Comparative Analysis of Higher Education Accreditation Criteria of Turkish and German Accreditation Bodies

Furkan Şimşek; Gülşah Taşçı; Salih Şahin

doi:10.55993/hegp.1729205

Comparative Analysis of Higher Education Accreditation Criteria of Turkish and German Accreditation Bodies

Abstract

Accreditation in higher education is the process of assessing and assuring the quality of educational institutions and programmes. The importance of accreditation is increasing for Türkiye. Therefore, the main purpose of this study is to reveal the similarities and differences between the criteria developed by the internationally recognised accreditation body and the local accreditation body for quality management and their perspectives on quality management. In this context, this study was carried out using a comparative document analysis design from qualitative research methods in accordance with the nature of the research. Thematic analysis was used for data analysis. The scope of the research is limited to the Evaluation Criteria for Health Sciences Education Programmes dated June 2022 of the Association for Evaluation and Accreditation of Health Sciences Education Programmes and the Accreditation Agency in Health and Social Sciences' Accreditation Criteria for Health Education dated November 2023 and the comparative analysis of the criteria of these two organisations. As a result of the research, by comparing the accreditation criteria of the health sciences education programmes determined by the selected accreditation bodies for higher education, the similarities and differences of the higher education accreditation processes are mutually revealed and the main points that stand out as a result of the comparative analysis of higher education accreditation are discussed.

Keywords

Supporting Institution

No funding was received from any institution or organisation for this study.

Ethical Statement

The authors received approval from their institutions.

Thanks

---

References

Abou Neel, E. A., & Frick, W. C. (2024). Addressing challenges, approaches, and outcomes of university accreditation: Faculty and administrative insights from a college of dental medicine. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8(8), Article 5677. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i8.5677
Acevedo-De-los-Ríos, A., & Rondinel-Oviedo, D. R. (2021). Impact, added value and relevance of an accreditation process on quality assurance in architectural higher education. Quality in Higher Education, 28(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2021.1977482 AHPGS. (2023). Handbook for The Accreditation of Medical Education Programs. https://www.ahpgs.de/assets/WFME/Handbook_ESG_WFME_2023.pdf
Bakioğlu, A. (1996). Üniversitelerde kalite yönetimi ve özdeğerlendirme [Quality management and self-assessment in universities]. Marmara Üniversitesi Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 8(1), 49-65. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/maruaebd/issue/363/2028
Batdı, V., Aslan, A., & Elaldı, Ş. (2024). Meta-Tematik analiz örnek uygulamalar (2. Baskı). Anı Publishing.
Boelen, C., & Woollard, B. (2009). Social accountability and accreditation: A new frontier for educational institutions. Medical Education, 43(9), 887-894. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03413.x
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Braun, V., & Clarke V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications.
Bryson, J. M., Anderson, S. R., & Alston, F. K. (2011). Implementing and sustaining your strategic plan: A workbook for public and nonprofit organizations. John Wiley & Sons.

Carbone, F., Oosterbeek, L., Costa, C., & Ferreira, A. M. (2020). Extending and adapting the concept of quality management for museums and cultural heritage attractions: A comparative study of southern European cultural heritage managers' perceptions. Tourism Management Perspectives, 35, Article 100698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2020.100698
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2023). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of the crisis. MIT Press.
Duarte, N., & Vardasca, R. (2023). Literature review of accreditation systems in higher education. Education Sciences, 13(6), Article 582. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13060582
Duffy, G. L. (2014). Modular kazien: Continuous and breakthrough improvement. ASQ Quality Press.
Eaton, J. S. (2015). An overview of US accreditation. Council for Higher Education Accreditation.
ENQA. (2015). Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area (ESG). https://www.enqa.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/ESG_2015.pdf
Fitch, K. (2014). Professionalisation and public relations education: Industry accreditation of Australian university courses in the early 1990s. Public Relations Review, 40(4), 623-631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.02.015
Frank, J. R., Taber, S., van Zanten, M., Scheele, F., & Blouin, D. (2020). The role of accreditation in 21st century health professions education: Report of an International Consensus Group. BMC Medical Education, 20(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02121-5
Freeman, J., Simonsen, B., Briere, D. E., & MacSuga-Gage, A. S. (2014). Pre-service teacher training in classroom management: A review of state accreditation policy and teacher preparation programs. Teacher Education and Special Education, 37(2), 106-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406413507002
Gaston, P. L. (2023). Higher education accreditation: How it's changing, why it must. Routledge.
Golowko, N., Kopia, J., Geldmacher, W., & Förster-Pastor, U. S. (2017). Comparative study on quality management at German private universities. Quality-Access to Success, 18(157). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317358836
Greenfield, D., & Braithwaite, J. (2008). Health sector accreditation research: a systematic review. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 20(3), 172-183. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18339666/
Harvey, L. (2004). The power of accreditation: Views of academics. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 26(2), 207–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080042000218267 Harvey, L., & Green, D. (1993). Defining quality. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 18(1), 9-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293930180102
Harvey, L., & Knight, P. T. (1996). Transforming higher education. Open University Press.
Harvey, L., & Newton, J. (2004). Transforming quality evaluation: Moving on. In D. F. Westerheijden, B. Stensaker, & M. J. Rosa (Eds.), Quality assurance in higher education: Trends in regulation, translation and transformation (pp. 225–245). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6012-0_9
Huisman, J., & Westerheijden, D. F. (2010). Bologna and quality assurance: Progress made or pulling the wrong cart? Quality in Higher Education, 16(1), 63–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538321003679531 Imai, M. (1986). Kaizen: The key to Japan’s competitive success. McGraw-Hill Education.
Johnson, J. D. (2020). Administrative bloat in higher education. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Jongbloed, B., Vossensteyn, H., van Vught, F., & Westerheijden, D. F. (2018). Transparency in higher education: The emergence of a new perspective on higher education governance. In A. Curaj, L. Deca, & R. Pricopie (Eds.), European higher education area: The impact of past and future policies (pp. 441-455). Springer.
Kayyali, M. (2024). Quality assurance and accreditation in higher education: Issues, models, and best practices. Springer.
Kirk, J., & Miller, M. L. (1991). Reliability and validity in qualitative research (8th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Kondakçı, Y., Zayim Kurtay, M., & Çalışkan, O. (2019). Antecedents of continuous change in educational organizations. International Journal of Educational Management, 33(6), 1366-1380. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1225532
Kondakçı, Y., Zayim Kurtay, M., Kaya-Kaçıkçı, S., Şenay, H. H., & Kulakoğlu, B. (2021). 'Scaling' the academia: Perspectives of academics on the impact of their practices. Research Evaluation, 30(2), 370-381. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvab015
Kumar, P., Shukla, B., & Passey, D. (2020). Impact of accreditation on quality and excellence of higher education institutions. Revista Investigación Operacional, 41(2), 151-167. https://rev-inv-ope.pantheonsorbonne.fr/sites/default/files/inline-files/41220-01.pdf
Leung, L. (2015) Validity, reliability, and generalizability in qualitative research. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 4(3), 324-327. https://doi.org/10.4103/2249-4863.161306
Lim, D. (2018). Quality assurance in higher education: A study of developing countries. Routledge.
Maguire, M., & Delahunt, B. (2017). Doing a thematic analysis: A practical, step-by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars. All Ireland Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 8(3), 3351-3364. http://ojs.aishe.org/index.php/aishe-j/article/view/335
Makhoul, S. A. (2019). Higher education accreditation, quality assurance and their impact to teaching and learning enhancement. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, 35(4), 235-250. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEAS-08-2018-0092
MSTI. (2005). A framework for qualifications of the European Higher Education Area Bologna Working Group on qualifications frameworks. https://ehea.info/media.ehea.info/file/WG_Frameworks_qualification/71/0/050218_QF_EHEA_580710.pdf
MYK. (2015). Türkiye Yeterlilikler Çerçevesi. https://www.yokak.gov.tr/documents/enqa/TYC_teblig_Tr.pdf
Neuman, L. W. (2019). Social research methods, qualitative and quantitative approaches. Pearson.
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
Paradeise, C., Reale, E., Bleiklie, I. & Ferlie, E. (Eds.). (2009). University governance: Western comparative perspectives. Springer.
Parscale, S. (2023). Accreditation as quality management theory and assessing student learning outcomes in higher education. Peter A. Okebukola & Stamenka Uvalić-Trumbić (Eds.), Quality assurance in higher education across the World, (pp. 60-76). CHEA.
SABAK. (2022). Sağlık Bilimleri Eğitim Programları Değerlendirme Ölçütleri – R4. https://www.sabak.org.tr/images/Genel_De%C4%9Ferlendirme_%C3%96l%C3%A7%C3%BCtleri_-_R4_5_Haziran_2022.pdf
Sallis, E. (2002). Total Quality Management in Education (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Shaw, C. D. (2003). Evaluating accreditation. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 15(6), 455-456. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzg092
Srikanthan, G., & Dalrymple, J. F. (2002). Developing a Holistic Model for Quality in Higher Education. Quality in Higher Education, 8(3), 215–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/1353832022000031656
Stensaker, B. (2008). Outcomes of quality assurance: A discussion of knowledge, methodology and validity. Quality in Higher Education, 14(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538320802011532
Stensaker, B., Langfeldt, L., Harvey, L., Huisman, J., & Westerheijden, D. (2011). An in‐depth study on the impact of external quality assurance. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(4), 465–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930903432074
Sziegat, H. (2022). Transforming governance of German higher education institutions. Research in Educational Administration & Leadership, 7(3), 472-517. https://doi.org/10.30828/real.1164190
Taşçı, G., & Kenan, S. (2021). Yükseköğretimde uluslararasılaşma: Teoriden uygulamaya. Pegem.
THEQC. (2024). Higher Education Evaluation and Quality Assurance Status Report 2023. https://www.yokak.gov.tr/documents/StatusReports/StatusReport_2023.pdf
Toprak, E., & Şakar, A. N. (2020). Need for accreditation agencies as stakeholders in open and distance learning: Case of “Audak” in Turkish higher education system. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 21(Special Issue-IODL), 29-48. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.770904
Wang, Z., Hisatomi, T., Li, R., Sayama, K., Liu, G., Domen, K., Li, C. & Wang, L. (2021). Efficiency accreditation and testing protocols for particulate photocatalysts toward solar fuel production. Joule, 5(2), 344-359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2021.01.001
WFME. (2023). Agencies with recognition status. https://wfme.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/List-of-Agencies-with-Recognition-Status-and-applying-1.pdf
Yakoub-Agha, I., Chabannon, C., Bader, P., Basak, G. W., Bonig, H., Ciceri, F., Corbacioglu, S., Duarte, R.F., Einsele, H., Hudecek, M., Kersten. M.J., Köhl, U., Kuball, J., Mielke, S., Mohty, M., Murray, J., Nagler, A., Robinson S, Saccardi, R., Sanchez-Guijo, F., Snowden, J.A., Srour, M,, Styczynski, J., Urbano-Ispizua, A., Hayden, P.J., & Kröger, N. (2020). Management of adults and children undergoing chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy: Best practice recommendations of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) and the Joint Accreditation Committee of ISCT and EBMT (JACIE). Haematologica, 105(2), 297-316. https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2019.229781
Yıldırım, K., & Yenipınar, Ş. (2022). Uluslararası kalite standartlarına uyum: Türk yükseköğretim kurumlarının yönetimsel boyutlar açısından değerlendirilmesi [Compliance with international quality standards: Evaluation of Turkish Higher Education Institutions in terms of management dimensions]. Eğitim ve Bilim, 47(211), 223–247. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2022.10640
YÖKAK. (2020). 2019 Yılı Akreditasyon Kuruluşları Genel Değerlendirme Raporu. https://www.yokak.gov.tr/documents/diger/2019GenelDegerlendirme.pdf
YÖKAK. (2021). Faaliyet Raporu. https://www.sabak.org.tr/images/SABAK_2021_Faaliyet_Raporu.pdf
YÖKAK. (2025). Tanınan Uluslararası Akreditasyon Kuruluşları. https://www.yokak.gov.tr/taninan-uluslararasi-akreditasyon-kuruluslari/
Yükseköğretim. (1981). Yükseköğretim Kanunu [Higher Education Act] (Decision No: 1981/17506). http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Quality Assurance in Higher Education

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Furkan Şimşek ^*
0000-0003-2028-8139
Türkiye

Gülşah Taşçı
0000-0003-0701-2824
Türkiye

Salih Şahin
0009-0004-7661-5260
Türkiye

Publication Date

December 31, 2025

Submission Date

July 12, 2025

Acceptance Date

November 10, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 6 Number: 2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.55993/hegp.1729205

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA69PT78ZB

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Şimşek, F., Taşçı, G., & Şahin, S. (2025). Comparative Analysis of Higher Education Accreditation Criteria of Turkish and German Accreditation Bodies. Higher Education Governance and Policy, 6(2), 101-119. https://doi.org/10.55993/hegp.1729205

AMA

1.Şimşek F, Taşçı G, Şahin S. Comparative Analysis of Higher Education Accreditation Criteria of Turkish and German Accreditation Bodies. HEGP. 2025;6(2):101-119. doi:10.55993/hegp.1729205

Chicago

Şimşek, Furkan, Gülşah Taşçı, and Salih Şahin. 2025. “Comparative Analysis of Higher Education Accreditation Criteria of Turkish and German Accreditation Bodies”. Higher Education Governance and Policy 6 (2): 101-19. https://doi.org/10.55993/hegp.1729205.

EndNote

Şimşek F, Taşçı G, Şahin S (December 1, 2025) Comparative Analysis of Higher Education Accreditation Criteria of Turkish and German Accreditation Bodies. Higher Education Governance and Policy 6 2 101–119.

IEEE

[1]F. Şimşek, G. Taşçı, and S. Şahin, “Comparative Analysis of Higher Education Accreditation Criteria of Turkish and German Accreditation Bodies”, HEGP, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 101–119, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.55993/hegp.1729205.

ISNAD

Şimşek, Furkan - Taşçı, Gülşah - Şahin, Salih. “Comparative Analysis of Higher Education Accreditation Criteria of Turkish and German Accreditation Bodies”. Higher Education Governance and Policy 6/2 (December 1, 2025): 101-119. https://doi.org/10.55993/hegp.1729205.

JAMA

1.Şimşek F, Taşçı G, Şahin S. Comparative Analysis of Higher Education Accreditation Criteria of Turkish and German Accreditation Bodies. HEGP. 2025;6:101–119.

MLA

Şimşek, Furkan, et al. “Comparative Analysis of Higher Education Accreditation Criteria of Turkish and German Accreditation Bodies”. Higher Education Governance and Policy, vol. 6, no. 2, Dec. 2025, pp. 101-19, doi:10.55993/hegp.1729205.

Vancouver

1.Furkan Şimşek, Gülşah Taşçı, Salih Şahin. Comparative Analysis of Higher Education Accreditation Criteria of Turkish and German Accreditation Bodies. HEGP. 2025 Dec. 1;6(2):101-19. doi:10.55993/hegp.1729205

Cited By

From cultural competence to structural competency: an anthropological reorientation of social work education and practice

Social Work Education

https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2026.2645060