Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster
Yıl 2019, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1, 60 - 64, 15.04.2019

Öz

Kaynakça

  • 1. Gencer, O., Özüdoğru, T., Kaynak, M. A., Yılmaz, A., & Ören, N. Türkiye’de pamuk üretimi ve sorunları, TMMOB, Ziraat Mühendisleri Odası, Türkiye Ziraat Mühendisligi, VI. Teknik Kongresi 2005.
  • 2. Kaya H., Dolunçay A., Toklu P., Türkoglu S., Nasırcı Z., Süllü S., Özbek B., Adana, Kahramanmaraş ve Gaziantep illerinde pamuk ipliği üretimi yapan tekstil işletmelerinin genel durumu, pamuk lifine ilişkin kalite beklentileri, sorunları ve çözüm önerileri. Tekstil ve Mühendis. 2006. 13(62-63): p. 1-15.
  • 3. Anonim, Itmf: Pamukta Kontaminasyon Oranı Arttı, [cited 2017 05 October]; Available from: http://www.textotex.com/haber/elyafiplik/itmfpamukta-kontaminasyon-orani-artti.html.
  • 4. Uster®, On-Line Quality Management on Bobbin Machines, Uster Quantum 2 Manuel Application,2009.
  • 5. Uster®, Modern Yarn Cleaning on Bobbin Machines, Uster News Bulletin, No:48, September 2011.
  • 6. International Trade Centre, Cotton Exporter’s Guide, [cited 2018 20 July]; Available from: http://www.cottonguide.org/

Comparison of contamination on yarns produced from local and us blend cotton types

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1, 60 - 64, 15.04.2019

Öz

Contamination on cotton fibers
is one of the most important problems that shows itself on yarn and fabric.
Contamination usually consists of plant leafs, parts, etc. on the cotton and
this situation occurs during the harvesting and transporting. Also
contamination occurs by bale pieces such as burlap, nylon and polypropylene
residues. Developed technologies are using for selection of the foreign
material in blowroom and bobbin processes, but it is not possible to completely
remove the foreign material from the yarn. In general, the amount of foreign
material in the local cotton is more than the US cotton.  In this study, yarn production is made in the
same specifications with local and US cotton, then yarn foreign material
cuttings on bobbin machine and yarn quality values are compared. According to
the results, it is seen that yarns produced by US cotton have less
contamination than the yarns produced by local cotton. With this situation it
is determined that, despite less contamination, yarn technical values of US
cotton is worse than local cotton.  

Kaynakça

  • 1. Gencer, O., Özüdoğru, T., Kaynak, M. A., Yılmaz, A., & Ören, N. Türkiye’de pamuk üretimi ve sorunları, TMMOB, Ziraat Mühendisleri Odası, Türkiye Ziraat Mühendisligi, VI. Teknik Kongresi 2005.
  • 2. Kaya H., Dolunçay A., Toklu P., Türkoglu S., Nasırcı Z., Süllü S., Özbek B., Adana, Kahramanmaraş ve Gaziantep illerinde pamuk ipliği üretimi yapan tekstil işletmelerinin genel durumu, pamuk lifine ilişkin kalite beklentileri, sorunları ve çözüm önerileri. Tekstil ve Mühendis. 2006. 13(62-63): p. 1-15.
  • 3. Anonim, Itmf: Pamukta Kontaminasyon Oranı Arttı, [cited 2017 05 October]; Available from: http://www.textotex.com/haber/elyafiplik/itmfpamukta-kontaminasyon-orani-artti.html.
  • 4. Uster®, On-Line Quality Management on Bobbin Machines, Uster Quantum 2 Manuel Application,2009.
  • 5. Uster®, Modern Yarn Cleaning on Bobbin Machines, Uster News Bulletin, No:48, September 2011.
  • 6. International Trade Centre, Cotton Exporter’s Guide, [cited 2018 20 July]; Available from: http://www.cottonguide.org/
Toplam 6 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Bölüm Research Articles
Yazarlar

Gülbin Fidan 0000-0002-7958-2626

Yasemin Korkmaz 0000-0002-0030-6259

Yayımlanma Tarihi 15 Nisan 2019
Gönderilme Tarihi 15 Mart 2018
Kabul Tarihi 12 Eylül 2018
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2019 Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Fidan, G., & Korkmaz, Y. (2019). Comparison of contamination on yarns produced from local and us blend cotton types. International Advanced Researches and Engineering Journal, 3(1), 60-64.
AMA Fidan G, Korkmaz Y. Comparison of contamination on yarns produced from local and us blend cotton types. Int. Adv. Res. Eng. J. Nisan 2019;3(1):60-64.
Chicago Fidan, Gülbin, ve Yasemin Korkmaz. “Comparison of Contamination on Yarns Produced from Local and Us Blend Cotton Types”. International Advanced Researches and Engineering Journal 3, sy. 1 (Nisan 2019): 60-64.
EndNote Fidan G, Korkmaz Y (01 Nisan 2019) Comparison of contamination on yarns produced from local and us blend cotton types. International Advanced Researches and Engineering Journal 3 1 60–64.
IEEE G. Fidan ve Y. Korkmaz, “Comparison of contamination on yarns produced from local and us blend cotton types”, Int. Adv. Res. Eng. J., c. 3, sy. 1, ss. 60–64, 2019.
ISNAD Fidan, Gülbin - Korkmaz, Yasemin. “Comparison of Contamination on Yarns Produced from Local and Us Blend Cotton Types”. International Advanced Researches and Engineering Journal 3/1 (Nisan 2019), 60-64.
JAMA Fidan G, Korkmaz Y. Comparison of contamination on yarns produced from local and us blend cotton types. Int. Adv. Res. Eng. J. 2019;3:60–64.
MLA Fidan, Gülbin ve Yasemin Korkmaz. “Comparison of Contamination on Yarns Produced from Local and Us Blend Cotton Types”. International Advanced Researches and Engineering Journal, c. 3, sy. 1, 2019, ss. 60-64.
Vancouver Fidan G, Korkmaz Y. Comparison of contamination on yarns produced from local and us blend cotton types. Int. Adv. Res. Eng. J. 2019;3(1):60-4.



Creative Commons License

Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.