Prosodic and Analogical Effects in Phonetic Realization in Turkish Noun-Noun Compounds

İpek Pınar Uzun

doi:10.32600/huefd.1159241

TR EN

Türkçede Ad-Ad Bileşiklerinin Sesbilgisel Görünümlerine ilişkin Bürünsel ve Analojik Etkiler

Öz

Türkçede bileşiklerin sesbilgisel özellikleri üzerine yapılan bürünsel araştırmalar tipik olarak sözlüksel vurgunun bürünsel tanımlarını incelemiştir, ancak sesbilgisel özelliklere ilişkin bulgular görece daha az sayıdadır. Bu çalışmada, Türkçede bileşik-öbek ile varolan-uydurma bileşiklerin akustik özelliklerini ölçülerek, Türkçede ad-ad bileşiklerindeki sözlüksel vurgunun sesbilgisel görünümleri araştırılmaktadır. Deney 1’de ad-ad bileşikleri ve öbeksel karşıtlıkları ([da.ná.bur.nu] ve [[da.ná][bur.nú]]) kullanılmış, Deney 2’de varolan ve uydurma bileşikler ([da.ná.bur.nu] ve [ke.dí.bur.nu]) akustik olarak ölçülmüştür. Bulgular, Deney 1 için bileşikleri öbeksel karşıtlarından ayıran belirgin bir sesbilgisel eğilim göstermiştir. Model yoğunluk, süre, perde değerleri, konum (sol ve sağ) ve bürünsel tür (bileşik ve öbek) arasında güçlü bir etkileşim ortaya koymuştur. Deney 2’de uydurma bileşikler dilin sözlüksel bir parçası olmamasına karşın, uydurma bileşiklerden elde edilen bulgular, varolan bileşiklerin perde, yoğunluk ve sürelerinin varolan bileşiklere benzer vurgu atamasını taşıdığını ortaya koymuştur. Konum (sol ve sağ) ve sözcük türü (varolan ve uydurma) etkenlerinin akustik özelliklerine ilişkin benzer etkileşim etkileri gözlenmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular, Türkçede bileşik vurgusunun sesbilgisel görünümlerinin ortaya konulmasına katkı sağlayabilmekte ve ileri araştırmalara zemin hazırlamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

bileşik , öbek , sözlüksel , uydurma , akustik , vurgu

Prosodic and Analogical Effects in Phonetic Realization in Turkish Noun-Noun Compounds

Abstract

Previous studies on phonetic realization of compounds in Turkish have typically examined prosodic accounts of lexical stress; however, evidence for phonetic features is relatively sparse. This study investigates phonetic implementation of lexical stress in Turkish noun-noun compounds by measuring acoustic correlates of compounds vs. phrases and existing vs. novel compounds. In Experiment 1, noun-noun compounds and their phrasal contrasts (e.g., [da.ná.bur.nu] ‘mole cricket’ vs. [[da.ná][bur.nú]] ‘nose of a calf’), in Experiment 2, existing and novel compounds were acoustically measured by using existing vs. novel pairs (e.g., [da.ná.bur.nu] vs. [ke.dí.bur.nu]). Results for Experiment 1 showed a clear phonetic tendency that distinguished compounds from their phrasal counterparts. The model revealed significant main effects for intensity, duration, pitch values, and a strong interaction between position (left vs. right) and prosodic type (compound vs phrase). In Experiment 2, even though novel compounds are not lexicalized parts of a language, results from novel compounds revealed a similar stress assignment on the pitch, intensity, and duration of existing compounds. Significant interaction effects were observed for acoustic correlates between position (left vs. right) and compound type (existing vs. novel). Findings obtained from this research might contribute to revealing the basic phonetic aspects of the compound stress in Turkish, and results may lay the groundwork for future research.

Keywords

Compound , phrase , existing , novel , phonetics , stress

Kaynakça

Aksan, Y., Aksan, M., Özel, S.A., Yılmazer, H., Bektaş, Y., Mersinli, Ü., Atasoy, G., & Demirhan, U.U. (2017). Turkish National Corpus (TNC). (Version 3.0.63).https://v3.tnc.org.tr
Arnaud, P.J.L. & Renner, V. (2014). English and French [NN]N lexical units: A categorical, morphological, and semantic comparison. Word Structure, 7(1),1-28.10.3366/word.2014.0054
Athanasopoulou, A., Vogel, I., & Dolatian, H. (2017). Acoustic properties of canonical and non-canonical stress in French, Turkish, Armenian, and Brazilian Portuguese. In Interspeech (pp.1398-1402).10.21437/Interspeech.2017-1514
Baayen, R.H. (2008). Analysing linguistic data. A practical introduction to statistics. Cambridge University Press.
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1-48.10.18637/jss.v067.i01
Beckman, M.E. (1986). Stress and non-stress accents. Foris Publications.
Bell, M.J. & Plag, I. (2012). Informativeness is a determinant of compound stress in English. Journal of Linguistics, 48(3),485-520.10.1017/S0022226712000199
Bell, M.J. & Plag, I. (2013). Informativity and analogy in English compound stress. Word Structure, 6(2),129-155.10.3366/WORD.2013.0042
Berg, T. (2012). The cohesiveness of English and German compounds. The Mental Lexicon, 7(1),1-33.10.1075/ml.7.1.01ber
Boersma, P. & Weenink, D. (2022). Praat:doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6.2.14, Retrieved 24 May 2022 from http://www.praat.org/

Charette, M., Göksel, A., & Şener, S. (2007). Initial stress in morphologically complex words in Turkish: The interface of prosodic structure and ‘phrase’ structure Phonological Domains; Universals and Deviations (DGfS-29) Workshop. Siegen University.
Chomsky, N. & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. Harper & Row, Inc.
Cinque, G. (1993). A null theory of phrase and compound stress. Linguistic Inquiry, 24(2), 239-297. Demircan, Ö. (1975). Türk Dilinde vurgu:Sözcük vurgusu. Türk Dili, 284.
Farnetani, E. & Torsello, C.T. & Cosi, P. (1988). English compounds versus non-compound noun phrases in discourse: An acoustic and perceptual study. Language and Speech, 31(2), 157-180.
Fry, D.B. (1958). Experiments in the perception of stress. Language and Speech, 1(2), 126-152.10.1177/002383095800100207
Gagné, C.L., & Spalding, T.L. (2006). Using conceptual combination research to better understand novel compound words. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics, 3(2), 9-16.
Giegerich, H. (2009). The English compound stress myth. Word Structure, 2(1), 1-17.10.3366/E1750124509000270
Giegerich, H.J. (1992). English phonology: An introduction. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139166126
Giegerich, H.J. (2004). Compound or phrase? English noun-plus-noun constructions and the stress criterion. English Language and Linguistics, 8, 1-24.10.1017/S1360674304001224
Göksel, A. & Haznedar, B. (2007). Remarks on Compounding in Turkish. MorboComp Project, Bologna University.
Halle, M. & Vergnaud, J.R. (1987). An essay on stress. Current Studies in Linguistics,15. MIT Press. 10.1017/S0952675700001160
Harrington, J., Beckman, M.E., Fletcher, J., & Palethorpe, S. (1998). An electropalatographic, kinematic, and acoustic analysis of supralaryngeal correlates of word-level prominence contrasts in English. In Fifth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing.https://www.isca-speech.org/archive/pdfs/icslp_1998/harrington98_icslp.pdf
Inkelas, S. & Orgun, C.O. (1998). Level (non)ordering in recursive morphology: Evidence from Turkish. In S.G. Lapointe, D.K. Brentari & P.M. Farrell (eds.) Morphology and its relation to phonology and syntax (pp.360-410). CSLI.
Inkelas, S., & Orgun, C.O. (2003). Turkish stress: a review. Phonology, 20(1), 139-161.
Johanson, L. (2021). Turkic. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781139016704
Kabak, B. & Revithiadou, A. (2007). Prosodic structure above the phonological word. Phonological Domains; Universals and Deviations (DGfS-29) Workshop. Siegen University.
Kabak, B. & Vogel, I. (2001). The phonological word and stress assignment in Turkish. Phonology, 18, 315-260. Cambridge University Press.https://www.jstor.org/stable/4420202
Kabak, B. & Vogel, I. (2005). Irregular Stress in Turkish. Word-level accentual system of Turkish Project.
Kamali, B. & İkizoğlu, D. (2012). Against compound stress in Turkish [Conference presentation]. 16th International Conference on Turkish Linguistics, Middle East Technical University.
Kassambara, A. (2020). ‘ggplot2’ based publication ready plots [R package ggpubr version 0.4.0].Retrieved from https://github.com/kassambara/ggpubr/issues
Konrot, A. (1981). A new phoneme of ‘voiced velar stop erosion’: Phonetic explanation for the phonological status of the so-called ‘soft g’ in Turkish. University of Essex Department of Language and Linguistics Occasional Papers 34, 12-24.
Kornfilt, J. (1997). Turkish. Routledge.
Kunduracı, A. (2013). Turkish noun-noun compounds: A process-based paradigmatic account. [PhD Dissertation]. University of Calgary.
Kunduracı, A. (2017). Process morphology in concatenation. N. Büyükkantarcıoğlu, E. Yarar, & I. Özyıldırım (Eds), 45. Yıl Yazıları (pp. 255-278). Hacettepe Üniversitesi Yayınevi.
Kunduracı, A. (2019). The paradigmatic aspect of compounding and derivation. Journal of Linguistics, 55(3), 1-47. 10.1017/S0022226718000518
Kunter, G. & Plag, I. (2007). What is compound stress? [Conference presentation]. International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, University of Saarbrücken.
Kunter, G. (2011). Compound stress in English: The phonetics and phonology of prosodic prominence. Walter de Gruyter.
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P.B., & Christensen, R.H.B. (2017). lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1–26.10.18637/jss.v082.i13
Ladd, D.R. (1984). English compound stress. In D. Gibbon & H. Richter (Eds.), Intonation, accent, and rhythm: Studies in discourse phonology (pp. 253-267). Walter de Gruyter.
Ladd, D.R. (1996). Intonational phonology. Cambridge University Press.
Lees, R. (1961). The phonology of Modern Standard Turkish. Indiana University.
Lenth, R.V. (2016). Least-Squares Means: The R Package lsmeans. Journal of Statistical Software, 69(1), 1-33.10.18637/jss.v069.i01
Levi, S.V. (2005). Acoustic correlates of lexical accent in Turkish. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 35(1), 73-97.10.1017/S0025100305001921
Lewis, G. (1967). Turkish grammar. Oxford University Press.
Liberman, M. & Prince, A. (1977). On stress and linguistic rhythm. Linguistic Inquiry, 8(2), 249-336.http://www.jstor.org/stable/4177987
Morrill, T. (2012). Acoustic correlates of stress in English adjective–noun compounds. Language and speech, 55(2), 167-201.10.1177/0023830911417251
Neef, M. (2009). IE, Germanic: German. In R. Lieber & P. Štekauer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of compounding (pp.386-399). Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199695720.013.0020
Nespor, M., & Vogel, I. (1986). Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Foris.10.1017/S0952675700002219
Nguyên, T.A. & Ingram, J.C.L. (2007). Acoustic and perceptual cues for compound-phrasal in Vietnamese. Journal of Acoustic Society of America, 122(3),1746-1757.10.1121/1.2747169
Olsen, S. (2000). Compounding and stress in English: A closer look at the boundary between morphology and syntax. Linguistische Berichte, 181, 55-70.
Öztürk, Ö. (2005). Modeling phoneme durations and fundamental frequency contours in Turkish speech. [PhD Dissertation]. Middle East Technical University.
Plag, I. & Kunter, G. & Lappe, S. (2007). Testing hypotheses about compound stress assignment in English: A corpus-based investigation. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 3(2), 199-232.10.1515/CLLT.2007.012
Plag, I. & Kunter, G. & Schramm, M. (2011). Acoustic correlates of primary and secondary stress in North American English. Journal of Phonetics, 39(3), 362-374.10.1016/j.wocn.2011.03.004
Plag, I. & Kunter, G. (2010). Constituent family size and compound stress assignment in English. In S. Olsen (ed.), New impulses in word-formation (Linguistische Berichte, Sonderheft 17), 349-382. Buske.
Plag, I. (2006). The variability of compound stress in English: Structural, semantic, and analogical factors. English Language and Linguistics, 10(1), 143-172.10.1017/S1360674306001821
Plag, I. (2009). Word Formation in English. (pp. 44-51). Cambridge University Press. Reprinted in P. Griffiths, A. Bloomer, & A. Merrison (eds.) Introducing Language in Use:A reader. Routledge. 10.4000/lexis.4532
Plag, I. (2010). Compound stress assignment by analogy: The constituent family bias. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, 29, 243-282.10.1515/zfsw.2010.009
R Core Team. (2022). R:A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/
Ryan, K. (2005). Grid-maker [Praat script]. Retrieved from http://phonetics.linguistics.ucla.edu/facilities/acoustic/grid-maker.praat
Schlechtweg, M. (2018). Memorization and the Compound-Phrase Distinction. In Memorization and the Compound-Phrase Distinction. De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110570861
Schlücker, B. & Plag, I. (2011). Compound or phrase? Analogy in naming. Lingua, 121(9), 1539-1551.10.1016/j.lingua.2011.04.005
Schlücker, B. (2013). The semantics of lexical modification: Meaning and meaning relations in German A+N compounds. In P. ten Hacken & C. Thomas (eds.), The semantics of word formation and lexicalization (pp. 121-139). Edinburgh University Press.10.3366/edinburgh/9780748689606.001.0001
Schmerling, S.F. (1971). A stress mess. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences, 1, 52-66.http://las.sagepub.com/content/56/4/529
Selkirk, E. (1984). Phonology and syntax: The relation between sound and structure. MIT Press.
Sezer, E. (1983). On non-final stress in Turkish. Journal of Turkish Studies, 5, 61-69.
Swift, L.B. (1963). A reference grammar of Modern Turkish. Uralic and Altaic series (Vol. 19). Indiana University Publications.
Van Goethem, K. (2009). Choosing between A+N compounds and lexicalized A+N phrases: The position of French in comparison to Germanic languages. Word Structure, 2(2), 241-253.10.3366/E1750124509000439
Vogel, I., & Raimy, E. (2002). The acquisition of compound vs. phrasal stress: the role of prosodic constituents. Journal of Child Language, 29(2), 225-250.10.1017/S0305000902005020
Wickham, H. (2016). ggplot2:Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer. ISBN:978-3-319-24277-4,https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org
Xu, Y. (2013). ProsodyPro—A Tool for Large-scale Systematic Prosody Analysis of continuous prosodic events[Praat script]. Retrieved from http://www.homepages.ucl.ac.uk/~uclyyix/ProsodyPro/

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Dilbilim

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

İpek Pınar Uzun ^*
0000-0003-3103-0758
Türkiye

Erken Görünüm Tarihi

27 Aralık 2023

Yayımlanma Tarihi

27 Aralık 2023

Gönderilme Tarihi

28 Eylül 2022

Kabul Tarihi

21 Aralık 2022

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2023 Cilt: 40 Sayı: 2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.32600/huefd.1159241

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA55EZ65GC

APA

Uzun, İ. P. (2023). Prosodic and Analogical Effects in Phonetic Realization in Turkish Noun-Noun Compounds. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 40(2), 347-368. https://doi.org/10.32600/huefd.1159241

Bu eser Creative Commons Atıf 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.

Türkçede Ad-Ad Bileşiklerinin Sesbilgisel Görünümlerine ilişkin Bürünsel ve Analojik Etkiler

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Prosodic and Analogical Effects in Phonetic Realization in Turkish Noun-Noun Compounds

Abstract

Keywords

Kaynakça

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Konular

Bölüm

Yazarlar

Erken Görünüm Tarihi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

Gönderilme Tarihi

Kabul Tarihi

Yayımlandığı Sayı

DOI

IZ

Kaynak Göster