antonio L, Saldivar-Marquez MB, Portillo-Rodriguez O. Maximum power point tracking techniques in photovoltaic systems: A brief review. InPower Electronics (CIEP), 2016 13th International Conference on 2016 Jun 20 (pp. 317-322). IEEE. [14]. Lin WM, Hong CM, Ou TC, Chiu TM. Hybrid intelligent control of PMSG wind generation system using pitch angle control with RBFN. Energy conversion and management. 2011 Feb 28;52(2):1244-51. [15]. Ramasamy S. Single Stage Energy Conversion through an RBFN Controller based Boost Type Vienna Rectifier in the Wind Turbine System. Gazi University Journal of Science.;30(4):253-66. [16]. Gules R, Dos Santos WM, Dos Reis FA, Romaneli EF, Badin AA. A modified SEPIC converter with high static gain for renewable applications. IEEE transactions on power electronics. 2014 Nov;29(11):5860-71. [17]. Chen YM, Huang AQ, Yu X. A high step-up three-port dc–dc converter for stand-alone PV/battery power systems. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics. 2013 Nov;28(11):5049-62. [18]. Debnath D, Chatterjee K. Two-stage solar photovoltaic-based stand-alone scheme having battery as energy storage element for rural deployment. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics. 2015 Jul;62(7):4148-57. [19]. Choi WY, Lee SJ. Three-Level SEPIC with Improved Efficiency and Balanced Capacitor Voltages. Journal of Power Electronics. 2016 Mar 1;16(2):447-54. [20]. Yang MK, Lee SJ, Heo J, Choi WY. High-efficiency three-level SEPIC for grid-tied PV systems. InEnergy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE), 2016 IEEE 2016 Sep 18 (pp. 1-5). IEEE. [21]. Choi WY. Three-level single-ended primary-inductor converter for photovoltaic power conditioning systems. Solar Energy. 2016 Feb 29;125:43-50. [22]. Mohanraj K, Bharathnarayanan S. Three Level SEPIC For Hybrid Wind-Solar Energy Systems. Energy Procedia. 2017 Jun 30;117:120-7.
Year 2019, Volume: 32 Issue: 3, 853 - 869, 01.09.2019
https://doi.org/10.35378/gujs.375313

Abstract

References

  • [1]. Joshi KA, Pindoriya NM. Impact investigation of rooftop Solar PV system: A case study in India. In2012 3rd IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Europe (ISGT Europe) 2012 Oct 14 (pp. 1-8). IEEE. [2]. Kumar K, Babu NR, Prabhu KR. Design and Analysis of RBFN-Based Single MPPT Controller for Hybrid Solar and Wind Energy System. IEEE Access. 2017;5:15308-17. [3]. Singh B, Jain C, Goel S, Gogia R, Subramaniam U. A Sustainable Solar Photovoltaic Energy System Interfaced with Grid-Tied Voltage Source Converter for Power Quality Improvement. Electric Power Components and Systems. 2016 Dec 9:1-3. [4]. Jain C, Singh B. A Three-Phase Grid Tied SPV System With Adaptive DC Link Voltage for CPI Voltage Variations. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy. 2016 Jan;7(1):337-44. [5]. Messalti S, Harrag A, Loukriz A. A new variable step size neural networks MPPT controller: Review, simulation and hardware implementation. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2017 Feb 28;68:221-33. [6]. Saravanan S, Babu NR. RBFN based MPPT algorithm for PV system with high step up converter. Energy Conversion and Management. 2016 Aug 15;122:239-51. [7]. Xiao W, Edwin FF, Spagnuolo G, Jatskevich J. Efficient approaches for modeling and simulating photovoltaic power systems. IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics. 2013 Jan;3(1):500-8. [8]. El Khateb A, Rahim NA, Selvaraj J, Uddin MN. Fuzzy-logic-controller-based SEPIC converter for maximum power point tracking. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications. 2014 Jul;50(4):2349-58. [9]. Damodhar Reddy, Sudha Ramasamy “A fuzzy logic MPPT controller based three phase grid-tied solar PV system with improved CPI voltage” International Conference on Innovations in Power and Advanced Computing Technologies [i-PACT], April 2017 IEEE (pp. 1-6). IEEE. [10]. Singh B, Shahani DT, Verma AK. Neural network controlled grid interfaced solar photovoltaic power generation. IET Power Electronics. 2014 Mar;7(3):614-26. [11]. Damodhar Reddy, Sudha Ramasamy, “Design of RBFN Controller Based Boost Type Vienna Rectifier for Grid-Tied Wind Energy Conversion System” DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2787567, IEEE Access. [12]. Lyden S, Haque ME. A simulated annealing global maximum power point tracking approach for PV modules under partial shading conditions. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics. 2016 Jun;31(6):4171-81. [13]. Gil-Antonio L, Saldivar-Marquez MB, Portillo-Rodriguez O. Maximum power point tracking techniques in photovoltaic systems: A brief review. InPower Electronics (CIEP), 2016 13th International Conference on 2016 Jun 20 (pp. 317-322). IEEE. [14]. Lin WM, Hong CM, Ou TC, Chiu TM. Hybrid intelligent control of PMSG wind generation system using pitch angle control with RBFN. Energy conversion and management. 2011 Feb 28;52(2):1244-51. [15]. Ramasamy S. Single Stage Energy Conversion through an RBFN Controller based Boost Type Vienna Rectifier in the Wind Turbine System. Gazi University Journal of Science.;30(4):253-66. [16]. Gules R, Dos Santos WM, Dos Reis FA, Romaneli EF, Badin AA. A modified SEPIC converter with high static gain for renewable applications. IEEE transactions on power electronics. 2014 Nov;29(11):5860-71. [17]. Chen YM, Huang AQ, Yu X. A high step-up three-port dc–dc converter for stand-alone PV/battery power systems. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics. 2013 Nov;28(11):5049-62. [18]. Debnath D, Chatterjee K. Two-stage solar photovoltaic-based stand-alone scheme having battery as energy storage element for rural deployment. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics. 2015 Jul;62(7):4148-57. [19]. Choi WY, Lee SJ. Three-Level SEPIC with Improved Efficiency and Balanced Capacitor Voltages. Journal of Power Electronics. 2016 Mar 1;16(2):447-54. [20]. Yang MK, Lee SJ, Heo J, Choi WY. High-efficiency three-level SEPIC for grid-tied PV systems. InEnergy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE), 2016 IEEE 2016 Sep 18 (pp. 1-5). IEEE. [21]. Choi WY. Three-level single-ended primary-inductor converter for photovoltaic power conditioning systems. Solar Energy. 2016 Feb 29;125:43-50. [22]. Mohanraj K, Bharathnarayanan S. Three Level SEPIC For Hybrid Wind-Solar Energy Systems. Energy Procedia. 2017 Jun 30;117:120-7.
There are 1 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Engineering
Journal Section Electrical & Electronics Engineering
Authors

Sudha Ramasamy

Damodhar Reddy

Publication Date September 1, 2019
Published in Issue Year 2019 Volume: 32 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Ramasamy, S., & Reddy, D. (2019). Comparative Analysis of P & O and RBFN MPPT Controller Based Three Level SEPIC Topology for 1.2kW Solar PV System. Gazi University Journal of Science, 32(3), 853-869. https://doi.org/10.35378/gujs.375313
AMA Ramasamy S, Reddy D. Comparative Analysis of P & O and RBFN MPPT Controller Based Three Level SEPIC Topology for 1.2kW Solar PV System. Gazi University Journal of Science. September 2019;32(3):853-869. doi:10.35378/gujs.375313
Chicago Ramasamy, Sudha, and Damodhar Reddy. “Comparative Analysis of P & O and RBFN MPPT Controller Based Three Level SEPIC Topology for 1.2kW Solar PV System”. Gazi University Journal of Science 32, no. 3 (September 2019): 853-69. https://doi.org/10.35378/gujs.375313.
EndNote Ramasamy S, Reddy D (September 1, 2019) Comparative Analysis of P & O and RBFN MPPT Controller Based Three Level SEPIC Topology for 1.2kW Solar PV System. Gazi University Journal of Science 32 3 853–869.
IEEE S. Ramasamy and D. Reddy, “Comparative Analysis of P & O and RBFN MPPT Controller Based Three Level SEPIC Topology for 1.2kW Solar PV System”, Gazi University Journal of Science, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 853–869, 2019, doi: 10.35378/gujs.375313.
ISNAD Ramasamy, Sudha - Reddy, Damodhar. “Comparative Analysis of P & O and RBFN MPPT Controller Based Three Level SEPIC Topology for 1.2kW Solar PV System”. Gazi University Journal of Science 32/3 (September 2019), 853-869. https://doi.org/10.35378/gujs.375313.
JAMA Ramasamy S, Reddy D. Comparative Analysis of P & O and RBFN MPPT Controller Based Three Level SEPIC Topology for 1.2kW Solar PV System. Gazi University Journal of Science. 2019;32:853–869.
MLA Ramasamy, Sudha and Damodhar Reddy. “Comparative Analysis of P & O and RBFN MPPT Controller Based Three Level SEPIC Topology for 1.2kW Solar PV System”. Gazi University Journal of Science, vol. 32, no. 3, 2019, pp. 853-69, doi:10.35378/gujs.375313.
Vancouver Ramasamy S, Reddy D. Comparative Analysis of P & O and RBFN MPPT Controller Based Three Level SEPIC Topology for 1.2kW Solar PV System. Gazi University Journal of Science. 2019;32(3):853-69.