Farmasötik Ürünlerde Tasarımla Kalite Yaklaşımı

Yıl 2013, Sayı: 2, 203 - 230, 01.06.2013

Fidan Mike Sibel Bozdağ Pehlivan Levent Öner

Öz

Tasarımla Kalite; önceden belirlenmiş amaçlarla başlayan, güvenilir bilimsel veriler ve kalite risk yönetiminin temel alındığı, ürün ve üretim işleminin iyi bir şekilde anlaşılmasının önemini vurgulayan sistematik bir farmasötik ürün geliştirme yaklaşımıdır. Bu modern yaklaşım, kalite hedef ürün profilinin tanımlanması, kritik kalite özellikleri ve kritik işlem parametrelerinin belirlenmesi, tasarım aralığı ve kontrol stratejisi oluşturulması gibi öğelerden oluşmaktadır. Tasarımla kalite uygulamalarında proses analitik teknolojisi araçlarının ve gerçek zamanlı serbest bırakma stratejilerinin kullanımı ilaç üretim süreçlerinin etkinliğini arttırmaktadır. Tasarımla kalite yaklaşımında farmasötik ürün kalitesi, formülasyon ve üretim işlemi değişkenlerinin anlaşılması ve kontrol edilmesi ile güvence altına alınmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Tasarımla kalite, kritik kalite özellikleri, kritik işlem parametreleri, tasarım aralığı, kontrol stratejisi

Quality by Design in Pharmaceuticals

Öz

Pharmaceutical Quality by Design is a systematic approach to pharmaceutical development which begins with predefined objectives and emphases product and processes understanding. Elements of this modern approach include; defining quality target product profile, identifying critical quality attributes and critical process parameters, establishing design space, and developing control strategy. Use of process analytical technology and real time release strategies in quality by design enhances efficiency of pharmaceutical manufacturing. Pharmaceutical quality is assured by understanding and controlling formulation and manufacturing variables in quality by design approach.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Quality by design, critical quality attributes, critical process parameters, design space, control strategy

Kaynakça

• Melamud, P.A., ‘‘A Brief History of US FDA Good Manufacturing Practices’’ ISPE NJ Chapter Day, 17 June 2009, New Jersey – USA.
• Immel, B.K. : A Brief History of GMPs, Regulatory Compliance Newsletter, (Winter 2005).
• U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Pharmaceutical Quality for the 21st Century: A Risk – based Approach Final Report (September 2004).
• U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Guidance for Industry PAT – A Framework for In- novative Pharmaceutical Development, Manufacturing, and Quality Assurance, (Sep- tember 2004).
• International Conference on Harmonization, ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline: Pharmaceutical Development Q8(R2), (August 2009).
• International Conference on Harmonization, ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline: Quality Risk Management Q9, (November 2005).
• International Conference on Harmonization, ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline: Pharmaceutical Quality System Q10, (June 2008).
• Muzzio, F., ‘‘Quality by Design: A Progress Report’’ 23rd International Forum on Process Analytical Chemistry Training IFPAC 2009, 26-28 January 2009, Baltimore MD – USA.
• Berridge, J.C. : PQLI Current Status and Future Plans, J Pharm Innov, 4, 1, (2009).
• Nasr, M.M., ‘‘Risk-based CMC Review Paradigm’’, FDA Advisory Committee for Phar- maceutical Science Meeting, Manufacturing Subcommittee ACPS, 20-21 July 2004, Maryland – USA.
• U.S. Food and Drug Administration CDER, Guidance for Industry SUPAC-IR: Immedi- ate Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms Scale-up and Postapproval Changes: Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls, İn Vitro Dissolution Testing, and İn Vivo Bioequivalence Documentation (November 1995).
• U.S. Food and Drug Administration CDER, Guidance for Industry SUPAC-MR: Modi- fied Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms Scale-up and Postapproval Changes: Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls, İn Vitro Dissolution Testing, and İn Vivo Bioequivalence Documentation (September 1997).
• U.S. Food and Drug Administration CDER, Guidance for Industry: Nonsterile Semi- solid Dosage Forms Scale-up and Postapproval Changes: Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls, İn Vitro Dissolution Testing, and İn Vivo Bioequivalence Documentation (May 1997).
• Yu, L.X., ‘‘Implementation of Quality by Design: Question-based Review’’ Drug Informa- tion Association 42th Annual Meeting, 18-21 June 2006, Philadelphia – USA.
• Yu, L.X. : Pharmaceutical Quality by Design: Product and Process Development, Un- derstanding, and Control, Pharm Res, 25, 781, (2008).
• Woodcock, J. : The Concept of Pharmaceutical Quality, Am Pharm Rev, 7, 10, (2004).
• McCurdy, V., “Quality by Design”, Houson I. (Ed.), Process Understanding: For Scale- up and Manufacture of Active Ingredients, Weinheim, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, (2011), 1-16.
• Trivedi, B. : Quality by Design (QbD) in Pharmaceuticals, Int J Pharm Pharm Sci, 4, 17, (2012).
• Nasr, M.M., ‘‘FDA’s Quality Initiatives – An Update’’ 10th European Chemical Industry Council/ Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients Committee (APIC/CEFIC) Conference, 24 October 2006, Warsaw – Poland.
• Roy, S. : Quality by Design: A Holistic Concept of Building Quality in Pharmaceuticals, Int J Pharm Biomed Res, 3, 100, (2012).
• Lionberger, R.A., Lee, S.L., Lee, L., Raw, A., Yu, L.X. : Quality by Design: Concepts for ANDAs, AAPS Journal, 10, 268, (2008).
• U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Guidance for Industry ICH Q8, Q9 & Q10 Questions and Answers, (July 2012).
• Garcia, T., Cook, G., Nosal, R. : PQLI Key Topics – Criticality, Design Space, and Con- trol Strategy, J Pharm Innov, 3, 60, (2008).
• Nosal, R., Schultz, T. : PQLI Definition of Criticality, J Pharm Innov, 3, 69, (2008).
• Varu, R.K., Khanna, A. : Opportunities and Challenges to Implementing Quality by Design Approach in Generic Drug Development, Journal of Generic Medicines, 7, 60, (2010).
• Lourenço, V., Lochmann, D., Reich, G., Menezes, J.C., Herdling, T., Schewitz, J. : A Quality by Design Study Applied to an Industrial Pharmaceutical Fluid Bed Granula- tion, Eur J Pharm Biopharm, 81, 438, (2012).
• Glodek, M., Liebowitz, S., McCarthy, R., et al. : Process Robustness – A PQRI White Paper, Pharmaceutical Engineering, 26, 1, (2006).
• Singh, S., Jagota, N., Venkateshwaran, T.G., Saunders, R., ‘‘Criticality Assessment – Identification of Critical Quality Attributes (CQA) & Critical Process Parameter (CPP) for a MR Dosage Form (DP)’’ AAPS Annual Meeting and Exposition, 8-12 November 2009, Los Angeles – USA.
• U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Guidance for Industry Quality Systems Approach to Pharmaceutical CGMP Regulations, (September 2006).
• Liu, K.T., Zhao, J.H., Men, L.C., Chen, C.H., ‘‘Quality by Design and Risk Assessment for Radiopharmaceutical Manufacturing and Clinical Imaging’’, Nezhad, M.S.F. (Ed), Latest Research into Quality Control, InTech - Open Access Company, (2012), 255-292.
• Nadpara, N.P., Thumar, R.V., Kalola, V.N., Patel, P.B. : Quality by Design (QbD): A Com- plete Review, Int J Pharm Sci Rev Res, 17, 20, (2012).
• Shivhare, M., McCreath, G. : Practical Considerations for DoE Implementation in Qual- ity by Design, BioProcess Technical, 8, 22, (2010).
• Chen, C.W., Moore, C., ‘‘Role of Statistics in Pharmaceutical Development Using Qual- ity by Design Approach – an FDA Perspective ’’ FDA/Industry Statistics Workshop, 27- 29 September 2006, Washington D.C. – USA.
• Lepore, J., Spavins, J. : PQLI Design Space, J Pharm Innov, 3, 79, (2008).
• Wen, H., Park, K., ‘‘Quality by Design (QbD) Approach to Drug Development’’, Wen, H., Park, K. (Eds), Oral Controlled Release Formulation Design and Drug Delivery: Theory to Practice, New Jersey, John Wiley & Sons Inc., (2011), 280-305.
• Chatterjee, S., ‘‘Design Space Considerations’’ AAPS Annual Meeting and Exposition, October 2012, Chicago – USA.
• Peterson, J.J., ‘‘Process Predictive Distributions and QbD’’ IVT’s 2nd Annual Quality by Design Conference, 21 June 2010, Philadelphia – USA.
• Stockdale, G.W., Cheng, A. : Finding Design Space and a Reliable Operating Region Us- ing a Multivariate Bayesian Approach with Experimental Design, Quality Technology & Quantitative Management, 6, 391, (2009).
• Peterson, J.J. : A Bayesian Approach to the ICH Q8 Definition of Design Space, J Bio- pharm Stat, 18, 959, (2008).
• Talay, D.K., Dale, S., Wassgren, C., Litster, J. : Quality by Design for Wet Granulation in Pharmaceutical Processing: Assessing Models for a Priori Design and Scaling, Pow- der Technology, 240, 7, (2013).
• Charoo, N.A., Shamsher, A.A., Zidan, A.S., Rahman, Z. : Quality by Design Approach for Formulation Development: A Case Study of Dispersible Tablets, Int J Pharm, 423, 167, (2012).
• Bolton, R., Tyler, S. : PQLI Engineering Controls and Automation Strategy, J Pharm Innov, 3, 88, (2008).
• Potter, C. : PQLI Application of Science- and Risk-based Approaches (ICH Q8, Q9, and Q10) to Existing Products, J Pharm Innov, 4, 4, (2009).
• Rathore, A.S. : Roadmap for Implementation of Quality by Design (QbD) for Biotechnol- ogy Products, Trends in Biotechnology, 27, 546, (2009).
• Bondi, R.W., Drennen, J.K. : Quality by Design and the Importance of PAT in QbD, Separation Science and Technology, 10, 195, (2011).
• Somma, R. : Development Knowledge Can Increase Manufacturing Capability and Fa- cilitate Quality by Design, J Pharm Innov, 2, 87, (2007).
• European Medicines Agency, Pre-authorisation Procedural Advice for Users of the Cen- tralised Procedure, (March 2013).
• Jiang, W., Yu, L.X., ‘‘Modern Pharmaceutical Quality Regulations: Question-Based Review’’, Qui, Y., Chen, Y., Zhang, G.G.Z., Liu, L., Porter, W.R. (Eds), Developing Sol- id Oral Dosage Forms: Pharmaceutical Theory and Practice, New York, Elsevier Inc., (2009), 885-901.
• Drakulich, A. : Critical Challenges to Implementing QbD: A Q&A with FDA, Pharm Technol, 33, 90, (2009)
• European Medicines Agency, Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use, Draft Guideline on Real Time Release Testing, (February 2010).
• European Medicines Agency Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products, Note For Guidance on Parametric Release, (September 2001).
• Venkateshwaran, T.G., Simmons, S.P., Jagota, N., Esherick, D.G., Mann, P.F. : Global Regulatory Submissions for QbD: Wyeth’s Experience in the CMC Pilot, Pharm Technol, 33, 96, (2009). http://www.ptc.com/WCMS/files/117682/en/6529_QLM_WP_EN.pdf (21.06.2013)
• Nasr, M.M., ‘‘Implementation of Quality by Design – Current Perspectives on Oppor- tunities and Challenges Topic Introduction and ICH Update’’, FDA Advisory Commit- tee for Pharmaceutical Science and Clinical Pharmacology Meeting, ACPS-CP, 27 July 2011, Maryland – USA.
• Moore, C.M.V., ‘‘Quality by Design – FDA Lessons Learned and Challenges for Interna- tional Harmonization’’, International Conference on Drug Development, 28 February 2012, Austin, TX – USA.
• Miksinski, S. P., ‘‘Regulatory Assessment of Applications Containing QbD Elements- Reviewer Experience’’, American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists Meeting, 14 October 2012, Chicago, IL – USA.