Effects of situational and cultural factors on successful gift giving

Year 2025, Volume: 54 Issue: 3, 390 - 407, 31.12.2025

Berna Tarı Kasnakoğlu , Esma Betül Özegen

https://doi.org/10.26650/ibr.2025.54.1485947

https://izlik.org/JA77RS56EL

Abstract

This study investigates gift giving, reciprocity expectations, and how ‘success’ in gift giving may be achieved. It is discussed in the literature that the success of gift-giving may depend on the ongoing relationship between the gift partners, the gift itself, and the gift-giving context, including the atmosphere, the involvement of other people, and the occasion. We first employ qualitative methodology to deeply understand the phenomenon in a certain sociocultural context. The aim of this phase was to identify particular characteristics of the gift-giving situation to be used in the experimental study. Then we test f ive hypotheses in which liking a gift leads to a willingness to reciprocate. Results confirm that an appropriate gift increases the recipient’s positive feelings toward the gift giver, and these feelings increase the recipient’s willingness to reciprocate. We conclude that social identities and the maintenance of within group relations become more prevalent in certain gift-giving contexts. When there are disliked others, for instance, an unsuccessful gift makes the gift-giver have a much larger and negative influence on reciprocity than when there are likeable people in the environment.

Keywords

Gift giving , Social identity , Multi-method research , Qualitative research , Moderation analysis

References

• Algoe, S. B., Haidt, J., & Gable, S. L. (2008). Beyond reciprocity: Gratitude and relationships in everyday life. Emotion, 8(3), 425–429. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.8.3.425 google scholar
• Antón, C., Camarero, C., & Gil, F. (2014). The culture of gift giving: What do consumers expect from commercial and personal contexts? Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 13(1), 31-41. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1452. google scholar
• Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of personality and social psychology, 63(4), 596. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596. google scholar
• Bagozzi, R. (1975), "Marketing as Exchange," Journal of Marketing, 39(4), 32-39. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224297503900405. google scholar
• Baskin, E., Wakslak, C. J., Trope, Y., & Novemsky, N. (2014). When feasibility matters more to gift receivers than to givers: A construallevel approach to gift giving. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(1), 169–182. https://doi.org/10.1086/676669 google scholar
• Bazeley, P. (2018). Integrating analyses in mixed methods research. Los Angeles, CA: Sage. google scholar
• Beatty, S. E., Yoon, M. H., Grunert, S. C., & Helgeson, J. G. (1996). An examination of gift-giving behaviors and personal values in four countries. In Gift-giving: A research anthology, Cele Otnes and Richard F. Beltramini (Eds.), Bowling Green, OH: Bowling Green University Press,19-36. https://doi.org/10.1086/208662. google scholar
• Belbağ, A. G. (2020). Exploring the gift-giving rituals of the new middle-class consumers in a Muslim society. In Marketization: Theory and Evidence from Emerging Economies (pp. 75–96). [DOI unavailable] google scholar
• Belk, R. W. (1976). It's the thought that counts: A signed digraph analysis of gift-giving. Journal of Consumer Research, 3(3), 155-162. https://doi.org/10.1086/209357. google scholar
• Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of consumer research, 15(2), 139-168. https://doi.org/10.1086/209154. google scholar
• Belk, R. W. (1996). The meaning of things: Domestic symbols and the self. Cambridge University Press. [DOI unavailable] google scholar
• Belk, R. W., & Coon, G. S. (1993). Gift-giving and agapic love: An alternative to the exchange paradigm based on dating experiences. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(3), 393-417. https://doi.org/10.1086/209357. google scholar
• Bienenstock, E. J., & Bianchi, A. J. (2004). Activating performance expectations and status differences through gift exchange: Experimental results. Social Psychology Quarterly, 67(3), 310-318. https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250406700306. google scholar
• Black, I., Shaw, D. & Trebeck, K. (2016) Changing the narrative in our relationship with consumption. Families, Relationships and Societies, 5(3), 463-466. https://doi.org/10.1332/204674316X1475850854242. google scholar
• Blumer, H. (1954). What is wrong with social theory? American Sociological Review, 19(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.2307/2088165 google scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre. 1986. “The Forms of Capital.” Pp. 241-258 in Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, J. G. Richardson (Ed.) New York: Greenwood Press. google scholar
• Camerer, C. (1988). Gifts as economic signals and social symbols. American Journal of Sociology, 94(Suppl), 180-214. https://doi.org/10. 1086/228946. google scholar
• Caputo, C. (1995). Gift-giving: A conceptual framework. Journal of Consumer Research, 22(3), 336–347. https://doi.org/10.1086/209453 google scholar
• Carmichael, H. L., & MacLeod, W. B. (1997). Gift giving and the evolution of cooperation. International Economic Review, 485-509. https:// doi.org/10.2307/2527277 google scholar
• Chan, C., & Mogilner, C. (2017). Experiential gifts foster stronger social relationships than material gifts. Journal of Consumer Research, 43(6), 913-931. https://doi.org/ 10.1093/cr/ucw067. google scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage Publications. google scholar
• Cheal, D. J. (1986). The social dimensions of gift behaviour. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 3(4), 423-439. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/ 0265407586034002. google scholar
• Cheal, D. (1987). ‘Showing them you love them’: gift-giving and the dialectic of intimacy. The Sociological Review, 35(1), 150-169. https:// doi.org/10.1111/ j.1467-954X.1987.tb00007.x. google scholar
• Chiba, T., Iketani, S., Han, K., & Ono, A. (2009). A comprehensive model of anxiety in gift giving. International Review of Business Research Papers, 5(4), 322-334. DOI not available. google scholar
• Colaner, C. W., Horstman, H. K., & Rittenour, C. E. (2018). Negotiating adoptive and birth shared family identity: A social identity complexity approach. Western Journal of Communication, 82(4), 393-415. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2017.1384564. google scholar
• Davies, B., & Harré, R. (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the theory of social behaviour, 20(1), 43-63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.1990.tb00174.x. google scholar
• Dunbar, N. E., Bippus, A. M., & Young, S. L. (2008). Interpersonal dominance in relational conflict: A view from dyadic power theory. Inter- persona: An International Journal on Personal Relationships, 2(1), 1-33. https://doi.org/10.5964/ijpr.v2i1.16. google scholar
• Eckstein, S. (2001). Community as gift-giving: Collectivistic roots of volunteerism. American Sociological Review, 829-851. https://doi.org/ 10.2307/3088875. google scholar
• Ertimur, B., & Sandıkcı, Ö. (2005). Giving gold jewelry and coins as gifts: The interplay of utilitarianism and symbolism. Advances in Consumer Research, 32(1). [DOI unavailable] google scholar
• Flynn, F. J., & Adams, G. S. (2009). Money can’t buy love: Asymmetric beliefs about gift price and feelings of appreciation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(2), 404-409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.11.003. google scholar
• Gaertner, L., Sedikides, C., & Graetz, K. (1999). In search of self-definition: Motivational primacy of the individual self, motivational primacy of the collective self, or contextual primacy?. Journal of personality and social psychology, 76(1), 5. https://doi.org/10. 1037/0022-3514.76.1.5. google scholar
• Garner, T., Wagner, J., 1991. Economic dimensions of household gift giving. Journal of Consumer Research 18, 368–379. https://doi.org/ 10.1086/209266. google scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017). Theoretical sampling. In Sociological methods (pp. 105–114). Routledge. google scholar
• Goodwin, C., Smith, K. L., & Spiggle, S. (1990). Gift giving: consumer motivation and the gift purchase process. ACR North American Advances. google scholar
• Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25(2), 161–178. https://doi.org/ 10.2307/2092623 google scholar
• Green, R. T., & Alden, D. L. (1988). Functional equivalence in cross‐cultural consumer behavior: Gift-giving in Japan and the United States. Psychology & Marketing, 5(2), 155-168. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.4220050205. google scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: The Guilford Press. google scholar
• Huang, M. H., & Yu, S. (2000). Duration Models to Analyze Dating Relationships: The Controversial Role of Gift Giving. Family and consumer sciences research journal, 28(4), 411-427. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077727X00284001. google scholar
• Joy, A. (2001). Gift-giving in Hong Kong and the continuum of social ties. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(2), 239-256. https://doi.org/ 10.1086/322900. google scholar
• Karimi, A. (2016). Iranian homosexuals: Social identity formation and question of femininity. Culture & Psychology, 22(2), 296-313. https:// doi.org/10.1177/1354067X14551296. google scholar
• Klein, J. G., Lowrey, T. M., & Otnes, C. C. (2015). Identity-based motivations and anticipated reckoning: Contributions to gift-giving theory from an identity-stripping context. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25(3), 431-448. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jcps.2015.01.003. google scholar
• Komter, A. E. (1996). Reciprocity as a principle of exclusion: Gift-giving in the Netherlands. Sociology, 30(2), 299-316. https://doi.org/10. 1177/0038038596 030002006. google scholar
• Lane, J. F. (2000). Pierre Bourdieu: A Critical introduction. Pluto Press. google scholar
• Lei, X., Rau, P. L. P., & Huang, H. (2021). Regional differences in the effect of interpersonal relationship on trust and trustworthiness in China. PsyCh Journal, 10(6), 878-888. https://doi.org/10.1002/pchj.486 google scholar
• Lotz, S. L., Shim, S., & Gehrt, K. C. (2003). A study of Japanese consumers' cognitive hierarchies in formal and informal gift‐giving situations. Psychology & Marketing, 20(1), 59-85. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.10059. google scholar
• Mauss, M. (1954). The gift: Forms and functions of exchange in archaic societies. Cohen & West. [DOI unavailable] google scholar
• Mauss, Marcel (1969), The Gift: Form and Functions of Exchange in Archaic Societies, New York: Norton. google scholar
• Mauss, M. (1990). The gift: Forms and functions of exchange in archaic societies (W. D. Halls, Trans.). W. W. Norton & Company. (Original work published 1925) google scholar
• McCracken, G. (1988). The long interview (Vol. 13). Sage. google scholar
• McCullough, M. E., Kimeldorf, M. B., & Cohen, A. D. (2008). An adaptation for altruism: The social causes, social effects, and social evolution of gratitude. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(4), 281–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00590.x google scholar
• Otnes, C., Lowrey, T. M., & Kim, Y. C. (1993). Gift selection for easy and difficult recipients: a social roles interpretation. Journal of consumer research, 20(2), 229-244. https://doi.org/10.1086/209345 google scholar
• Otnes, C., & Young, M. (Eds.). (1997). Gift-giving: A research anthology. Bowling Green State University Popular Press. google scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. google scholar
• Pederson, J., LeFebvre, L., & Griffin, D. (2020). Relational Surprise Experiences as a Unique Form of Relational Maintenance. Interpersona: An International Journal on Personal Relationships, 14(2), 118-136. https://doi.org/10.5964/ijpr.v14i2.3647 google scholar
• Pellissery, S. (2008). Social hierarchies, economic inequalities and interpersonal relationships: an overview from India. Interpersona: An International Journal on Personal Relationships, 2(2), 243-259. https://doi.org/10.5964/ijpr.v2i2.28 google scholar
• Posner, R., 1980. A theory of primitive society with special reference to law. Journal of Law and Economics 23(1), 1–53. https://doi.org/ 10.1086/466951. google scholar
• Qian, W., Razzaque, M. A., & Keng, K. A. (2007). Chinese cultural values and gift‐giving behavior. Journal of Consumer Marketing. 24(4), 214-228. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363760710756002. google scholar
• Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., Nicholls, C. M., & Ormston, R. (Eds.). (2014). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications. google scholar
• Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2012). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. google scholar
• Ruffle, B. J. (1999). Gift giving with emotions. Journal of economic behavior & organization, 39(4), 399-420. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(99)00048-7 google scholar
• Ruth, J. A., Otnes, C. C., & Brunel, F. F. (1999). Gift receipt and the reformulation of interpersonal relationships. Journal of consumer research, 25(4), 385-402. https://doi.org/10.1086/209546. google scholar
• Saad, G., & Gill, T. (2003). An evolutionary psychology perspective on gift-giving among young adults. Psychology & Marketing, 20(9), 765-784. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/mar.10096. google scholar
• Sanghera, B., Ablezova, M., & Botoeva, A. (2012). Attachment, emotions and kinship caregiving: an investigation into separation distress and family relatedness in post-Soviet Kyrgyzstani households. Families, Relationships and Societies, 1(3), 379-396. https://doi. org/10.1332/204674312X656293. google scholar
• Sargeant, A., & Woodliffe, L. (2007). Gift giving: An interdisciplinary review. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 12(4), 275-307. https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.308. google scholar
• Sarıkaya, N., & Köksalan, N. (2021). The role of emotional satisfaction in gift-giving behavior: A qualitative research. Düzce Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 11(1), 121–132. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.21.18 google scholar
• Schieffelin, Edward (1980), Reciprocity and the Construction of Reality, Man, 15(3), 502-517. https://doi.org/10.2307/2801347. google scholar
• Scobie, E. D., & Scobie, G. E. W. (1998). Damaging events: The perceived need for forgiveness. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 28(4), 373-402. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5914.00081. google scholar
• Scott, C. R. (2007). Communication and social identity theory: Existing and potential connections in organizational identification research. Communication studies, 58(2), 123-138. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510970701341063. google scholar
• Seidman, I. (2013). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences (4th ed.). Teachers College Press. google scholar
• Sherry Jr, J. F. (1983). Gift giving in anthropological perspective. Journal of consumer research, 10(2), 157-168. https://doi.org/10.1086/ 208956. google scholar
• Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant observation. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston. google scholar
• Statistica (2022). “Estimated size of the global personalized gifts market from 2018 to 2019, with a forecast for 2020 and 2026”, https:// www.statista.com/statistics/ 1283363/global-personalized-gifts-market-size/. Accessed 02.03.2024. google scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1997). Grounded theory in practice. Sage. google scholar
• Tesser, A., & Paulhus, D. (1983). The definition of self: Private and public self-evaluation management strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(4), 672. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.4.672. google scholar
• Titmus, R. (1971). The gift relationship. Pantheon: New York. google scholar
• Veblen, Thorstein (1899). The Theory of the Leisure Class. Project Gutenberg. google scholar
• Ward, M. K., & Broniarczyk, S. M. (2011). It’s not me, it’s you: How gift-giving creates giver identity threat as a function of social closeness. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(1), 164-181. https://doi.org/10.1086/658166. google scholar
• Webley, P., & Wilson, R. (1989). Social relationships and the unacceptability of money as a gift. Journal of Social Psychology, 129(1), 85-91. https://doi.org/10.1080/%2000224545.1989.9711702, google scholar
• Wilson, S. (2014). Sad to say but my whole life is on that computer: Reflecting on emotions, intimacies and consumption in difficult circumstances and how to make sure these issues are reflected in policy discourse, Families, Relationships and Societies 3(1), 149–52. https://doi.org.10.1332/204674313X13814984759010. google scholar