Retrospective investigation of patients with temporomandibular joint disorders selected from Şanlıurfa and its around city

Yıl 2019, , 380 - 384, 29.08.2019

Mehmet Emrah Polat , Saim Yanık

https://doi.org/10.35440/hutfd.562249

Öz

Background:
The aim of this study was to evaluate the gender and age distributions of
patients admitted to our clinic with complaints in Temporomandibular joint
(TMJ) region from Sanlıurfa and its around cities.

Methods: The patients who
referred to the Department of Oral  and
Maxillofacial Surgery of Harran University Faculty of Dentistry between January
2017 – January 2019 were included in this study. 223 women (74.08 %), 78 men
(25.92 %) patients’ information charts  were
recorded  as age, gender and kind of TME
disease.

Results: According to the
results obtained, the majority of the patients admitted to our clinic with TME
complaint were in the  30 years and under
age group and women. When the distribution of the patients according to the
primary diagnoses is considered, the most common disease is Bruxism and the
female male age ratio is found to be significantly different in favor of female
predominance only in Bruxism and Osteoarthritis patients and also female predomance
can be seen in all TMJ disease groups.

Conclusion:
In Şanlıurfa and surrounding cities, the majority of TME patients are
individuals who were under 30 years of age and women. Bruksizm is the most
common TME region disease. There is no difference in the distribution of age
groups among Bruxizm, Disc Displacement With Reduction, Disc Displacement
Without Reduction and Osteoarthritis disease groups.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Temporomandibular Joint Disease, Age, Gender

Şanlıurfa ve çevresinde temporomandibular eklem rahatsızlığı sebebiyle kliniğimize başvuran hastaların retrospektif olarak incelenmesi

Öz

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı Şanlıurfa ve çevresinden
Temporomandibular Eklem (TME) bölgesinde şikâyet ile kliniğimize başvuran
hastaların TME tanısı açısından cinsiyet ve yaş dağılımlarını
değerlendirmektir.

Materyal ve
Metot: Çalışmamıza Ocak 2017 – Ocak 2019
tarihleri arasında Harran Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Ağız, Diş ve
Çene Hastalıkları Cerrahisi Anabilim Dalına TME bölgesi şikâyeti ile başvuran
ve klinik-radyolojik muayene akabinde primer tanısı konulan hastalar dahil
edildi. 223 kadın (%74,08), 78 erkek (% 25,92) hastanın yaş, cinsiyet ve TME
hastalığı tanısı kaydedildi.

Bulgular: Elde edilen sonuçlara göre TME şikâyeti ile kliniğimize
başvuran hastaların çoğunluğu 30 yaş ve altı yaş grubunda ve kadınlardı. Primer
tanılara göre hasta dağılımına bakıldığında en sık rastlanılan hastalığın
bruksizm olduğu, kandın erkek yaş oranının sadece Bruksizm ve Osteoartrit
hastalarında kadın predominansı lehine anlamlı derecede farklı olduğu bulguları
elde edilmiştir.

Sonuç: Şanlıurfa ve çevresi bölgesinde TME hastalarının büyük
çoğunluğunu 30 yaş altı bireyler ve kadınlar oluşturmaktadır. Bruksizm en sık
ratlanılan TME bölge hastalığıdır.  Yaş
gruplarının Bruksizm, Redüksiyonlu Disk Deplasmanı, Redüksiyonsuz Disk
Deplasmanı ve Osteoartrit hastalık gruplarında dağılımı açısından bir fark
yoktur. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Temporomandibular eklem hastalıkları, Yaş, Cinsiyet

Kaynakça

• 1. Manfredini D, Chiappe G, Bosco M. Research diagnostic criteria for mtemporomandibular disorders (RDC/TMD) axis I diagnoses in an Italian patient population. J Oral Rehabil 2006;33(8):551-8.
• 2. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Clinical guideline on acquired temporomandibular disorders in infants, children and adolescents. Pediatric Dentistry. 2015; 37: 272–278. Available from: http:// www.webcitation.org/71yBvP8mF.
• 3. List T, Dworkin SF. Comparing TMD diagnoses and clinical findings at Swedish and US TMD center using Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders. J Orofac Pain. 1996;10:240–253.
• 4. Manfredini D, Chiappe G, Bosco M Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) axis I diagnoses in an Italian patient population J Oral Rehabil 2006 33; 551–558
• 5. McNeill C. Management of temporomandibular disorders: concepts and controversies. J Prosthet Dent. 1997;77:510– 522.
• 6. Velly AM, Philippe P, Gornitsky M. Heterogeneity of temporomandibular disorders: cluster and case-control analyses. J Oral Rehabil. 2002;29:969–979.
• 7. Goddard G, Karibe H. TMD prevalence in rural and urban Native American populations. Cranio. 2002;20:125–128.
• 8. Choi YS, Choung PH, Moon HS, Kim SG. Temporomandibular disorders in 19-years-old Korean men. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002;60:797–803.
• 9. Nassif NJ, Al-Salleeh F, Al-Admawi M. The prevalence and treatment needs of symptoms and signs of temporomandibular disorders among young adult males. J Oral Rehabil 2003;30(9):94450.
• 10. R.deO. Lazarin, ITS, Previdelli, R.dosS. Silva, CV, Iwaki, E, Grossmann, LI: Correlation of gender and age with magnetic resonance imaging findings in patients with arthrogenic temporomandibular disorders: a cross-sectional study. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2016; 45: 1222–1228.
• 11. Comert-Kılıc S. Does Injection of Corticosteroid After Arthrocentesis Improve Outcomes of Temporomandibular Joint Osteoarthritis? A Randomized Clinical Trial J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016;74: 2151-8
• 12. Sergio Paduano MD, DDS, Rosaria Bucci DDS, PhD, Roberto Rongo DDS, PhD, Roberta Silva DDS & Ambra Michelotti DDS (2018): Prevalence of temporomandibular disorders and oral parafunctions in adolescents from public schools in Southern Italy, CRANIO®, DOI: 10.1080/08869634.2018.1556893
• 13. Ozan F, Polat S, Kara I, Küçük D, Polat HB. Prevalence study of signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders in a Turkish population. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007;8:35-42.
• 14. Ahmad M, Hollender L, Anderson Q, Kartha K, Ohrbach R, Truelove EL, John MT, Schiffman EL. Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (RDC/TMD): development of image analysis criteria and examiner reliability for image analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;107:844-860
• 15. Guarda-Nardini L, Piccotti F, Mogno G, Manfredini LFD(2012) Age-Related Differences in Temporomandibular Disorder Diagnoses, CRANIO®, 30:2, 103-109, DOI: 10.1179/crn.2012.015
• 16. Poveda-Roda R, Bagán JV, Jiménez-Soriano Y, Fons-Font A. Retrospective study of a series of 850 patients with temporomandibular dysfunction (TMD). Clinical and radiological findings. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2009 Dec 1;14 (12):e628-34.
• 17. Dao TT, LeReche L. Gender Differences in Pain. Journal of Orofacial Pain 2000;14:169-84
• 18. Godoy F, Rosenblatt A, Godoy-Bezerra J. Temporomandibular disorders and associated factors in Brazilian teenagers: a cross-sectional study. Int J Prosthodont 2007;20(6):599-604.
• 19. Nekora-Azak A, Evlioglu G, Ordulu M, Issever H. Prevalence of symptoms associated with temporomandibular disorders in a Turkish population. J Oral Rehabil 2006;33(2):81-4.
• 20. Schmitter M, Rammelsberg P, Hassel A.The prevalence of signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders in very old subjects. J Oral Rehabil 2005;32(7):467-73
• 21. Levitt SR, McKinney MW. Validating the TMJ scale in a national sample of 10,000 patients: demographic and epidemiologic characteristics. J Orofac Pain 1994;8:25-35
• 22. Tozoglu S, Yavuz MS, Büyükkurt MC, Dayı E, Miloğlu Ö, Savaş Z. Erzurum ve çevresinden tme rahatsızlığı nedeniyle kliniğimize başvuran hastaların retrospektif incelenmesi. Atatürk Üniv. Diş Hek. Fak. Derg. 2008;3:90-93