htd / hmj

Hipokrat Tıp Dergisi

2791-9935

Bandırma Onyedi Eylül Üniversitesi

10.58961/hmj.1826571

Surgery (Other)

Cerrahi (Diğer)

Surgical Treatments for Rectocele in Adult Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Erişkin Kadınlarda Rektosele Cerrahi Yaklaşımlar: Sistematik Derleme ve Meta-Analiz

https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2852-1515

Avşar

Güliz

Department of General Surgery, Golkoy State Hospital, Golkoy, Ordu, Turkey.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7933-0349

Sacin

Yunus Emre

Department of General Surgery, Dosemealti State Hospital, Ciplakli, Dosemealti, Antalya, Turkey

https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9359-3680

Celenk

Muhammed Yasir

Department of General Surgery, Golkoy State Hospital, Golkoy, Ordu, Turkey.

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5819-8484

Örmeci

Mustafa

Department of General Surgery, Bandirma Training and Research Hospital, Bandirma, Balikesir, Turkey

04 20 2026

6 1 18 28 11 19 2025 12 18 2025

2021

Hipokrat Tıp Dergisi

Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of major surgical interventions used for rectocele repair in adult women and to synthesize contemporary evidence on anatomical, functional, and patient-reported outcomes.Methods: Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, studies published between 1998 and 2025 were searched across major databases. Eligible designs included RCTs, prospective/retrospective cohorts, and case series (>10 patients) reporting rectocele-specific outcomes with ≥12 months of follow-up. Forty-five studies met inclusion criteria (12 RCTs, 33 observational), and 20 were included in meta-analysis. Primary outcomes were anatomical success, resolution of obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS), recurrence, and reoperation; secondary outcomes included mesh-related complications, dyspareunia, fecal incontinence, and de novo constipation.Results: Meta-analysis demonstrated significantly lower anatomical recurrence after transvaginal native tissue repair compared with transanal repair (pooled RR ≈ 0.25). Mesh augmentation for posterior compartment prolapse did not improve subjective or objective outcomes and was associated with mesh exposures (5–10%). STARR provided substantial short-term ODS improvement (70–90% of patients) but showed notable long-term recurrence (20–30%) and reintervention rates (~20%). Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy (LVMR) offered the most durable improvement, with 80–95% symptom relief and low recurrence and complication rates, particularly in patients with internal rectal prolapse or multicompartment defects.Conclusion: Native tissue posterior colporrhaphy remains the first-line surgical treatment for symptomatic rectocele. STARR is beneficial for selected ODS-dominant patients but lacks long-term durability. Mesh use in the posterior compartment offers no meaningful benefit and carries additional risks; therefore, it should not be routinely used. Ventral mesh rectopexy demonstrates superior functional outcomes in complex cases and is an effective option for women with combined rectocele and internal rectal prolapse. Optimal management should be individualized and anatomically guided.

Amaç: Bu sistematik derleme ve meta-analizin amacı, erişkin kadınlarda rektocele bağlı semptomların cerrahi tedavisinde kullanılan başlıca yöntemleri karşılaştırmak ve güncel literatür doğrultusunda etkinlik–güvenlik profillerini değerlendirmektir.Yöntem: PRISMA 2020 kılavuzuna uygun olarak 1998–2025 yılları arasında yayımlanmış çalışmalar tarandı. Dahil etme kriterleri erişkin kadın popülasyonu, rektocele için uygulanan cerrahi girişim, ≥12 ay takip ve ≥10 hasta içeren çalışma tasarımları idi. Toplam 45 çalışma (12 RCT, 33 gözlemsel) analiz edildi; 20 çalışma meta-analize dahil edildi. Temel sonuçlar anatomik başarı, obstrüktif defekasyon sendromu (ODS) düzelmesi, rekürrens ve reoperasyon oranları; ikincil sonuçlar ise meş komplikasyonları, disparoni, fekal inkontinans ve de novo konstipasyondu.Bulgular: Meta-analiz, transvajinal posterior kolporafinin transanal onarıma göre anlamlı derecede daha düşük rekürrens oranı sunduğunu göstermiştir (RR ≈ 0.25). Meş ile güçlendirilmiş posterior onarım, yerli doku tamirine göre belirgin bir avantaj sağlamamış; buna karşın meş erozyonu ve ağrı gibi komplikasyonlar %5–10 oranlarında görülmüştür. STARR, kısa dönemde ODS semptomlarını belirgin biçimde azaltmasına rağmen, uzun dönemde rekürrens ve yeniden müdahale gereksinimi %20–30 düzeyine ulaşmıştır. Laparoskopik ventral meş rektopeksi; ODS, intussusepsiyon ve çoklu kompartman prolapsusu olan hastalarda %80–95 iyileşme oranları ve düşük komplikasyon profili ile en güçlü seçeneklerden biri olarak öne çıkmıştır.Sonuç: Erişkin kadınlarda rektocele tedavisinde yerli doku posterior kolporafi çoğu hasta için birinci basamak cerrahi olmaya devam etmektedir. STARR seçilmiş ODS-dominant hastalarda etkili olmakla birlikte, uzun dönem başarısı sınırlıdır. Posterior kompartmanda meş kullanımı anlamlı fayda sağlamadığından önerilmemektedir. Ventral meş rektopeksi, karmaşık veya çoklu prolapsuslu hastalarda üstün fonksiyonel sonuçlar sunmaktadır. Tedavi kararı mutlaka bireyselleştirilmeli, anatomi–fonksiyon ilişkisi bütüncül olarak değerlendirilmelidir.

rektosel Posterior vajinal duvar prolapsusu Obstrüktif defekasyon sendromu Posterior kolporafi STARR Ventral meş rektopeksi Pelvik taban cerrahisi

Pelvic floor surgery Ventral mesh rectopexy STARR Rectocele Posterior vaginal wall prolapse Obstructed defecation syndrome

Jelovsek JE, Maher C, Barber MD. Pelvic organ prolapse. The Lancet. 2007 Mar;369(9566):1027–38.

Bump RC, Norton PA. Epidemiology and natural history of pelvic floor dysfunction. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1998 Dec;25(4):723–46.

Mowat A, Maher D, Baessler K, Christmann-Schmid C, Haya N, Maher C. Surgery for women with posterior compartment prolapse. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2018 Mar 5;2018(3).

Hendrix SL, Clark A, Nygaard I, Aragaki A, Barnabei V, McTiernan A. Pelvic organ prolapse in the women’s health initiative: Gravity and gravidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Jun;186(6):1160–6.

Shorvon PJ, McHugh S, Diamant NE, Somers S, Stevenson GW. Defecography in normal volunteers: results and implications. Gut. 1989 Dec 1;30(12):1737–49.

U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Urogynecologic surgical mesh: update on the safety and effectiveness of transvaginal mesh. . 2011.

Longo A. Obstructed defecation because of rectal pathologies. Novel surgical treatment: stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR). Ann Clevel Clin Florida Color Dis Symp. . Ann Clevel Clin Florida Color Dis Symp. 2004;27345262.

Ripamonti L, Guttadauro A, Lo Bianco G, Rennis M, Maternini M, Cioffi G, et al. Stapled Transanal Rectal Resection (Starr) in the Treatment of Obstructed Defecation: A Systematic Review. Front Surg. 2022 Feb 14;9.

Boccasanta P, Venturi M, Stuto A, Bottini C, Caviglia A, Carriero A, et al. Stapled Transanal Rectal Resection for Outlet Obstruction: A Prospective, Multicenter Trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004 Sep;47(9):1285–97.

Jayne DG, Schwandner O, Stuto A. Stapled Transanal Rectal Resection for Obstructed Defecation Syndrome: One-Year Results of the European STARR Registry. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009 Jul;52(7):1205–12.

D’Hoore A, Cadoni R, Penninckx F. Long-term outcome of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for total rectal prolapse. British Journal of Surgery. 2004 Oct 21;91(11):1500–5.

D’Hoore A, Penninckx F. Laparoscopic ventral recto(colpo)pexy for rectal prolapse: surgical technique and outcome for 109 patients. Surg Endosc. 2006 Dec 9;20(12):1919–23.

Pescatori M, Spyrou M, Cobellis L, Bottini C, Tessera G. The rectal pocket syndrome after stapled mucosectomy. Colorectal Disease. 2006 Nov 24;8(9):808–11.

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;n71.

Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;l4898.

Wells GA SBOD et al. T. The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. 2011;

DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986 Sep;7(3):177–88.

Higgins JPT. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003 Sep 6;327(7414):557–60.

Nieminen K, Hiltunen KM, Laitinen J, Oksala J, Heinonen PK. Transanal or Vaginal Approach to Rectocele Repair: A Prospective, Randomized Pilot Study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004 Oct;47(10):1636–42.

Leanza V, Intagliata E, Leanza G, Cannizzaro MA, Zanghì G, Vecchio R. Surgical repair of rectocele. Comparison of transvaginal and transanal approach and personal technique. G Chir. 2013;34(11–12):332–6.

Reid FM, Aucott L, Glazener CMA, Elders A, Hemming C, Cooper KG, et al. PROSPECT: 4- and 6-year follow-up of a randomised trial of surgery for vaginal prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2023 Jan 26;34(1):67–78.

Reid F, Elders A, Breeman S, Freeman R. How common are complications following polypropylene mesh, biological xenograft and native tissue surgery for pelvic organ prolapse? A secondary analysis from the PROSPECT trial. BJOG. 2021 Dec 27;128(13):2180–9.

Paraiso MFR, Barber MD, Muir TW, Walters MD. Rectocele repair: A randomized trial of three surgical techniques including graft augmentation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Dec;195(6):1762–71.

Roman H, Michot F. Long-Term Outcomes of Transanal Rectocele Repair. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 Mar;48(3):510–7.

Aubert M, Mege D, Le Huu Nho R, Meurette G, Sielezneff I. Surgical management of the rectocele – An update. J Visc Surg. 2021 Apr;158(2):145–57.

Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Schmid C. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. In: Maher C, editor. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2013.

Tsunoda A, Kusanagi H. Annual long-term functional outcomes after transanal repair for symptomatic rectocele. Ann Coloproctol. 2022 Nov 15;

Zhang B, Ding JH, Yin SH, Zhang M, Zhao K. Stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defecation syndrome associated with rectocele and rectal intussusception. World J Gastroenterol. 2010 May 28;16(20):2542–8.

Hasan HM, Hasan HM. Stapled transanal rectal resection for the surgical treatment of obstructed defecation syndrome associated with rectocele and rectal intussusception. ISRN Surg. 2012;2012:652345.

Van Geluwe B, Stuto A, Da Pozzo F, Fieuws S, Meurette G, Lehur PA, et al. Relief of obstructed defecation syndrome after stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR): a meta-analysis. Acta Chir Belg. 2014;114(3):189–97.

Podzemny V. Management of obstructed defecation. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(4):1053.

Köhler K, Stelzner S, Hellmich G, Lehmann D, Jackisch T, Fankhänel B, et al. Results in the long-term course after stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR). Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2012 Jun 21;397(5):771–8.

Madbouly KM, Abbas KS, Hussein AM. Disappointing Long‐Term Outcomes After Stapled Transanal Rectal Resection for Obstructed Defecation. World J Surg. 2010 Sep 9;34(9):2191–6.

Goede AC, Glancy D, Carter H, Mills A, Mabey K, Dixon AR. Medium‐term results of stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) for obstructed defecation and symptomatic rectal‐anal intussusception. Colorectal Disease. 2011 Sep 17;13(9):1052–7.

Pescatori M, Gagliardi G. Postoperative complications after procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids (PPH) and stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) procedures. Tech Coloproctol. 2008 Mar 30;12(1):7–19.

Andreoli R, Zampieri N, Orlandi S, Geccherle A, Castellani RL. Long time consequences after STARR procedure: Report of 15 years experience and medico-legal perspective. The American Journal of Surgery. 2024 Mar;229:169–73.

Maejima T, Kono T, Fukahori S, Yoshikawa D, Karasaki H, Araki Y, et al. Evacuatory Dysfunction after Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy: A Case Report of Rectal Pocket Syndrome. J Anus Rectum Colon. 2020 Apr 28;4(2):85–8.

Consten ECJ, van Iersel JJ, Verheijen PM, Broeders IAMJ, Wolthuis AM, D’Hoore A. Long-term Outcome After Laparoscopic Ventral Mesh Rectopexy. Ann Surg. 2015 Nov;262(5):742–8.

Maggiori L, Bretagnol F, Ferron M, Panis Y. Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy: a prospective long-term evaluation of functional results and quality of life. Tech Coloproctol. 2013 Aug 23;17(4):431–6.

van Iersel JJ, Paulides TJC, Verheijen PM, Lumley JW, Broeders IAMJ, Consten ECJ. Current status of laparoscopic and robotic ventral mesh rectopexy for external and internal rectal prolapse. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22(21):4977.

Varela C, Terán A, Lopez S, Millan G. Rectal Pocket Syndrome: A Symptomatic Rectal Pseudodiverticula as a Long-Term Complication of Failed Purse-String Suture During Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy. World J Colorectal Surg. 2023 Apr;12(2):48–50.

Iglesia CB, Fenner DE, Brubaker L. The use of mesh in gynecologic surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 1997 Mar;8(2):105–15.

Glazener CM, Breeman S, Elders A, Hemming C, Cooper KG, Freeman RM, et al. Mesh, graft, or standard repair for women having primary transvaginal anterior or posterior compartment prolapse surgery: two parallel-group, multicentre, randomised, controlled trials (PROSPECT). The Lancet. 2017 Jan;389(10067):381–92.

Stuto A, Renzi A, Carriero A, Gabrielli F, Gianfreda V, Villani RD, et al. Stapled Trans-Anal Rectal Resection (STARR) in the Surgical Treatment of the Obstructed Defecation Syndrome. Surg Innov. 2011 Sep 8;18(3):248–53.

Bhandarkar DS. Laparoscopic rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse: mesh, no mesh or a ventral mesh? J Minim Access Surg. 2014 Jan;10(1):1–3.

Cai SL, Chen T, Yao LQ, Zhong YS. Management of iatrogenic colorectal perforation: From surgery to endoscopy. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;7(8):819.

Na SK, Jung HK, Shim KN, Jung SA, Chung SS. Iatrogenic Rectal Diverticulum With Pelvic-Floor Dysfunction in Patients After a Procedure for a Prolapsed Hemorrhoid. Ann Coloproctol. 2014 Feb 28;30(1):50–3.