Modelling and Validation of The Production Parameters of Unalloyed Aluminium Sheets

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1, 94 - 108, 29.03.2021

Dıckson Davıd Olodu

Öz

Modelling of process parameters and its validation in Aluninium production industries poses great challenges in the production of Aluminium sheets in Aluminium Manufacturing companies. This research therefore focused on the modelling and validation of production parameters of unalloyed Aluminium sheets in Aluminium manufacturing industries. The process parameters investigated were temperature (T), pressure (P) and percentage by volume of Aluminium (Ap) used. The effects of these process parameters on the mechanical properties of the developed unalloyed Aluminium sheets were modelled to ease Aluminium manufacturing processes in Aluminium industries. From the plots obtained, it was observed that the optimal tensile strength, young modulus of elasticity, shear modulus and Brinell hardness number were 621MPa, 69GPa, 25.5GPa, and 61 at temperature of 1921°C, 1610°C, 1442°C and 1800°C respectively. In comparison with pressure, the obtained values for optimal tensile strength, young modulus of elasticity, shear modulus and Brinell Hardness Number were 562MPa, 68GPa, 26.2GPa and 61 at pressure of 72GPa, 69.5GPa, 69.5GPa and 69.5GPa respectively. Moreover, empirical Models were also developed for predicting the mechanical properties such as tensile strength, young modulus of elasticity, shear modulus and hardness for the produced unalloyed Aluminium sheets. The models were validated using coefficient of determination (R2) and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE). The coefficient of determination (R2) obtained ranges from 0.9213 (92.13%) to 0.9911 (99.11%) which indicates that a substantial good fit was achieved by the regression models developed. The mean absolute percentage error of the developed models also ranges from 0.46% to 3.38% which was below 10% recommended. The values obtained from the validation of these models were therefore found to be satisfactory, and shows good predictability of the model and its adequacy. Finally, the results obtained show that temperature and pressure had great effects on the mechanical properties of the produced unalloyed Aluminium sheets.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Mechanical Properties, Modelling, Process Parameters, Unalloyed Aluminium, Validation of Model

Kaynakça

• Crowe, C. R, Gray, R. A, & Hasson, D. F. (1985). Microstructure Controlled Fracture Toughness of SiC/Al Metal Matrix Composites. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Composite Materials, 843-66.
• Friend, C. M. (1987). The Effect of Matrix Properties on Reinforcement is Short Al2O3 Fiber-Al MMCs. Journal of Materials Science, 22(8), 3005-3010.
• Idicula, M., Joseph, K., & Thomas, S. (2009). Mechanical Performance of Short Banana/Sisal Hybrid Fibre Polyester Composite. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 29(1), 12-29.
• Joardar, H., Sutradhar, G., & Das, N. S. (2012). FEM Simulation and Experimental Validation of Cold Forging Behavior of LM6 Base Metal Matrix Composites. Journal of Minerals and Materials Characterization and Engineering, 11(10), 989-994.
• Kok, M. (2005). Production and Mechanical Properties of Al2O3 Particle-Reinforced 2024 Aluminium Alloy Composites. Materials Processing Technology Journal, 161(3), 381-387.
• Kumar, A., Lal, S., & Kumar, S. (2013). Fabrication and Characterization of A359/Al2O3 Metal Matrix Composite using Electromagnetic Stir Casting Method. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 2(3), 250-254.
• Liping, G., & Deku, M. S. (1992). Production of Sawdust-Plastic Composite Using Compression Moulding. International Journal of Material Science, 2, 87-92.
• Nieh, T. G., & Chellman, D. J. (1984). Modulus Measurements in Discontinuous Reinforced Aluminum Composites. Scripta Metallurgica, 18, 925-938.
• Nieh, T. G., Raninen, R. A, & Chellman, D. J. (1985). Microstructure and Fracture in SiC Whisker Reinforced 2124 Aluminum Composite. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Composite Materials. Metallurgical Society, Inc., 825-842.
• Olodu, D. D & Osarenmwinda, J. O. (2018). Emperical Modelling of Injection Moulded High Density Polyethylene-Grass Composite. American Journal of Engineering Research (AJER), 7(12), 245-250.
• Orbulov, I. N, Ginsztler, J. (2012). Compressive Behaviour of Metal Matrix Syntactic Foams. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 9(2), 43-56.
• Osarenmwinda, J. O, Nwachukwu, J. C. (2010). Development of Composite Material from Agricultural Waste. International Journal of Engineering Research in Africa, 3, 42-48.
• Prabu, S. B., Karunamoorthy, L., Kathiresan, S., & Mohan, B. (2006). Influence of Stirring Speed and Stirring Time on Distribution of Particles in Cast Metal Matrix Composite. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 171(2), 268-73.
• Romanova, V. A., Balokhonov, R. R., & Schmauder, S. (2009). The Influence of the Reinforcing Particle Shape and Interface Strength on the Fracture Behavior of a Metal Matrix Composite. Acta Materialia, 57(1), 97-107.
• Rozovsky, E., Hahn, W. C., & Avitzur, B. (1973). The Behavior of Particles During Plastic Deformation of Metals. Metallurgical Transactions, 4(4), 927-30.
• Saravanan, C., Subramanian, K., Ananda Krishnan, V., & Sankara Narayanan, R. (2015). Effect of Particulate Reinforced Aluminium Metal Matrix Composite. Mechanics and Mechanical Engineering, 19(1), 23-30.
• Venkatesh, B., & Harish, B. (2015). Mechanical Properties of Metal Matrix Composites (Al/SiCp) Particles Produced by Powder Metallurgy. International Journal of Engineering Research and General Science. 3(1), 1277-1284.
• Yao, B., Hofmeister, C., Patterson, T., Sohn, Y., van den Bergh, M., Delahanty, T., & Cho, K. (2010). Microstructural Features Influencing the Strength of Trimodal Aluminum Metal-matrix-Composites. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 41(8), 933-941.