Between the Global and the Local: The Study of the Academic Profession from a Latin American Perspective

Year 2020, Volume: 1 Issue: 1, 63 - 75, 30.06.2020

Monica Marquina

Abstract

The academic profession represents a subject within the realm of higher education that has experienced an outstanding development throughout the world. In Latin America, the interest in studying this field arises in a context of widespread reforms of the higher education system during the 1990s. The presence of research groups from this region, working within a global framework and in close collaboration with research centres from developed countries, can attest to this interest. This work attempts to establish a balance after three decades of unrelenting study of the academic profession to discover local specificities within global trends. It can be asserted that the tension between the global and the local is manifest both in the conceptualization of the subject matter and in the way this fledgling field has been developing in the region. There is a pending challenge, however, in ultimately establishing the case for the Latin American academic profession within the study of this activity at a global scale: not as a previous stage of a predefined global process, but rather as the outcome of the interaction between the global and the local. This is crucial for the construction of a type of knowledge that encompasses the diversity of the academic profession in the world as a constitutive property of its very conceptualization.

Keywords

Academic profession, Latin America, higher education reforms, comparative higher education

Supporting Institution

National Agency for Scientific and Technological Promotion (ANPCyT) Argentina

Project Number

PICT 2017–2110

Thanks

The author extends her gratitude to the research staff at APIKS Argentina and APIKS International, who have been lead players in the process studied herein and of which she is part of.

References

• Aboites Aguilar, H. (1999). La cultura de la evaluación en México y la evaluación de los académicos [The culture of evaluation in Mexico and academics’ evaluations]. In M. Rueda & M. Landesmann (Eds.), ¿Hacia una nueva cultura de la evaluación de los académicos? [Toward a new culture of evaluations among university teachers?]. Tercera Época: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México–CESU.
• Altbach, P. (2000). The changing academic workplace: Comparative perspectives. Boston, MA: Center for International Higher Education, Lynch School of Education, Boston College.
• Altbach, P. (2004). Centros y periferias en la profesión académica: los retos particulares que enfrentan los países en desarrollo [Centers and peripheries in the academic profession: special challenges in developing countries]. In P. Altbach (Ed.), El ocaso del gurú. La profesión académica en el tercer mundo [The dusk of the guru: The academic profession in the third world] (pp. 15-41). Mexico City: Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana.
• Altbach, P., & Finkelstein, M. (1997). The academic profession: The professoriate in crisis. New York, NY: Garland Publishing Inc.
• Altbach, P., Reisberg, L., Yudkevich, M., Androushchak, G., & Pacheco, I. F. (Eds.). (2012). Paying the professoriate: A global comparison of compensation and contracts. London: Routledge.
• Araujo, S. (2003). Universidad, investigación e incentivos. La cara oscura [University, research, and incentives: The dark side]. La Plata: Ediciones Al Margen.
• Arnove, R., & Torres, C. A. (1999). Comparative education: The dialectic of the global and the local. Maryland, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
• Balbachevsky, E. (2019). Brazil: An emerging academic market in transition. In M. J. Finkelstein & G. A. Jones (Eds.), Professorial pathways: Academic careers in a global perspective (pp. 119-144). Baltimore, MA: Johns Hopkins University Press.
• Becher, T., & Trowler, P. (2001). Tribus y territorios académicos. La indagación intelectual y las culturas de las disciplinas [Academic tribes and territories: intellectual enquiry and the culture of the disciplines]. Barcelona: Gedisa.
• Bernasconi, A. (2008). La profesionalización de la academia en Chile [Professionalization of academia in Chile]. Calidad en la Educación, 2008(28), 15-27.
• Bernasconi, A. (2010). La apoteosis del investigador y la institucionalización de la profesión académica en Chile [The researcher’s apotheosis and the institutionalization of the academic profession in Chile]. Estudios sobre Educación, 19, 139-163.
• Bourdieu, P. (1975). The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason. Social Science Information, 14(6), 19-47.
• Bourdieu, P. (1983). Campo de poder y campo intelectual [Power field and intellectual field]. Buenos Aires: Folios.
• Bourdieu, P. (2008). Homo academicus. Buenos Aires: Ed. Siglo XXI.
• Boyer, E., Altbach, P., & Whitelaw, M. J. (1994). The academic profession: An international perspective (A Special Report). Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
• Brunner, J. J. (1990). Universidad y sociedad en América Latina (Colección Ensayos, No. 17) [University and society in Latin America]. México: Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Unidad Azcapotzalco.
• Brunner, J. J. (2007). Educación Superior en Iberoamérica (Informe 2007) [Higher education in Latin America (2007 Report)]. Santiago: Universia–CINDA.
• Brunner, J. J., & Flisfisch, Á. (1989). La profesionalización académica tardía [The belated academic professionalization]. In Los intelectuales y las instituciones de la cultura [Intellectuals and culture institutions] (Vol. I, Chap. X, pp. 171-212). México City: Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana–Asociación Nacional de Universidades e Institutos de Enseñanza Superior. (First edition published in Chile: FLASCO, 1983).
• Brunner, J. J. & Hurtado, R. F. (2011). Educación Superior en Iberoamérica (Informe 2011) [Higher education in Latin America (2011 Report)]. Santiago: Universia–CINDA.
• Brunner, J. J. & Miranda, A. (2016). Educación Superior en Iberoamérica (Informe 2016) [Higher education in Latin America (2016 Report)]. Santiago: Universia–CINDA.
• Cano, D. (1985). La educación superior en la Argentina [Higher education in Argentina]. Buenos Aires: FLACSO, CRESALC, UNESCO, Grupo Editor Latinoamericano.
• Clark, B. (1983). The higher education system: Academic organization in cross-national perspective. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
• Clark, B. (2008a). The academic life: Small worlds, different worlds. In B. Clark (Ed.), On higher education: Selected writings, 1956–2006. Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press.
• Clark, B. (2008b). Differentiation and integration of the academic profession. In B. Clark (Ed.), On higher education: Selected writings, 1956–2006. Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press.
• Cummings, W. K., & Teichler, U. (2015). The relevance of the academy. In W. K. Cummings & U. Teichler (Eds.), The relevance of academic work in comparative perspective (pp. 1-15). Dordrecht: Springer.
• Galaz Fontes, J. F. (1999). La experiencia universitaria y la profesión académica. [University experience and the academic profession]. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 1(1), 1-14.
• Galaz Fontes, J. (2002). La satisfacción en el trabajo de académicos en una universidad pública estatal [Academic work satisfaction in public state universities]. Perfiles Educativos, 24(96), 47-72.
• Galaz Fontes, J. F., & Gil Antón, M. (2009). La profesión académica en México: un oficio en proceso de reconfiguración. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 11(2), 2-31. URL: http://redie.uabc.mx/vol11no2/contenido-galaz2.html
• García de Fanelli, A. (2009). Profesión académica en Argentina: carrera e incentivos a los docentes en las universidades nacionales [The academic profession in Argentina: Career paths and incentives for teachers in national universities]. Buenos Aires: CEDES.
• García Salord, S. (1998). Estudio socioantropológico de las clases medias urbanas en México: el capital social y el capital cultural como espacios de constitución simbólica de las clases sociales [Socio-anthropological study of urban middle classes in Mexico: Social capital and cultural capital as symbolic constitution spaces of social class] (Unpublished PhD thesis). Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico.
• García Salord, S. (2001). Las trayectorias académicas: de la diversidad a la heterogeneidad [Academic trajectories: From diversity to heterogeneity]. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, 6(11), 15-31.
• García Salord, S., Grediaga Kuri, R., & Landesmann Segall, M. (2003). Los académicos en México: hacia la constitución de un campo de conocimiento, 1993–2002 [Academics in Mexico: Toward the constitution of a field of knowledge, 1993–2002]. In P. Ducoing Watty (Ed.), Sujetos, actores y procesos de formación [Subjects, actors, and educational processes] (pp. 113-268). México: Consejo Mexicano de Investigación Educativa.
• García Salord, S., Grediaga Kuri, R., & Landesmann Segall, M. (2005). Introducción. De los estudios sobre los académicos hacia la constitución de un campo de conocimiento [Introduction: From studies on academia to the constitution of a field of knowledge]. In P. Ducoing Watty (Ed.), Sujetos, actores y procesos de formación (Vol. 8, T. 1, Part II, pp. 115–128) [Subjects, actors, and educational processes]. Mexico: Consejo Mexicano de Investigación Educativa.
• García Salord, S., Landesmann, M., & Gil Antón, M. (1993). Académicos [Academics]. México: Segundo Congreso Nacional de Investigación Educativa.
• Geertz, C. (1976). Toward an ethnography of the disciplines [Mimeo]. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Institute of Advanced Study.
• Gil Antón, M. (1994). Los rasgos de la diversidad. Un estudio sobre los académicos mexicanos [Features of diversity: A study of Mexican academics]. Mexico, DF: UAM.
• Gil Antón, M. (1997). Origen no es destino. Otra vuelta de tuerca a la diversidad del oficio académico en México [Origin is not destiny: Another twist to diversity in academic profession in Mexico]. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, 3(4), 255-297.
• Gil Antón, M. (2000). Los académicos en los noventas: ¿Actores, sujetos, espectadores o rehenes? [Academics in the nineties: Actors, subjects, spectators, or hostages?]. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 2(1), 101-116.
• Grediaga Kuri, R. (2001). Retos y condiciones de desarrollo: la profesión académica en México en la última década [Challenges and conditions for development: Academic profession in Mexico during the last decade]. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, 6(11), 95-117.
• Grediaga Kuri, R. (2006). Las políticas hacia los académicos en las últimas décadas. Cambios en la regulación de las trayectorias y el sistema de reconocimientos y recompensas de la profesión académica en México [Policies toward academics in recent decades: Regulatory changes in trajectories; The system of acknowledgements and awards of the academic profession in Mexico]. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 2, 49-120.
• Henkel, M. (2000). Academic identities and policy change in higher education. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
• Henkel, M. (2005). Academic identity and autonomy in a changing policy environment. Higher Education, 49(1-2), 155-176.
• Heras, L. G. (2005). La política de educación superior en México: los programas de estímulos a profesores e investigadores [Higher education policy in Mexico: Stimulus programs for teachers and researchers]. Educere, 9(29), 207-215.
• Kent, R. (1986). Los profesores y la crisis universitaria [Professors and the university crisis]. Cuadernos Políticos, 1986(46), 41-54.
• Krotsch, P., & Suasnábar, C. (2002). Los estudios sobre la Educación Superior: una reflexión en torno a la existencia y posibilidades de construcción de un campo [Studies on higher education: An insight into the existence of a field and the possibilities for its construction]. Revista Pensamiento Universitario, 10(10), 35-54.
• Landesmann, M. (1997). Identités académiques et génération. Le cas de enseignants de biochimie de l’Université Nationale Autonome du Mexique (UNAM) [Academic identities and generation: The case of biochemistry professors at the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM)] (Unpublished PhD thesis). Université de Paris X, France.
• Macfarlane, B. (2011). The morphing of academic practice: Unbundling and the rise of the para‐academic, Higher Education Quarterly, 65(1), 59-73.
• Marquina, M. (2013). ¿Hay una Profesión Académica Argentina? Avances y reflexiones sobre un objeto en construcción [Is there an Argentine academic profession? Advances and insights on an object under construction]. Revista Pensamiento Universitario, 15(15), 35-58.
• Marquina, M., & Fernandez Lamarra (2008). The academic profession in Argentina: Characteristics and trends in the context of a mass higher education system. In the proceedings of the International Conference on the Changing Academic Profession Project (pp. 363-387), January 28-30, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
• Marquina, M., & Rebello, G. (2012). The academic work at the periphery: Why Argentine scholars are satisfied despite all. In P. Bentley, H. Coates, I. R. Dobson, L. Goedegebuure, & V. Lynn Meek (Eds.), Job satisfaction around the academic world (pp. 13-28). Dordrecht: Springer.
• Marquina, M., Yuni, J., & Ferreiro, M. (2015). Generational change in the Argentine academic profession through the analysis of “life courses”. Studies in Higher Education, 40(8), 1392-1405
• Marquis, C. (2004). Universidades y profesores en Argentina: cambios y retos [Universities and professors in Argentina: Changes and challenges]. In P. Altbach (Ed.), El ocaso del gurú. La profesión académica en el tercer mundo [The dusk of the guru: The academic profession in the third world] (pp. 85-113). Mexico: Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana.
• Muñoz-García, A., & Bernasconi, A. (2020). Reassessing the progress of doctoral education in Chile. In M. Yudkevich, P. G. Altbach, & de Wit, H. (Eds.), Trends and issues in doctoral education: A global perspective (pp. 416-441). New Delhi: SAGE Publications India.
• Parra Sandoval, M. C. (2004). La percepción de los académicos sobre su participación en el gobierno universitario: Estudio de caso de cuatro universidades venezolanas [Academics’ perception of their participation in university governance: A study of four Venezuelan universities]. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, 9(22), 665-691.
• Pérez Centeno, C. (2017). El estudio de la profesión académica universitaria en argentina. Estado de situación y perspectivas [The study of university academic profession in Argentina: Situation and perspectives]. Integración y Conocimiento, 6(2), 226-255.
• Pérez Lindo, A. (1985). Universidad, política y sociedad [University, politics, and society]. Buenos Aires: EUDEBA.
• Prego, C., & Prati, M. (2007). Cultura académica y producción de conocimiento en el marco de las políticas de incentivos. Un enfoque comparado de ciencia básica y humanidades [Academic culture and knowledge production in the context of incentives policies: A comparative focus of basic science and the humanities]. In P. Krotsch, A. Camou, & M. Prati (Eds.), Evaluando la evaluación: políticas universitarias, instituciones y actores en Argentina y América Latina [Evaluating evaluation: University policies, institutions, and actors in Argentina and Latin America] (pp. 267-296). Buenos Aires: Prometeo.
• Schneijderberg, C. & Merkator, N. (2013). The new higher education professionals. In B. Kehm & U. Teichler (Eds.), The academic profession in Europe: New tasks and new challenges (pp. 53-92). Dordrecht: Springer.
• Schriewer, J. (2013). Cultura mundial y mundos de significado culturalmente específicos [World culture and culturally specific worlds of meaning]. Educar Em Revista, (49), 275-297.
• Schwartzman, S., & Balbachevsky, E. (1996). The academic profession in Brazil. In P. G. Altbach (Ed.), The international academic profession: Portraits of fourteen countries (pp. 231-280). Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
• Schwartzman, S., & Balbachevsky, E. (2014). Research and teaching in a diverse institutional environment: Converging values and diverging practices in Brazil. In J. Shin, A. Arimoto, W. K. Cummings, & U. Teichler (Eds.), Teaching and research in contemporary higher education (pp. 221-235). Dordrecht: Springer.
• Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2004). The global politics of educational borrowing and lending. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
• Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2017). Comparing the receptions and translations of global educational policy, understanding the logic of educational systems. In T. Jules (Ed.), The global educational policy environment in the fourth industrial revolution (pp. 35-57). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.
• Suasnábar, C., Seoane, V., & Deldivedro, V. (1999). Modelos de articulación académica. Cultura e identidad de los docentes–investigadores de la UNLP [Models of academic articulation: Culture and identity of professors–researchers in the UNLP]. In G. Tiramonti, C. Suasnábar, & V. Seoane (Eds.), Políticas de modernización universitaria y cambio institucional (Serie Estudios e Investigaciones, Vol. 38) [Policies of university modernization and institutional change] (pp. 47-66). La Plata: Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación, UNLP.
• Unzué, M. (2013), Autonomía, evaluación y políticas públicas. Tendencias y límites en los sistemas universitarios de Argentina y Brasil [Autonomy, evaluation and public policies. Trends and limits in the university systems of Argentina and Brazil]. In M. Unzué & S. Emiliozzi (Eds.), Universidad y políticas públicas ¿En busca del tiempo perdido? Argentina y Brasil en perspectiva comparada [University and public policies. In search of lost time? Argentina and Brazil in comparative perspective] (pp. 9-48). Buenos Aires: Imago Mundi.
• Villa Lever, L. (2001). El mercado académico: la incorporación, la definitividad y las promociones, pasos para una misma trayectoria de formación [The academic market: Incorporation, definitiveness, and promotions; Steps toward the same educational trajectory]. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, 6(11), 63-77.
• Whitchurch, C. (2012). Reconstructing identities in higher education: The rise of third space professionals. New York, NY: Routledge.