Research Article

Turkish Version, Validity and Reliability of the Handwriting Proficiency Screening Questionnaire

Volume: 12 Number: 1 April 30, 2025
EN

Turkish Version, Validity and Reliability of the Handwriting Proficiency Screening Questionnaire

Abstract

Objectives: Writing proficiency is important for a student's academic success in school. In our country, the number of questionnaires evaluating the factors related to the writing skills of school-age children is quite limited. For this reason, the aim of our study is to investigate the validity and reliability of the Handwriting Proficiency Screening Questionnaire (HPSQ) in Turkish. Materials and Methods: This study included 200 children recruited from primary public schools. We evaluated the validity of the HPSQ using the Jebsen Hand Function Test (JHFT) to assess writing speed and legibility. Results: The Cronbach’s alpha was found to be 0.76 for the legibility items (1, 2, 10), 0.72 for the performance time items (3, 4, 9), and 0.74 for the physical and emotional wellbeing items (5, 6, 7, 8). The intraclass correlation coefficient test-retest score was 0.96, and it was highly reliable. Conclusion: In our study, there was a significant relationship between the HPSQ score and the legibility of the students' handwriting. The HPSQ, which is used to evaluate the handwriting of school children, was found to be valid and reliable in Turkish.

Keywords

References

  1. Amundson, S. H. (2005). Prewriting and Handwriting Skills. In J. Case- Smith (Ed.), Occupational Therapy for children (5 ed., pp. 587- 614). St. Lois, Missouri: Elsevier.
  2. Atasavun Uysal, S., & Aki, E. (2012). Relationship between writing skills and visual-motor control in low-vision students. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 115(1), 111-119. http://doi.org/10.2466/24.27.25.PMS.115.4.111-119
  3. Atasavun Uysal, S., & Duger, T. (2012). Writing and reading training effects on font type and size preferences by students with low vision. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 114(3), 837-846. http://doi.org/10.2466/15.10.11.24
  4. Beebe, J. A., & Lang C. E. (2009). Relationships and responsiveness of six upper extremity function tests during the first 6 months of recovery after stroke. Journal of Neurologic Physical Theraphy, 33(2), 96-103. http://doi.org/10.1097/NPT.0b013e3181a33638
  5. Beekhuizen, K. S., & Field-Fote, E. C. (2005). Massed practice versus massed practice with stimulation: effects on upper extremity function and cortical plasticity in individuals with incomplete cervical spinal cord injury. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 19(1), 33-45. http://doi.org/10.1177/1545968305274
  6. Daniel, M. E., & Froude, E. H. (1998). Reliability of occupational therapist and teacher evaluations of the handwriting quality of grade 5 and 6 primary school children. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 45(2), 48-58. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1630.1998.tb00782.x
  7. Duval-White, C. J., Jirikowic, T., Rios, D., Deitz, J., & Olson, H. C. (2013). Functional handwriting performance in school-age children with fetal alcohol spectrum disorders. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 67(5), 534-542. http://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2013.008243
  8. Feder, K. P., & Majnemer, A. (2003). Children's handwriting evaluation tools and their psychometric properties. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 23(3), 65-84. http://doi.org/10.1080/J006v23n03_05

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Health Care Administration

Journal Section

Research Article

Early Pub Date

April 25, 2025

Publication Date

April 30, 2025

Submission Date

May 29, 2023

Acceptance Date

November 5, 2024

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 12 Number: 1

APA
Demircioğlu Karagöz, A., Şahin, Ü. K., & Atasavun Uysal, S. (2025). Turkish Version, Validity and Reliability of the Handwriting Proficiency Screening Questionnaire. Hacettepe University Faculty of Health Sciences Journal, 12(1), 164-177. https://doi.org/10.21020/husbfd.1306277
AMA
1.Demircioğlu Karagöz A, Şahin ÜK, Atasavun Uysal S. Turkish Version, Validity and Reliability of the Handwriting Proficiency Screening Questionnaire. HUFHSJ. 2025;12(1):164-177. doi:10.21020/husbfd.1306277
Chicago
Demircioğlu Karagöz, Arzu, Ülkü Kezban Şahin, and Songül Atasavun Uysal. 2025. “Turkish Version, Validity and Reliability of the Handwriting Proficiency Screening Questionnaire”. Hacettepe University Faculty of Health Sciences Journal 12 (1): 164-77. https://doi.org/10.21020/husbfd.1306277.
EndNote
Demircioğlu Karagöz A, Şahin ÜK, Atasavun Uysal S (April 1, 2025) Turkish Version, Validity and Reliability of the Handwriting Proficiency Screening Questionnaire. Hacettepe University Faculty of Health Sciences Journal 12 1 164–177.
IEEE
[1]A. Demircioğlu Karagöz, Ü. K. Şahin, and S. Atasavun Uysal, “Turkish Version, Validity and Reliability of the Handwriting Proficiency Screening Questionnaire”, HUFHSJ, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 164–177, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.21020/husbfd.1306277.
ISNAD
Demircioğlu Karagöz, Arzu - Şahin, Ülkü Kezban - Atasavun Uysal, Songül. “Turkish Version, Validity and Reliability of the Handwriting Proficiency Screening Questionnaire”. Hacettepe University Faculty of Health Sciences Journal 12/1 (April 1, 2025): 164-177. https://doi.org/10.21020/husbfd.1306277.
JAMA
1.Demircioğlu Karagöz A, Şahin ÜK, Atasavun Uysal S. Turkish Version, Validity and Reliability of the Handwriting Proficiency Screening Questionnaire. HUFHSJ. 2025;12:164–177.
MLA
Demircioğlu Karagöz, Arzu, et al. “Turkish Version, Validity and Reliability of the Handwriting Proficiency Screening Questionnaire”. Hacettepe University Faculty of Health Sciences Journal, vol. 12, no. 1, Apr. 2025, pp. 164-77, doi:10.21020/husbfd.1306277.
Vancouver
1.Arzu Demircioğlu Karagöz, Ülkü Kezban Şahin, Songül Atasavun Uysal. Turkish Version, Validity and Reliability of the Handwriting Proficiency Screening Questionnaire. HUFHSJ. 2025 Apr. 1;12(1):164-77. doi:10.21020/husbfd.1306277