EVALUATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PHYSICAL ACTIVITY LEVEL AND EXECUTIVE FUNCTIONS IN UNIVERSITY STUDENTS

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between physical actvity level and executive functions in university students. Methods: Ninety-three (18-25 years of age) (Female:64; Male:29) university students studying at XXXXXXXXX XXXXX University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation were included in the study. The participants’ physical activity levels were assessed using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (IPAQ-SF), and their executive functions were evaluated using the Stroop Test-TBAG form. Results: In this study, 32.3% of participants were found to be vey active, 30.1% were physically inactive, and 37.6% were minimally active. No statistically significant relationship was found between university students’ total IPAQ-SF scores and the Stroop Test-TBAG form scores. Discussion: In this study, no relationship was obtained between physical activity level and executive functions. Further research is needed using objective methods to understand the possible interaction between physical activity and executive functions in university students. Investigating the effect of physical activity on executive functions can contribute to raising awareness of physical activity in university students, healthy aging, and success in academic life.

Keywords

• executive function
• physical activity
• university students

References

1. 1. Bull FC, Al-Ansari SS, Biddle S, Borodulin K, Buman MP, Cardon G, et al. World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. BJSM. 2020;54(24):1451-62.
2. 2. Guthold R, Stevens GA, Riley LM, Bull FC. Worldwide trends in insufficient physical activity from 2001 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 358 population-based surveys with 1· 9 million participants. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6(10):e1077-e86.
3. 3. Thivel D, Tremblay A, Genin PM, Panahi S, Rivière D, Duclos M. Physical activity, inactivity, and sedentary behaviors: definitions and implications in occupational health. Front Public Health. 2018;6:288.
4. 4. Hallal PC, Victora CG, Azevedo MR, Wells JC. Adolescent physical activity and health: a systematic review. Sports Medicine. 2006;36:1019-30.
5. 5. Senısık S. The relation between physical activity and mental health: psychological effects of exercise-biochemical, physiological and psychosocial mechanisms. Turkiye Klinikleri J Sports Med-Special Topics. 2016;2:1-7.
6. 6. Ströhle A. Physical activity, exercise, depression and anxiety disorders. J Neural Transm. 2009;116:777-84.
7. 7. Sewell KR, Erickson KI, Rainey-Smith SR, Peiffer JJ, Sohrabi HR, Brown BM. Relationships between physical activity, sleep and cognitive function: A narrative review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021;130:369-78.
8. 8. Prehn K, Lesemann A, Krey G, Witte AV, Köbe T, Grittner U, et al. Using resting-state fMRI to assess the effect of aerobic exercise on functional connectivity of the DLPFC in older overweight adults. Brain and Cognition. 2019;131:34-44.

9. 9. Cox EP, O’Dwyer N, Cook R, Vetter M, Cheng HL, Rooney K, et al. Relationship between physical activity and cognitive function in apparently healthy young to middle-aged adults: A systematic review. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport. 2016;19(8):616-28.
10. 10. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A-G, Buchner A. G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39(2):175-91.
11. 11. Muntaner-Mas A, Mazzoli E, Abbott G, Mavilidi MF, Galmes-Panades AM. Do physical fitness and executive function mediate the relationship between physical activity and academic achievement? An examination using structural equation modelling. Children. 2022;9(6):823.
12. 12. Karaca A, Turnagol HH. Çalışan bireylerde üç farkli fiziksel aktivite anketinin güvenirliği ve geçerliği. Spor Bilimleri Dergisi. 2007;18(2):68-84.
13. 13. Saglam M, Arikan H, Savci S, Inal-Ince D, Bosnak-Guclu M, Karabulut E, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: reliability and validity of the Turkish version. Percept Mot Skills. 2010;111(1):278-84.
14. 14. Karakaş S, Erdoğan E, Sak L, Soysal A, Ulusoy T, Ulusoy İY, et al. Stroop test TBAG form: standardisation for Turkish culture, reliability and validity. J Clin Psy. 1999;2(2):75-88.
15. 15. Karakaş S. BİLNOT Nöropsikolojik test bataryası: Stroop Testi TBAG formu araştırma ve geliştirme çalışmaları ve kullanım kılavuzu. Ankara: Ayrıntı. 2011.
16. 16. Yüksel Y, Aydogmus M, Kayişoğlu N, Revan S. Determination of physical activity levels of Karabük University students. TJSE. 2021;23(2):253-8.
17. 17. Demirer İ, Erol S. The relationships between university students’ physical activity levels, insomnia and psychological well-being. Journal of Psychiatric Nursing. 2020;11(3):201-11.
18. 18. Savcı FDS, Öztürk UFM, Arıkan FDH. Üniversite ögrencilerinin fiziksel aktivite düzeyleri. Türk Kardiyoloji Dernegi Arşivi. 2006;34(3):166-72.
19. 19. İlaslan E, Taylan S, Özkan İ, Adıbelli D. Investigation of physical activity levels and associated factors of university students in a district. Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Internal Medicine. 2020;5(1).
20. 20. Ferreira Silva RM, Mendonça CR, Azevedo VD, Raoof Memon A, Noll PRES, Noll M. Barriers to high school and university students’ physical activity: A systematic review. PloS one. 2022;17(4):e0265913.
21. 21 Kljajević V, Stanković M, Đorđević D, Trkulja-Petković D, Jovanović R, Plazibat K, et al. Physical activity and physical fitness among university students—A systematic review. Int J Environ Res and Public Health. 2021;19(1):158.
22. 22. Pengpid S, Peltzer K, Kassean HK, Tsala Tsala JP, Sychareun V, Müller-Riemenschneider F. Physical inactivity and associated factors among university students in 23 low-, middle-and high-income countries. Int J Public Health. 2015;60:539-49.
23. 23. Simona FR, Liliana & Vanvu, G.I.. (2015). The Level of Physical Activity of University Students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 197. 1454-1457. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.094.
24. 24. Seo Y-J, Ha Y. Gender differences in predictors of physical activity among Korean college students based on the health promotion model. Asian Pac Isl Nurs J. 2019;4(1):1.
25. 25. Friedman NP, Miyake A. Unity and diversity of executive functions: Individual differences as a window on cognitive structure. Cortex. 2017;86:186-204.
26. 26. Daly M, McMinn D, Allan JL. A bidirectional relationship between physical activity and executive function in older adults. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015;8:1044.
27. 27. Barenberg J, Berse T, Dutke S. Executive functions in learning processes: do they benefit from physical activity? Educ Res Rev. 2011;6(3):208-22.
28. 28. Bidzan-Bluma I, Lipowska M. Physical activity and cognitive functioning of children: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(4):800.
29. 29. Salas-Gomez D, Fernandez-Gorgojo M, Pozueta A, Diaz-Ceballos I, Lamarain M, Perez C, et al. Physical activity is associated with better executive function in university students. Front Hum Neurosci. 2020;14:11.
30. 30. Ho S, Gooderham GK, Handy TC. Self-reported free-living physical activity and executive control in young adults. PloS one. 2018;13(12):e0209616.
31. 31. Tekkuş B. Genç yetişkinlerde fiziksel aktivite ve bilişsel performans arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches. 2021;18(42):5699-714.