Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2020, , 123 - 133, 01.12.2020
https://doi.org/10.16882/hortis.810011

Abstract

References

  • Abdel Gawad, G., Arslan, A., Gaihbe, A., & Kadouri F. (2005). The effects of saline irrigation water management and salt tolerant tomato varieties on sustainable production of tomato in Syria (1999-2002). Agricultural Water Management, 78(1-2): 39-53.
  • Anonymous (2018a). http://bahcebitkileri.cu.edu.tr/upload/nturemis/turkiyeortualti.pdf (Data accessed April 25, 2018).
  • Anonymous (2018b). www.tarim.gov.tr (Date accessed April 25, 2018).
  • Atay, A.N. (2006). Harran ovası koşullarında damla sulama sistemi ile sulanan biberin tuza dayanımının belirlenmesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Harran Üniversitesi, Şanlıurfa.
  • Baran, M.F., & Gökdoğan, O. (2014). Karpuz ve kavun yetiştiriciliğinde enerji girdi-çıktı analizi: Kırklareli ili örneği. Anadolu Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 29(3): 217-224.
  • Baran, M.F., Oğuz, H.İ., & Gökdoğan, O. (2016). Determining the energy usage efficiency of walnut (Juglans Regia L.) cultivation in Turkey. Erwerbs-Obstbau, 59(1):77-82.
  • Bilalis, D., Kamariari, P.E., Karkanis, A., Efthimiadou, A., Zorpas, A., & Kakabouki, I. (2013). Energy inputs, output and productivity in organic and conventional maize and tomato production, under Mediterranean conditions. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici, 41(1): 190-194.
  • Cuartero, J., & Fernandez-Munoz, R. (1999). Tomato and salinity. Scientia Horticulture, 78: 83-125.
  • Çanakçı, M., & Akıncı, I. (2006). Energy use pattern analyses of greenhouse vegetable production. Energy, 31: 1243–1256.
  • Çanakçı, M., Topakçı, M., Akıncı, İ., & Özmerzi, A. (2005). Energy use pattern of some field crops and vegetable production: case study for Antalya region, Turkey. Energy and Conversion Management, 46(4): 655–666.
  • Çetin, B., & Vardar, A. (2008). An economic analysis of energy requirements and input costs for tomato production in Turkey. Renewable Energy, 33(3): 428-433.
  • Darijani, F., Veisi, H., Khoshbakht, K., Liaghati, H., & Alipour, A. (2012). An input-output energy analysis in intensive agro-ecosystems: a case study of greenhouse cucumber production in Varamin county of Tehran province, Iran. Environmental Sciences, 10(1): 79-90.
  • De, D., Singh, S., & Chandra, H. (2001) Technological impact on energy consumption in rain fed soybean cultivation in Madhya Pradesh. Applied Energy, 70: 193–213.
  • Dimitrijević, A., Đević, M., Blažin, S., & Blažin, D. (2010). Energy efficiency of the lettuce greenhouse production. http://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID= RS2011000353 (Data accessed: November 25, 2019)
  • Dimitrijević, A., Blažin, S., Blažin, D., & Ponjican, O. (2015). Energy efficiency of the tomato open field and greenhouse production system. Journal on Processing and Energy in Agriculture, 19(3): 132-135. Ekinci, K., Akbolat, D., Demircan, V., & Ekinci, C. (2005). Isparta ili elma üretiminde enerji kullanım etkinliğinin belirlenmesi. 3. Yenilenebilir Enerji Kaynakları Sempozyumu, 19-21 Ekim 2005, Mersin.
  • Flowers, T.J., Galal, H.K., & Bromham, L. (2010). Evolution of halophytes: multiple origins of salt tolerance in land plants. Functional Plant Biology, 37:604–612.
  • Hatırlı, S.A., Özkan, B., & Fert, C. (2006). Energy inputs and crop yield relationship in greenhouse tomato production. Renewable Energy, 31: 427-438.
  • İbrahim, H.Y. (2011). Energy use pattern in vegetable production under fadama in North Central Nigeria. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems, 14(2011): 1019-1024.
  • Jadidi, M.R., Sabuni, M.S., Homayounifar, M., & Mohammadi, A. (2012). Assessment of energy use pattern for tomato production in Iran: A case study from the Marand region. Research in Agricultural Engineering, 58(2): 50-56.
  • Kesmez, G.D. (2003). Tuzluluk koşullarında domateste suya dayanıma, su kullanıma ve vejetatif gelişmeye etkisi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi, Ankara.
  • Kuswardhani, N., Soni, P., & Shivakoti, G.P. (2013). Comparative energy input-output and financial analyses of greenhouse and open field vegetables production in West Java, Indonesia. Energy, 53(2013): 83-92.
  • Lopez, M.V., & Satti, S.M.E. (1996). Calcium and potassium-enhanced growth and yield of tomato under sodium chloride stress. Plant Science, 114(1): 19-27.
  • Maas, E.V., & Grattan, S.R. (1999). Crop Yields as Affected by Salinity. pp: 55-108. In: Agricultural Drainage. Chapter: Crop Yields as Affected by Salinity. Publisher: American Society of Agronomy. Editors: R. W. Skaggs and J. van Schilfgaarde.
  • Mandal, K.G., Saha, K.P., Gosh, P.L., Hati, K.M. & Bandyopadhyay, K.K. (2002). Bioenergy and economic analyses of soybean based crop production systems in central India. Biomass & Bioenergy, 23: 337–345.
  • Mihov, M., & Antonova, G. (2009). Energy assessment of monoculture and intercropping growing systems of broccoli. Proceedings of International Conference “Soil tillage and ecology”, 1-5 September 2009, Albena/ Bulgaria, p: 190-195.
  • Mihov, M., & Tringovska, I. (2010). Energy efficiency improvement of greenhouse tomato production by applying new biofertilizers. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 16(4): 454-458.
  • Mirasi, A., Samadi, M., & Rabiee, A.H. (2015). An analytical method to survey the energy input-output and emissions of greenhouse gases from wheat and tomato farms in Iran. Biological Forum, 7(1): 52-58.
  • Mohammadi, A., & Omid, M. (2010). Economical analysis and relation between energy inputs and yield of greenhouse cucumber production in Iran. Applied Energy, 87(1):191-196.
  • Mohammadi, A., Tabatabaeefar, A., Shahin, S., Rafiee, S., & Keyhani, A. (2008). Energy use and economical analysis of potato production in Iran a case study: Ardabil province. Energy Conversion and Management, 49(12): 3566–3570.
  • Monjezi, N., Sheikhdavoodi, M.J., & Taki, M. (2011). Energy use pattern and optimization of energy consumption for greenhouse cucumber production in Iran using data envelopment analysis (DEA). Modern Applied Science, 5(6): 139-151.
  • Özkan, B., Kürklü, A., & Akçaöz, H. (2004). An input-output energy analysis in greenhouse vegetable production: a case study for Antalya region of Turkey. Biomass Bioenergy, 26(1): 189-195.
  • Pahlavan, R., Omid, M., & Akram, A. (2011). Modeling and sensivity analysis of energy inputs for greenhouse cucumber production. Journal of Agricultural Technology, 7(6): 1509-1521.
  • Pahlavan, R., Omid, M., & Akram, A. (2012). The relationship between energy inputs and crop yield in greenhouse basil production. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 14: 1243-1253.
  • Pascale, S., Angelino, G., Graziani, G., Maggio, A., & Pascale, S. (2003). Effect of salt stress on water relations and antioxidant activity in tomato, Acta-Horticulturae, 613: 39-46.
  • Pashaee, F., Rahmati, M.H., & Pashaee, P. (2008). Study and determination of energy consumption to produce tomato in the greenhouse. The 5th National Conference on Agricultural Machinery Engineering and Mechanization, 27-28 August 2008, Mashhad/Iran.
  • Rafiee, S., Seyed, H., Mousavi, A., & Ali, M. (2010). Modeling and sensivity analysis of energy inputs for apple production in Iran. Energy, 35: 3301-3306.
  • Razavinia, B., Fallah, H., & Niknejad, Y. (2015). Energy efficiency and economic analysis of winter caltivation (lettuce, bersim clover, broad bean) in Mazandaran province of Iran. Biological Forum, 7(1): 1452-1460.
  • Restuccia, G., Marchese, M., Mauromicale, G., Restuccia, A., & Battaglia M. (2002). Yield and fruit quality of tomato grown in greenhouse with saline irrigation water. Acta-Horticulturae, 614(2): 699-704.
  • Rezvani Moghaddam, P., Feizi, H., & Mondani, F. (2011). Evaluation of tomato production systems in terms of energy use efficiency and economical analysis in Iran. Not Sci Biol, 3(4): 58-65.
  • Sabaghi, M.A., & Masihi, S. (2014). Examination of relationship between energy of consumption inputs and performance of tomato crops in cultivation under plastic in Dezful city. Indian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Life Sciences, 4: 383-389.
  • Sami, M., & Reyhani, H. (2015). Environmental assessment of cucumber farming using energy and greenhouse gas emission indexes. IIOAB Journal, 6(5): 15-21.
  • Sepat, N.K., Sepat, S.R., Sepat, S., & Kumar, A. (2013). Energy use efficiency and cost analysis of tomato under greenhouse and open field production system at Nubra valley of Jammu and Kashmir. International Journal of Environmental Sciences, 3(4): 1233-1241.
  • Sevgican, A., Tüzel, Y., Gül, A., & Eltez, R.Z. (1990). Türkiye’de örtü altı yetiştiriciliği. V. Türkiye Ziraat Mühendisleri Teknik Kongresi, 17-21 Ocak 1990, Ankara, Bildiriler Kitabı (II) s: 679-707.
  • Shamsabadi, H., Abedi, M., Ahmad, D., & Taheri-Rad, A. (2017). Comparison of energy consumption and greenhouse gas emission footprint caused by agricultural products in greenhouses and open fields in Iran. Energy Equipment and Systems, 5(2): 157-163.
  • Singh, J.M. (2002). On farm energy use pattern in different cropping systems in Haryana, India. MSc Thesis, International Institute of Management University of Flensburg. Sustainable Energy Systems and Management, Germany.
  • Taki, M., Ajabshirchi, Y., Mobtaker, H.G., & Abdi, R. (2012). Energy consumption, input-output relationship and cost analysis for greenhouse productions in Esfahan province of Iran. American Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 2(3): 485-501.
  • Taki, M., Abdi, R., Akbarpour, M., & Mobtaker, H.G. (2013). Energy inputs-yield relationship and sensivity analysis for tomato greenhouse production in Iran. CIGR Journal, 15(1): 59-67. Tülücü, K. (2003). Özel Bitkilerin Sulanması. Çukurova Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Tarımsal Yapılar ve Sulama Bölümü. Genel Yayın No: 254, Adana.
  • Ul, M.A. (2007). Su kullanım bilinci ve organik tarım. Bahçeşehir Üniversitesi Organik Tarım Kongresi, 19-20 Ekim 2007, İstanbul/Türkiye, s:113-125.
  • Yaldız, O., Öztürk, H.H., Zeren, Y., & Başçetinçelik, A. (1993). Energy usage in production of field crops in Turkey. 5th International Congress on Mechanization and Energy in Agriculture. 11-14 October 1993, Kuşadası/Turkey, p: 527-536.
  • Yaylalı, İ.K. (2007). Değişik tuz konsantrasyonuna sahip farklı sulama suyu uygulamalarının domateste verim ve kalite üzerine etkileri. Doktora Tezi, Selçuk Üniversitesi, Konya.
  • Yelmen, B., Şahin, H.H., & Çakır, M.T. (2019). Energy efficiency and economic analysis in tomato production: a case study of Mersın province in the Mediterranean region. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 17(4): 7371-7379.
  • Yılmaz, İ., Özalp, A., & Aydoğmuş, F. (2010). Antalya ili bodur elma üretiminde enerji kullanım etkinliğinin belirlenmesi: Elmalı ilçesi örneği. Akdeniz Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 23(2): 93-97.
  • Yousefi, M., Darijani, F., & Jahangiri, A.A. ( 2012). Comparing energy flow of greenhouse and open-field cucumber production systems in Iran. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 7(4): 624-628.

Effect of Irrigation Waters in Different Salinity Levels on Crop Yield and Energy Use in Greenhouse Tomato Production in Turkey: A Case Study in Kırklareli Province

Year 2020, , 123 - 133, 01.12.2020
https://doi.org/10.16882/hortis.810011

Abstract

This study was carried out in a quonset type plastic covered unheated greenhouse on the lands of Atatürk Soil Water and Agricultural Meteorology Institute in Kırklareli, Turkey. In the study, the effect of different salinity and irrigation water levels which were applied to tomato plant, irrigated by drip irrigation in greenhouse, on yield and energy use efficiency was evaluated and the optimum irrigation application was determined. In the study, ‘Swanson F1’ type tomato was grown as plant material. The trial was carried out on 36 parcels with three repetitions according to split plots trial design and four different irrigation water salinity levels were on main plots and three irrigation levels were on sub plots. The best result was obtained from T1S2 subject in terms of yield and energy use efficiency. The average yield was determined as 109060 kg ha-1 and energy output/input ratio, energy productivity and specific energy were found as 1.51, 1.89 kg MJ-1 and 0.53 MJ kg-1 in T1S2 subject, respectively. It was concluded that the optimum method should be on low salinity level and the irrigation water application should be on the level in order to bring the current moisture level to the field capacity.

References

  • Abdel Gawad, G., Arslan, A., Gaihbe, A., & Kadouri F. (2005). The effects of saline irrigation water management and salt tolerant tomato varieties on sustainable production of tomato in Syria (1999-2002). Agricultural Water Management, 78(1-2): 39-53.
  • Anonymous (2018a). http://bahcebitkileri.cu.edu.tr/upload/nturemis/turkiyeortualti.pdf (Data accessed April 25, 2018).
  • Anonymous (2018b). www.tarim.gov.tr (Date accessed April 25, 2018).
  • Atay, A.N. (2006). Harran ovası koşullarında damla sulama sistemi ile sulanan biberin tuza dayanımının belirlenmesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Harran Üniversitesi, Şanlıurfa.
  • Baran, M.F., & Gökdoğan, O. (2014). Karpuz ve kavun yetiştiriciliğinde enerji girdi-çıktı analizi: Kırklareli ili örneği. Anadolu Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 29(3): 217-224.
  • Baran, M.F., Oğuz, H.İ., & Gökdoğan, O. (2016). Determining the energy usage efficiency of walnut (Juglans Regia L.) cultivation in Turkey. Erwerbs-Obstbau, 59(1):77-82.
  • Bilalis, D., Kamariari, P.E., Karkanis, A., Efthimiadou, A., Zorpas, A., & Kakabouki, I. (2013). Energy inputs, output and productivity in organic and conventional maize and tomato production, under Mediterranean conditions. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici, 41(1): 190-194.
  • Cuartero, J., & Fernandez-Munoz, R. (1999). Tomato and salinity. Scientia Horticulture, 78: 83-125.
  • Çanakçı, M., & Akıncı, I. (2006). Energy use pattern analyses of greenhouse vegetable production. Energy, 31: 1243–1256.
  • Çanakçı, M., Topakçı, M., Akıncı, İ., & Özmerzi, A. (2005). Energy use pattern of some field crops and vegetable production: case study for Antalya region, Turkey. Energy and Conversion Management, 46(4): 655–666.
  • Çetin, B., & Vardar, A. (2008). An economic analysis of energy requirements and input costs for tomato production in Turkey. Renewable Energy, 33(3): 428-433.
  • Darijani, F., Veisi, H., Khoshbakht, K., Liaghati, H., & Alipour, A. (2012). An input-output energy analysis in intensive agro-ecosystems: a case study of greenhouse cucumber production in Varamin county of Tehran province, Iran. Environmental Sciences, 10(1): 79-90.
  • De, D., Singh, S., & Chandra, H. (2001) Technological impact on energy consumption in rain fed soybean cultivation in Madhya Pradesh. Applied Energy, 70: 193–213.
  • Dimitrijević, A., Đević, M., Blažin, S., & Blažin, D. (2010). Energy efficiency of the lettuce greenhouse production. http://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID= RS2011000353 (Data accessed: November 25, 2019)
  • Dimitrijević, A., Blažin, S., Blažin, D., & Ponjican, O. (2015). Energy efficiency of the tomato open field and greenhouse production system. Journal on Processing and Energy in Agriculture, 19(3): 132-135. Ekinci, K., Akbolat, D., Demircan, V., & Ekinci, C. (2005). Isparta ili elma üretiminde enerji kullanım etkinliğinin belirlenmesi. 3. Yenilenebilir Enerji Kaynakları Sempozyumu, 19-21 Ekim 2005, Mersin.
  • Flowers, T.J., Galal, H.K., & Bromham, L. (2010). Evolution of halophytes: multiple origins of salt tolerance in land plants. Functional Plant Biology, 37:604–612.
  • Hatırlı, S.A., Özkan, B., & Fert, C. (2006). Energy inputs and crop yield relationship in greenhouse tomato production. Renewable Energy, 31: 427-438.
  • İbrahim, H.Y. (2011). Energy use pattern in vegetable production under fadama in North Central Nigeria. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems, 14(2011): 1019-1024.
  • Jadidi, M.R., Sabuni, M.S., Homayounifar, M., & Mohammadi, A. (2012). Assessment of energy use pattern for tomato production in Iran: A case study from the Marand region. Research in Agricultural Engineering, 58(2): 50-56.
  • Kesmez, G.D. (2003). Tuzluluk koşullarında domateste suya dayanıma, su kullanıma ve vejetatif gelişmeye etkisi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi, Ankara.
  • Kuswardhani, N., Soni, P., & Shivakoti, G.P. (2013). Comparative energy input-output and financial analyses of greenhouse and open field vegetables production in West Java, Indonesia. Energy, 53(2013): 83-92.
  • Lopez, M.V., & Satti, S.M.E. (1996). Calcium and potassium-enhanced growth and yield of tomato under sodium chloride stress. Plant Science, 114(1): 19-27.
  • Maas, E.V., & Grattan, S.R. (1999). Crop Yields as Affected by Salinity. pp: 55-108. In: Agricultural Drainage. Chapter: Crop Yields as Affected by Salinity. Publisher: American Society of Agronomy. Editors: R. W. Skaggs and J. van Schilfgaarde.
  • Mandal, K.G., Saha, K.P., Gosh, P.L., Hati, K.M. & Bandyopadhyay, K.K. (2002). Bioenergy and economic analyses of soybean based crop production systems in central India. Biomass & Bioenergy, 23: 337–345.
  • Mihov, M., & Antonova, G. (2009). Energy assessment of monoculture and intercropping growing systems of broccoli. Proceedings of International Conference “Soil tillage and ecology”, 1-5 September 2009, Albena/ Bulgaria, p: 190-195.
  • Mihov, M., & Tringovska, I. (2010). Energy efficiency improvement of greenhouse tomato production by applying new biofertilizers. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 16(4): 454-458.
  • Mirasi, A., Samadi, M., & Rabiee, A.H. (2015). An analytical method to survey the energy input-output and emissions of greenhouse gases from wheat and tomato farms in Iran. Biological Forum, 7(1): 52-58.
  • Mohammadi, A., & Omid, M. (2010). Economical analysis and relation between energy inputs and yield of greenhouse cucumber production in Iran. Applied Energy, 87(1):191-196.
  • Mohammadi, A., Tabatabaeefar, A., Shahin, S., Rafiee, S., & Keyhani, A. (2008). Energy use and economical analysis of potato production in Iran a case study: Ardabil province. Energy Conversion and Management, 49(12): 3566–3570.
  • Monjezi, N., Sheikhdavoodi, M.J., & Taki, M. (2011). Energy use pattern and optimization of energy consumption for greenhouse cucumber production in Iran using data envelopment analysis (DEA). Modern Applied Science, 5(6): 139-151.
  • Özkan, B., Kürklü, A., & Akçaöz, H. (2004). An input-output energy analysis in greenhouse vegetable production: a case study for Antalya region of Turkey. Biomass Bioenergy, 26(1): 189-195.
  • Pahlavan, R., Omid, M., & Akram, A. (2011). Modeling and sensivity analysis of energy inputs for greenhouse cucumber production. Journal of Agricultural Technology, 7(6): 1509-1521.
  • Pahlavan, R., Omid, M., & Akram, A. (2012). The relationship between energy inputs and crop yield in greenhouse basil production. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 14: 1243-1253.
  • Pascale, S., Angelino, G., Graziani, G., Maggio, A., & Pascale, S. (2003). Effect of salt stress on water relations and antioxidant activity in tomato, Acta-Horticulturae, 613: 39-46.
  • Pashaee, F., Rahmati, M.H., & Pashaee, P. (2008). Study and determination of energy consumption to produce tomato in the greenhouse. The 5th National Conference on Agricultural Machinery Engineering and Mechanization, 27-28 August 2008, Mashhad/Iran.
  • Rafiee, S., Seyed, H., Mousavi, A., & Ali, M. (2010). Modeling and sensivity analysis of energy inputs for apple production in Iran. Energy, 35: 3301-3306.
  • Razavinia, B., Fallah, H., & Niknejad, Y. (2015). Energy efficiency and economic analysis of winter caltivation (lettuce, bersim clover, broad bean) in Mazandaran province of Iran. Biological Forum, 7(1): 1452-1460.
  • Restuccia, G., Marchese, M., Mauromicale, G., Restuccia, A., & Battaglia M. (2002). Yield and fruit quality of tomato grown in greenhouse with saline irrigation water. Acta-Horticulturae, 614(2): 699-704.
  • Rezvani Moghaddam, P., Feizi, H., & Mondani, F. (2011). Evaluation of tomato production systems in terms of energy use efficiency and economical analysis in Iran. Not Sci Biol, 3(4): 58-65.
  • Sabaghi, M.A., & Masihi, S. (2014). Examination of relationship between energy of consumption inputs and performance of tomato crops in cultivation under plastic in Dezful city. Indian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Life Sciences, 4: 383-389.
  • Sami, M., & Reyhani, H. (2015). Environmental assessment of cucumber farming using energy and greenhouse gas emission indexes. IIOAB Journal, 6(5): 15-21.
  • Sepat, N.K., Sepat, S.R., Sepat, S., & Kumar, A. (2013). Energy use efficiency and cost analysis of tomato under greenhouse and open field production system at Nubra valley of Jammu and Kashmir. International Journal of Environmental Sciences, 3(4): 1233-1241.
  • Sevgican, A., Tüzel, Y., Gül, A., & Eltez, R.Z. (1990). Türkiye’de örtü altı yetiştiriciliği. V. Türkiye Ziraat Mühendisleri Teknik Kongresi, 17-21 Ocak 1990, Ankara, Bildiriler Kitabı (II) s: 679-707.
  • Shamsabadi, H., Abedi, M., Ahmad, D., & Taheri-Rad, A. (2017). Comparison of energy consumption and greenhouse gas emission footprint caused by agricultural products in greenhouses and open fields in Iran. Energy Equipment and Systems, 5(2): 157-163.
  • Singh, J.M. (2002). On farm energy use pattern in different cropping systems in Haryana, India. MSc Thesis, International Institute of Management University of Flensburg. Sustainable Energy Systems and Management, Germany.
  • Taki, M., Ajabshirchi, Y., Mobtaker, H.G., & Abdi, R. (2012). Energy consumption, input-output relationship and cost analysis for greenhouse productions in Esfahan province of Iran. American Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 2(3): 485-501.
  • Taki, M., Abdi, R., Akbarpour, M., & Mobtaker, H.G. (2013). Energy inputs-yield relationship and sensivity analysis for tomato greenhouse production in Iran. CIGR Journal, 15(1): 59-67. Tülücü, K. (2003). Özel Bitkilerin Sulanması. Çukurova Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Tarımsal Yapılar ve Sulama Bölümü. Genel Yayın No: 254, Adana.
  • Ul, M.A. (2007). Su kullanım bilinci ve organik tarım. Bahçeşehir Üniversitesi Organik Tarım Kongresi, 19-20 Ekim 2007, İstanbul/Türkiye, s:113-125.
  • Yaldız, O., Öztürk, H.H., Zeren, Y., & Başçetinçelik, A. (1993). Energy usage in production of field crops in Turkey. 5th International Congress on Mechanization and Energy in Agriculture. 11-14 October 1993, Kuşadası/Turkey, p: 527-536.
  • Yaylalı, İ.K. (2007). Değişik tuz konsantrasyonuna sahip farklı sulama suyu uygulamalarının domateste verim ve kalite üzerine etkileri. Doktora Tezi, Selçuk Üniversitesi, Konya.
  • Yelmen, B., Şahin, H.H., & Çakır, M.T. (2019). Energy efficiency and economic analysis in tomato production: a case study of Mersın province in the Mediterranean region. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 17(4): 7371-7379.
  • Yılmaz, İ., Özalp, A., & Aydoğmuş, F. (2010). Antalya ili bodur elma üretiminde enerji kullanım etkinliğinin belirlenmesi: Elmalı ilçesi örneği. Akdeniz Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 23(2): 93-97.
  • Yousefi, M., Darijani, F., & Jahangiri, A.A. ( 2012). Comparing energy flow of greenhouse and open-field cucumber production systems in Iran. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 7(4): 624-628.
There are 53 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Agricultural Engineering
Journal Section Araştırma Makalesi
Authors

Ulviye Çebi This is me 0000-0002-1587-6318

Başak Aydın This is me 0000-0002-5047-7654

Selçuk Özer This is me 0000-0002-6055-4377

Ozan Öztürk This is me 0000-0001-8329-2739

Publication Date December 1, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2020

Cite

APA Çebi, U., Aydın, B., Özer, S., Öztürk, O. (2020). Effect of Irrigation Waters in Different Salinity Levels on Crop Yield and Energy Use in Greenhouse Tomato Production in Turkey: A Case Study in Kırklareli Province. Horticultural Studies, 37(2), 123-133. https://doi.org/10.16882/hortis.810011
AMA Çebi U, Aydın B, Özer S, Öztürk O. Effect of Irrigation Waters in Different Salinity Levels on Crop Yield and Energy Use in Greenhouse Tomato Production in Turkey: A Case Study in Kırklareli Province. HortiS. December 2020;37(2):123-133. doi:10.16882/hortis.810011
Chicago Çebi, Ulviye, Başak Aydın, Selçuk Özer, and Ozan Öztürk. “Effect of Irrigation Waters in Different Salinity Levels on Crop Yield and Energy Use in Greenhouse Tomato Production in Turkey: A Case Study in Kırklareli Province”. Horticultural Studies 37, no. 2 (December 2020): 123-33. https://doi.org/10.16882/hortis.810011.
EndNote Çebi U, Aydın B, Özer S, Öztürk O (December 1, 2020) Effect of Irrigation Waters in Different Salinity Levels on Crop Yield and Energy Use in Greenhouse Tomato Production in Turkey: A Case Study in Kırklareli Province. Horticultural Studies 37 2 123–133.
IEEE U. Çebi, B. Aydın, S. Özer, and O. Öztürk, “Effect of Irrigation Waters in Different Salinity Levels on Crop Yield and Energy Use in Greenhouse Tomato Production in Turkey: A Case Study in Kırklareli Province”, HortiS, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 123–133, 2020, doi: 10.16882/hortis.810011.
ISNAD Çebi, Ulviye et al. “Effect of Irrigation Waters in Different Salinity Levels on Crop Yield and Energy Use in Greenhouse Tomato Production in Turkey: A Case Study in Kırklareli Province”. Horticultural Studies 37/2 (December 2020), 123-133. https://doi.org/10.16882/hortis.810011.
JAMA Çebi U, Aydın B, Özer S, Öztürk O. Effect of Irrigation Waters in Different Salinity Levels on Crop Yield and Energy Use in Greenhouse Tomato Production in Turkey: A Case Study in Kırklareli Province. HortiS. 2020;37:123–133.
MLA Çebi, Ulviye et al. “Effect of Irrigation Waters in Different Salinity Levels on Crop Yield and Energy Use in Greenhouse Tomato Production in Turkey: A Case Study in Kırklareli Province”. Horticultural Studies, vol. 37, no. 2, 2020, pp. 123-3, doi:10.16882/hortis.810011.
Vancouver Çebi U, Aydın B, Özer S, Öztürk O. Effect of Irrigation Waters in Different Salinity Levels on Crop Yield and Energy Use in Greenhouse Tomato Production in Turkey: A Case Study in Kırklareli Province. HortiS. 2020;37(2):123-3.