Öz
ABSTRACT
In survey researches a distinction between two major types of missing data in surveys due to nonresponse had been made. First type is, unit nonresponse; for some sample units no entire data is available. The second type is, item nonresponse; sample unit or units have missing data for one or more questions or variables (1, 2, 3). In this study, item nonresponse and its sources, reasons and what it caused was tried to be investigated. It has seen that, on nonresponse question structure, question content and respondent factors have important effects.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Key Words: Item nonresponse Questionnaire effects Respondent effects
Kaynakça
- Sherman, R. P., “Test of certain types of ignorable nonresponse in surveys subject to item nonresponse or attrition”, American Journal Of Political Science, 44(2): 362-377 (2001).
- Leigh, J. H. and Martin, C. R., ““Don’t know” Item nonresponse in a telephone survey: effects of question form and respondent charecteristics”, Journal Of Marketing Research, 14: 418-24 (November 1987).
- Darwin, C., “Determinants of item nonresponse”, Survey Research Techniques Seminar, http://www.personal.psu.edu/faculty/d/r/drj10/Cruz.pdf (22.03.2003).
- Groves, R. M., Survey errors and survey costs, John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, 133-236 (1989).
- Rubin, D. B., Multiple ımputation for nonresponse in surveys, John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, 1-30 (1987).
- Item Nonresponse, NLSY79 User’s Guide, http://www.bls.gov/nls/79guide/1999/nls79g5.pdf (or http://www.bls.gov/nls/nlsy79.htm) (25.04.2003)
- Schuman, H., Presser, S., Questions and answers in attitude surveys: Experiments on question form, wording and context, Academic Press, New York, 120-185 (1995).
- Churchill, G.A., Marketing research, Dryden Press, Florida, 178-220 (1996)
- Tourangeau, R., Smith, T., “Asking sensitive questions: The impact of data collection mode, question format, and question context”, The Public Opinion Quarterly, 60(2): 275-304 (1996).
- Çıngı, H., “Araştırma yöntemleri”, H.Ü. Fen Fakültesi İstatisdtik Bölümü Ders Notları, Ankara, 16-23 (1994).
- Murata, T. and Gwartney, P.A., 1999, “Question salience, question difficulty and item nonresponse in survey research”, http://www.jpsm.umd.edu/icsn/papers/ MurataGwartney1.htm (18.08.2002).
- Balcı, A., Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma, Pegem Yayınevi, Ankara, Türkiye, 185-188 (2001).
- Baş, T., Anket, Seçkin Yayıncılık, Ankara, Türkiye, 60-61, (2001)
- Lehmann, D.R., Gupta, S. and Steckel J. H., Marketing research, Addision-Wesley Inc., United States 183-185 (1998).
- Stennet B., “Opinion survey rating scales”, http://www.assessmentplus.com/articles/ opinion_survey_rating_scales.pdf. (03.04.2003).
- Coombs, C. and Coombs, L., “‘Don't know’: item ambiguity or respondent uncertainity?”, The Public Opinion Quarterly, 40(4): 497-514 (1976).
- Sekaran, U., Research methods for business: a skill-building approach, John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, 176- 222 (1999).
- Gökçe, B., Toplumsal bilimlerde araştırma, Savaş Yayınevi, Ankara, Türkiye, 114-115 (1999).
- Koç, İ., “Soru kağıdı hazırlama ve soru sorma teknikleri ders programı”, D.İ.E. Anketör Eğitim Merkezi Temel Eğitim Programı, 22-23, Ankara, Türkiye (2002).
- Herzog A. and Dielman L., “Age differences in nonresponse accuracy for factual survey question”, Journal Of Gerontology, 40(3): 350-357 (1985).
- Faulkenberry, G. and Mason, R. “Characteristics of non opinion response groups.”, The Public Opinion Quarterly, 42(4): 533-543 (1978).
Öz
Anket araştırmalarında yanıtlamamadan dolayı oluşan kayıp verinin iki temel tür ayırımı yapılmıştır. Birinci türü, birim yanıtlamamadır; örneği oluşturan bazı birimlere ilişkin hiçbir veri yoktur. İkinci türü ise, soru yanıtlamamadır; örneği oluşturan birim veya birimlere ilişkin bir veya birden fazla soru veya değişken verisi yoktur (1, 2, 3). Bu çalışmada, soru yanıtlamama kaynakları, nedenleri, nelere yol açtığı incelenmeye çalışılmıştır. Soru yapısı, soru içeriği ve yanıtlayıcı faktörlerinin yanıtlamama üzerindeki önemli etkileri olduğu görülmüştür
Anahtar Kelimeler
Soru yanıtlamama Anket formunun etkileri Yanıtlayıcı etkileri
Kaynakça
- Sherman, R. P., “Test of certain types of ignorable nonresponse in surveys subject to item nonresponse or attrition”, American Journal Of Political Science, 44(2): 362-377 (2001).
- Leigh, J. H. and Martin, C. R., ““Don’t know” Item nonresponse in a telephone survey: effects of question form and respondent charecteristics”, Journal Of Marketing Research, 14: 418-24 (November 1987).
- Darwin, C., “Determinants of item nonresponse”, Survey Research Techniques Seminar, http://www.personal.psu.edu/faculty/d/r/drj10/Cruz.pdf (22.03.2003).
- Groves, R. M., Survey errors and survey costs, John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, 133-236 (1989).
- Rubin, D. B., Multiple ımputation for nonresponse in surveys, John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, 1-30 (1987).
- Item Nonresponse, NLSY79 User’s Guide, http://www.bls.gov/nls/79guide/1999/nls79g5.pdf (or http://www.bls.gov/nls/nlsy79.htm) (25.04.2003)
- Schuman, H., Presser, S., Questions and answers in attitude surveys: Experiments on question form, wording and context, Academic Press, New York, 120-185 (1995).
- Churchill, G.A., Marketing research, Dryden Press, Florida, 178-220 (1996)
- Tourangeau, R., Smith, T., “Asking sensitive questions: The impact of data collection mode, question format, and question context”, The Public Opinion Quarterly, 60(2): 275-304 (1996).
- Çıngı, H., “Araştırma yöntemleri”, H.Ü. Fen Fakültesi İstatisdtik Bölümü Ders Notları, Ankara, 16-23 (1994).
- Murata, T. and Gwartney, P.A., 1999, “Question salience, question difficulty and item nonresponse in survey research”, http://www.jpsm.umd.edu/icsn/papers/ MurataGwartney1.htm (18.08.2002).
- Balcı, A., Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma, Pegem Yayınevi, Ankara, Türkiye, 185-188 (2001).
- Baş, T., Anket, Seçkin Yayıncılık, Ankara, Türkiye, 60-61, (2001)
- Lehmann, D.R., Gupta, S. and Steckel J. H., Marketing research, Addision-Wesley Inc., United States 183-185 (1998).
- Stennet B., “Opinion survey rating scales”, http://www.assessmentplus.com/articles/ opinion_survey_rating_scales.pdf. (03.04.2003).
- Coombs, C. and Coombs, L., “‘Don't know’: item ambiguity or respondent uncertainity?”, The Public Opinion Quarterly, 40(4): 497-514 (1976).
- Sekaran, U., Research methods for business: a skill-building approach, John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, 176- 222 (1999).
- Gökçe, B., Toplumsal bilimlerde araştırma, Savaş Yayınevi, Ankara, Türkiye, 114-115 (1999).
- Koç, İ., “Soru kağıdı hazırlama ve soru sorma teknikleri ders programı”, D.İ.E. Anketör Eğitim Merkezi Temel Eğitim Programı, 22-23, Ankara, Türkiye (2002).
- Herzog A. and Dielman L., “Age differences in nonresponse accuracy for factual survey question”, Journal Of Gerontology, 40(3): 350-357 (1985).
- Faulkenberry, G. and Mason, R. “Characteristics of non opinion response groups.”, The Public Opinion Quarterly, 42(4): 533-543 (1978).
Ayrıntılar
| Birincil Dil | İngilizce |
|---|---|
| Bölüm | Statistics |
| Yazarlar | |
| Yayımlanma Tarihi | 11 Ağustos 2010 |
| Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2005 Cilt: 18 Sayı: 4 |