Systematic Reviews and Meta Analysis

Graduate Student Well-Being: A Systematic Review

Volume: 5 Number: 2 December 31, 2024
EN

Graduate Student Well-Being: A Systematic Review

Abstract

Recent studies indicate that graduate students experience higher levels of stress, anxiety, depression, and physical health issues, resulting in the lowest levels of well-being compared to other groups in higher education settings. The COVID-19 pandemic has further exacerbated these negative experiences. This study aims to evaluate recent research on well-being of graduate students through a systematic review. The study was conducted by searching article abstracts in databases: JSTOR, Science Direct, ERIC, DergiPark, and TR Dizin using both Turkish and English keywords. A total of 781 publications were reviewed, and 12 studies were included in the detailed analysis based on predefined eligibility criteria. The review results show that the concept of well-being has been approached from different theoretical perspectives and research methods. Key findings indicate that graduate students face unique stressors, such as work-life imbalance, high academic pressures, faculty-student relationships, socialization within academic communities, and often limited social support, all of which contribute to lower well-being. Based on the results, several recommendations for supporting graduate students' well-being in both their academic and personal lives are proposed.

Keywords

Ethical Statement

This is a systematic review study; therefore no need of an ethics committee approval.

References

  1. Ali, A., & Kohun, F. (2006). Dealing with isolation feelings in IS doctoral programs. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 1(1), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.28945/58
  2. Austin, A. E., & McDaniels, M. (2006). Preparing the professoriate of the future: Graduate student socialization for faculty roles. In: Smart, J. C. (eds) Higher education: Handbook of theory and research, vol 21. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4512-3_8
  3. Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28, 117–148.
  4. Barreira, P., Basilico, M., & Bolotnyy, V. (2018). Graduate student mental health: Lessons from American economics departments. Harvard University, https://scholar.harvard.edu/bolotnyy/publications/graduate-student-mental-health-lessons-american- economics-departments
  5. Bautista, T. G., Roman, G., Khan, M., Lee, M., Sahbaz, S., Duthely, L. M., Knippenberg, A., Macias-Burgos, M. A., Davidson, A., Scaramutti, C., Gabrilove, J., Pusek, S., Mehta, D., & Bredella, M. A. (2023). What is well-being? A scoping review of the conceptual and operational definitions of occupational well-being. Journal of Clinical and Translational Science 7(727), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2023.648
  6. Brown, L., & Watson, P. (2010). Understanding the experiences of female doctoral students. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 34, 385–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2010.484056
  7. Burt, B. A., McCallum, C. M., Wallace, J. D., Roberson, J. J., Bonanno, A., & Doerman, E. (2021). Moving toward stronger advising practices: how black males’ experiences at HPWIs advance a more caring and wholeness-promoting framework for graduate advising. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 123(10), 31-58, https://doi.org/10.1177/01614681211059018
  8. Cassuto, L. (2013). Ph.D. attrition: How much is too much?. Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved May 13, 2024, from https://www.chronicle.com/article/ph-d-attrition-how-much-is-too-much/?cid= gen_sign_in.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Higher Education Studies (Other)

Journal Section

Systematic Reviews and Meta Analysis

Publication Date

December 31, 2024

Submission Date

November 3, 2024

Acceptance Date

December 27, 2024

Published in Issue

Year 2024 Volume: 5 Number: 2

APA
Gökten Bayrak, Ö. (2024). Graduate Student Well-Being: A Systematic Review. Higher Education Governance and Policy, 5(2), 147-161. https://doi.org/10.55993/hegp.1578666
AMA
1.Gökten Bayrak Ö. Graduate Student Well-Being: A Systematic Review. HEGP. 2024;5(2):147-161. doi:10.55993/hegp.1578666
Chicago
Gökten Bayrak, Özge. 2024. “Graduate Student Well-Being: A Systematic Review”. Higher Education Governance and Policy 5 (2): 147-61. https://doi.org/10.55993/hegp.1578666.
EndNote
Gökten Bayrak Ö (December 1, 2024) Graduate Student Well-Being: A Systematic Review. Higher Education Governance and Policy 5 2 147–161.
IEEE
[1]Ö. Gökten Bayrak, “Graduate Student Well-Being: A Systematic Review”, HEGP, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 147–161, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.55993/hegp.1578666.
ISNAD
Gökten Bayrak, Özge. “Graduate Student Well-Being: A Systematic Review”. Higher Education Governance and Policy 5/2 (December 1, 2024): 147-161. https://doi.org/10.55993/hegp.1578666.
JAMA
1.Gökten Bayrak Ö. Graduate Student Well-Being: A Systematic Review. HEGP. 2024;5:147–161.
MLA
Gökten Bayrak, Özge. “Graduate Student Well-Being: A Systematic Review”. Higher Education Governance and Policy, vol. 5, no. 2, Dec. 2024, pp. 147-61, doi:10.55993/hegp.1578666.
Vancouver
1.Özge Gökten Bayrak. Graduate Student Well-Being: A Systematic Review. HEGP. 2024 Dec. 1;5(2):147-61. doi:10.55993/hegp.1578666

Cited By