Research Article

Evaluation of the Appropriateness of Antimicrobial Drug Dosages in Intensive Care Unit Patients

Volume: 44 Number: 1 March 1, 2024
EN TR

Evaluation of the Appropriateness of Antimicrobial Drug Dosages in Intensive Care Unit Patients

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the factors that required dose adjustments of antimicrobial drugs in intensive care unit (ICU) patients and to identify the drugs that required the most dose adjustments. The current prospective study was conducted in the reanimation ICU with 26-bed capacity of a university-affiliated hospital from September to December 2022. Two clinical pharmacists on duty examined patients’ antimicrobial drug dosages daily. The acceptance status of the recommendations and the patients’ demographic information were recorded. The study involved 133 ICU patients, and antimicrobial drug recommendations were made for 48 patients, 31 (64.6%) of whom were male. The median (IQR) age of the 48 patients was 67 (54–77). The count of recommendations was 94, and the acceptance rate was 100%. The recommendation rates were as follows: 71.3% for renal function, 11.7% for presence of continuous renal replacement therapy, 10.6% for indication, 4.3% for body weight, and 2.1% for loading dose. The top 3 drugs for which recommendations were made the most were colistin (21.3%), meropenem (18.1%), and piperacillin-tazobactam (12.8%). The most troublesome drug was colistin, which is frequently used to treat Acinetobacter pneumonia. Clinical pharmacist and physician collaboration may help rationalize ICU antimicrobial drug use.

Keywords

References

  1. 1. Versporten A, Zarb P, Caniaux I, Gros M-F, Drapier N, Miller M, et al. Antimicrobial consumption and resistance in adult hospital inpatients in 53 countries: Results of an internet-based global point prevalence survey. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6(6):e619-e29. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2214-109x(18)30186-4
  2. 2. Onufrak NJ, Forrest A, Gonzalez D. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic principles of anti-infective dosing. Clin Ther. 2016;38(9):1930-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.06.015
  3. 3. Rawson TM, Wilson RC, O’Hare D, Herrero P, Kambugu A, Lamorde M, et al. Optimizing antimicrobial use: Challenges, advances and opportunities. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2021;19(12):747-58. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-021-00578-9
  4. 4. Chai MG, Cotta MO, Abdul-Aziz MH, Roberts JA. What Are the current approaches to optimising antimicrobial dosing in the intensive care unit? Pharmaceutics. 2020;12(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics12070638
  5. 5. Timsit J-F, Bassetti M, Cremer O, Daikos G, De Waele J, Kallil A, et al. Rationalizing antimicrobial therapy in the ICU: A narrative review. Intensive Care Med. 2019;45(2):172-89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-019-05520-5
  6. 6. Roberts JA, Joynt GM, Choi GY, Gomersall CD, Lipman J. How to optimise antimicrobial prescriptions in the intensive care unit: principles of individualised dosing using pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2012;39(3):187-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2011.11.002
  7. 7. De Pascale G, Fortuna S, Tumbarello M, Cutuli SL, Vallecoccia M, Spanu T, et al. Linezolid plasma and intrapulmonary concentrations in critically ill obese patients with ventilatorassociated pneumonia: Intermittent vs continuous administration. Intensive Care Med. 2015;41(1):103-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-014-3550-y
  8. 8. Dulhunty JM, Roberts JA, Davis JS, Webb SA, Bellomo R, Gomersall C, et al. A multicenter randomized trial of continuous versus intermittent β-lactam infusion in severe sepsis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;192(11):1298-305. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201505-0857OC

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Pharmacology and Pharmaceutical Sciences

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

March 1, 2024

Submission Date

May 25, 2023

Acceptance Date

August 15, 2023

Published in Issue

Year 2024 Volume: 44 Number: 1

APA
Memiş, H., Çakır, A., Özdemir, N., & Gün, Z. Ü. (2024). Evaluation of the Appropriateness of Antimicrobial Drug Dosages in Intensive Care Unit Patients. Hacettepe University Journal of the Faculty of Pharmacy, 44(1), 38-45. https://doi.org/10.52794/hujpharm.1302724
AMA
1.Memiş H, Çakır A, Özdemir N, Gün ZÜ. Evaluation of the Appropriateness of Antimicrobial Drug Dosages in Intensive Care Unit Patients. HUJPHARM. 2024;44(1):38-45. doi:10.52794/hujpharm.1302724
Chicago
Memiş, Hasan, Ahmet Çakır, Nesligül Özdemir, and Zeynep Ülkü Gün. 2024. “Evaluation of the Appropriateness of Antimicrobial Drug Dosages in Intensive Care Unit Patients”. Hacettepe University Journal of the Faculty of Pharmacy 44 (1): 38-45. https://doi.org/10.52794/hujpharm.1302724.
EndNote
Memiş H, Çakır A, Özdemir N, Gün ZÜ (March 1, 2024) Evaluation of the Appropriateness of Antimicrobial Drug Dosages in Intensive Care Unit Patients. Hacettepe University Journal of the Faculty of Pharmacy 44 1 38–45.
IEEE
[1]H. Memiş, A. Çakır, N. Özdemir, and Z. Ü. Gün, “Evaluation of the Appropriateness of Antimicrobial Drug Dosages in Intensive Care Unit Patients”, HUJPHARM, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 38–45, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.52794/hujpharm.1302724.
ISNAD
Memiş, Hasan - Çakır, Ahmet - Özdemir, Nesligül - Gün, Zeynep Ülkü. “Evaluation of the Appropriateness of Antimicrobial Drug Dosages in Intensive Care Unit Patients”. Hacettepe University Journal of the Faculty of Pharmacy 44/1 (March 1, 2024): 38-45. https://doi.org/10.52794/hujpharm.1302724.
JAMA
1.Memiş H, Çakır A, Özdemir N, Gün ZÜ. Evaluation of the Appropriateness of Antimicrobial Drug Dosages in Intensive Care Unit Patients. HUJPHARM. 2024;44:38–45.
MLA
Memiş, Hasan, et al. “Evaluation of the Appropriateness of Antimicrobial Drug Dosages in Intensive Care Unit Patients”. Hacettepe University Journal of the Faculty of Pharmacy, vol. 44, no. 1, Mar. 2024, pp. 38-45, doi:10.52794/hujpharm.1302724.
Vancouver
1.Hasan Memiş, Ahmet Çakır, Nesligül Özdemir, Zeynep Ülkü Gün. Evaluation of the Appropriateness of Antimicrobial Drug Dosages in Intensive Care Unit Patients. HUJPHARM. 2024 Mar. 1;44(1):38-45. doi:10.52794/hujpharm.1302724