Comparison of Geological Structures and Satellite-based Tectonic Lineaments in Gülağaç (Aksaray) and its Surroundings

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 3, 123 - 129, 30.09.2024

Ramazan Demircioğlu

https://doi.org/10.17350/HJSE19030000339

Öz

The study area covers the Gülagaç district of Aksaray and its surroundings in the Central Anatolia region of Turkey. The basement of the study area consists of metamorphic rocks belonging to the Paleozoic–Mesozoic-aged Kaman Group. Mesozoic-aged ophiolites overlie these rocks, and both are cut by Late Cretaceous-aged igneous rocks. These units were then overlain by Palaeocene-Quaternary-aged volcanic and sedimentary units. The region has important geological structures that have undergone polyphase deformation, especially in the Eocene units. As a result of these deformations, faults, fractures, folds and linearities were formed. . These structures were compared with satellite-based tectonic lineaments, and it was observed that the general orientations of the lines determined in the field and the satellite-based lineaments were largely compatible. The results of this study can make an important contribution to the exploration of mineral and geothermal resources in the region.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Turkey, Central Anatolia, Aksaray, Gulagac, tectonic lineaments.

Kaynakça

• 1. Kuşcu I. Geochemistry and mineralogy of the skarns in the Celebi district, Kırıkkale, Turkey. Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences. 2001;10:121-132.
• 2. Rigo de Righi M, Cortesini A. Regional studies of the Central Anatolian basins progress report. PDR Turkish Gulf Oil Co.Report No. II; 1960.
• 3. Beekman PH. The Pliocene and Quaternary volcanism in the Hasan Dağ-Melendiz Dağ region, MTA Bulletin. 1966;2:90-105.
• 4. Arıkan Y. Tuz Gölü havzasının jeolojisi ve petrol imkanları, M.T.A. Dergisi. 1975;3: 17-37.
• 5. Görür N, Derman AS. Tuzgölü-Haymana havzasının stratigrafik ve tektonik analizi, TPAO Rapor no: 1514;1978.
• 6. Uygun A. Tuzgölü havzasının jeolojisi, evaporit oluşumları ve hidrokarbon olanakları, TJK İç Anadolu’nun Jeolojisi Sempozyumu. 1981; 66-71.
• 7. Görür N, Oktay FY, Seymen İ, Şengör AMC. Paleotectonic evolution of the Tuzgölü basin complex, Central Turkey. Sedimentary record of a Neo-Tethyan closure, The Geological Evolution of the Eastern Mediterranean. Geology Society Special Publication, 17, In J.E. Dixon, and A.H.F. Robertson (eds.). Oxford. 1984;17: 467-482.
• 8. Atabey E, Tarhan N, Akarsu B, Taşkıran A. Şereflikoçhisar, Panlı (Ankara) Acıpınar (Niğde) Yöresinin Jeolojisi, Maden Tetkik ve Arama Genel Müdürlüğü Raporu no: 8155;1987.
• 9. Dellaloğlu A. Ankara ili-Tuz Gölü arasındaki Neotetis’in kuzey kolunun evrimi (Haymana-Tuzgölü Basenlerinin stratigrafileri ve jeoteknik evrimleri, Ph.D. Thesis, Çukurova University, Adana;1997.
• 10. Çemen İ, Göncüoğlu MC, Dirik K. Structural evolution of the Tuzgölü basin in Central Anatolia.Turkey, Journal of Geology. 1999. p. 693-706.
• 11. Dirik K, Erol O. Tuzgölü ve çevresinin tektonomorfolojik evrimi, Orta Anadolu-Türkiye. TPJD Özel sayı. 2003.p. 27-46.
• 12. Uçar L. Hanobası-Karapınar (KB Aksaray) alanının stratigrafik incelenmesi. Geosound 2008;52:185-212.
• 13. Lahn NE. Türkiye Deprem Haritası Hakkında Muhtıra. M.T.A.Dergisi. 1944. p. 364-371.
• 14. Pasquare G. Geology of the Cenozoic Volcanic area of Central Anatolia, Atti Della Accad. Nazio. Dei. Lincei, Memorie, ser. 1968.p. 55- 204.
• 15. Innocenti F, Mazzuoli R, Pasquare G, Radicati F, Villari L. Neogene calc-alkaline volcanism of Central Anatolia: geochronological data on Kayseri-Niğde area, Geological Magazine. 1975. p. 349-360.
• 16. Ercan T, Fujitani T, Matsuda JI, Tokel S, Notsu K, Ul T, Can B, Selvi Y, Yıldırım, T, Fisekei A, Ölmez M, Akbaslı A. The origin and evolution of the Cenozoic volcanism of Hasandağı Karacadağ area (Central Anatolia). Jeomorfoloji Dergisi 1990.p. 39- 54.
• 17. Türeli TK. Geology, Petrology and Geochemistry of Ekecikdağ Plutonic Rocks (Aksaray Region-Central Anatolia). ODTÜ, Doktora tezi;1991.
• 18. Güleç N. Rb-Sr isotope data from the Ağaçören granitoid (East of Tuz Gölü): Geochronological and genetical implications, Tr. J. of Earth Sciences. 1994. p. 39-43.
• 19. Güleç N, and Kadıoğlu YK. Relative Involvement of Mantle and Crustal Components in the Ağaçören Granitoid (Central Anatolia-Turkey): Estimates from Trace Element and Sr-Isotope Data. Chemie der Erde. 1998. p. 23-37.
• 20. Göncüoğlu MC, Dirik K, Erler A, Yalınız K, Özgül L, Çemen İ. Tuzgölü havzası batı kısmının temel jeolojik sorunları TPAO Rapor No: 3753;1996.
• 21. Güllü B, Yıldız M. Mamasun (Aksaray) Gabroyidlerinin Petrojenetik Karakteristiği, KSÜ Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi. 2012. p.28-42.
• 22. Şaroğlu F, Emre Ö, Boray A. Türkiye Diri Fayları ve Depremsellikleri, Maden Tetkik ve Arama Genel Müdürlüğü Jeoloji Etütleri Dairesi,Rapor No:8174; 1987.
• 23. Dirik K, Göncüoğlu MC. Neotectonic characteristics of Central Anatolia, International Geology Review. 1996. p. 807-817.
• 24. Koçyiğit A, Beyhan A. A new intracontinental transcurrent structure; the Central Anatolian Fault Zone, Turkey. Tectonophysics. 1998. p. 317–336.
• 25. Koçyiğit A. Orta Anadolunun Sismisitesi ve Neotektonik Özellikleri, Türkiye Petrol Jeologları Derneği, Özel Sayı. 2003. p. 1-26.
• 26. Koçyiğit, A., Özacar, A. Extensional neotectonic regime through the NE edge of the Outer Isparta Angle, SW Turkey: New Field and Seismic Data, Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences. 2003;12: 67-90.
• 27. Şaroğlu F, Emre Ö, Boray A. Türkiye Diri Fay Haritası, Maden Tetkik Arama Genel Müdürlüğü.1992.
• 28. Emre Ö. Hasandağı-Keçiboyduran dağı yöresi volkanizmasının jeomorfolojisi, Tuz Gölü Fay Zonunun Neotektonik Özellikleri, İstanbul Üniversitesi, Deniz bilimleri ve Coğrafya Enstitüsü Doktora tezi; 1991.
• 29. Koçyiğit A. General neotectonic characteristics and seismicity of Central Anatolia, Haymana-Tuzgölü-Ulukışla basenlerinin uygulamalı çalışması (workshop). Abstracts. 2000. p. 1-26.
• 30. Kürçer A. Tuz Gölü Fay Zonu’nun Neotektonik Özellikleri ve Paleosismolojisi, Orta Anadolu, Türkiye, Ankara Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Doktora Tezi; 2012.
• 31. Kürçer A, Gökten YE. Paleosismolojik Üç Boyutlu Sanal Fotoğraflama Yöntemi, Örnek Çalışma: Duru-2011 Hendeği, Tuz Gölü Fay Zonu, Orta Anadolu, Türkiye. Türkiye Jeoloji Bülteni. 2014 Jan 57(1):45-72.
• 32. Sari, M., Seren, A., Alemdag, S. Determination of geological structures by geophysical and geotechnical techniques in Kırklartepe Dam Site (Turkey). Journal of Applied Geophysics. 2020;182:104174.
• 33. Sari, M. Geophysical and numerical approaches to solving the mechanisms of landslides triggered by earthquakes: A case study of Kahramanmaraş (6 February, 2023). Engineering Science and Technology. 2024;55:101758.
• 34. Öztürk, S., Beker, Y., Sarı, M., Pehlivan, L. Estimation of ground types in different districts of Gümüşhane province based on the ambient vibrations H/V measurements. Sigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences. 2021;39(4):374-391.
• 35. Junaid, M., Abdullah, R. A., Saari, R., Ali, W., Islam, A., Sari, M. 3D modelling and feasibility assessment of granite deposit using 2D electrical resistivity tomography, borehole, and unmanned aerial vehicle survey. Journal of Mining and Environment. 2022; 13(4):929-942.
• 36. Shirazi A, Hezarkhani A, Pour AB. Fusion of lineament factor (Lf) map analysis and multifractal technique for massive sulfide copper exploration: The Sahlabad area, East Iran. Minerals. 2022;12(5):549.
• 37. Nouri R, Arian M. Multifractal modelling of gold mineralization and lineaments in the 1: 100,000 Chaapaan sheet (NW IRAN). Journal of Mining and Environment. 2023. p. 973-980.
• 38. Sassioui S, Lakhloufi A, Aarab A, Zouggarh A, El Hilali M, Courba S, Larabi A. Contribution of Remote Sensing to the Mapping of Lineaments and Ore-Mineral Occurrences in the Taghbalt Region, Moroccan Eastern Anti-Atlas. The Iraqi Geological Journal. 2023. p. 307-323.
• 39. Dutra LF, Louro VHA, Monteiro LVS. The southern IOCG and hydrothermal nickel mineralization trend of the Carajás Mineral Province: Airborne geophysical and remote sensing evidence for structural controls and hydrothermal signature. Journal of Applied Geophysics. 2023;213:105016.
• 40. Arrofi D, Abu-Mahfouz IS, Prayudi SD. Investigating high permeable zones in non- volcanic geothermal systems using lineament analysis and fault fracture density (FFD): northern Konawe Regency, Indonesia. Geothermal Energy. 2022. p. 1-17.
• 41. Heriawan MN, Hafizsyah RA, Hanunah JS, Hede ANH, Malik D. Surface and Subsurface Fracture Zones Modeling Using Automatic Lineament Analysis and Geostatistical Method, with Case Study of Wayang Windu Geothermal Field, West Java, Indonesia. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. IOP Publishing; 2020.
• 42. Solomon S, Ghebreab W. Lineament characterization and their tectonic significance using Landsat TM data and field studies in the central highlands of Eritrea. Journal of African Earth Sciences. 2006. p. 371-378.
• 43. Benaafi M, Hariri M, Abdullatif O, Makkawi M, Al-Shaibani A. Analysis of lineaments within the Wajid Group, SW Saudi Arabia, and their tectonic significance. Arabian Journal of Geosciences. 2017. p. 1-17.
• 44. Akram MS, Mirza K, Zeeshan M, Ali I. Correlation of tectonics with geologic lineaments interpreted from remote sensing data for Kandiah Valley, Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Journal of the Geological Society of India 2019. p. 607-613.
• 45. Baruah MP, Goswami TK, Bezbaruah D. Understanding the tectonics of the Mikir massif, northeast India: insights from lineament analysis. Arabian Journal of Geosciences. 2023;16(10):545.
• 46. Seymen İ. Kaman (Kırşehir) dolayında Kırşehir Masifi’nin stratigrafisi ve metamorfizması. Türkiye Jeoloji Kurumu Bülteni. 1981. p. 7-14.
• 47. Göçmez G. Aksaray Sıcak ve Mineralli Su Kaynaklarının Hidrojeolojik İncelemesi, Aksaray Valiliği, Yeni Aksaray Ofset Tesisleri, Aksaray.1997.
• 48. Envi, ENVI, Harris Geospatial Solutions; 2018.
• 49. Esri, USA; 2020.
• 50. Geomatica, PCI Geomatics, Canada; 2018.
• 51. Rockwork (RockWare Inc., Golden, USA; 2019.
• 52. Stereonet, W. Allmendinger; 2016.
• 53. Sedrette S, Rebai N. Automatic extraction of lineaments from Landsat Etm+ images and their structural interpretation: Case Study in Nefza region (North West of Tunisia). Journal of Research in Environmental and Earth Sciences. 2016. p. 139-145.