Recommendation of Active Employment Policy Based on Entrepreneurship and Social Innovation: Social Entrepreneurship Support Model for Youth in Turkey

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 51 Sayı: 2, 517 - 533, 30.12.2022

Volkan Işık

https://doi.org/10.26650/ibr.2022.51.871670

Öz

In this study, the social entrepreneurship support model will be designed in Turkey as an active employment policy proposal based on entrepreneurship and social innovation in the fight against youth unemployment. Within this framework, the model aims to organize a social entrepreneurship training program for unemployed youth and NEET (neither employed nor in education or training) youth by the Turkish Public Employment Agency (ISKUR). Based on this, it is envisaged that similar support to the ISKUR Entrepreneurship Training Program implemented by the state for young people will be implemented under the name of the Social Entrepreneurship Support Program in cooperation with ISKUR-KOSGEB and ASHOKA. The model also suggests to give financial and consultancy support for those who successfully complete training. This support is thought to be important for start-up social entrepreneurs. Finally, this study aims to discuss the possibility to implement a social entrepreneurship support model for youth in Turkey. Especially in terms of developing countries, the model is believed to be an alternative means of struggle with the fight against youth unemployment.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Social Entrepreneurship, Social Innovation, Youth Unemployment, Social Responsibility

Kaynakça

• Alvord, S. H., Brown, L. D., & Letts, C. W. (2004). Social entrepreneurship and societal transformation. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Vol. 40 No.3, pp.260–282.
• Austin, J., Stevenson, H., & Wei-Skillern, J. (2003).Social entrepreneurship and commercial entrepreneurship: Same, different, orboth?, Harvard Business School.
• Betcherman, Gordon (1999). Active Labor Market Policies: Policy Issues For East Asia, Washington D.C.: World Bank, Social Protection Unit.
• Boschee, J. (1998). “Merging mission and money: A board member’s guide to social entrepreneurship”. available at: http://www.socialent.org/pdfs/MergingMission.pdf. (accessed 04 July 2020)
• British Council (2019). The State of Social Enterprise in Turkey.
• Dees, G. (1998). “The meaning of social entrepreneurship”. available at: http://www.fuqua.duke.edu/centers/case/documents/dees_SE.pdf. (accessed 12 June 2020)
• Husted, B. W., Salazar, J. de J. (2006) Taking Friedman seriously: Maximizing profits and social performance. Journal of Management Studies Vol.43 No.1, pp.75–91.
• ILO (2019), World Employment and Social Outlook.
• ILO (2020), World Employment and Social Outlook.
• Işık, Volkan (2016). Çalışmanın Evrimi ve Sosyal Girişim, Ekin Yayınları, Bursa.
• Kasapoglu, M.M, Murat, s. (2018). Active Employment Policies and Employment Policies Applied by Iskur in Turkey a Current Overview. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi Vol.10 No.25, pp.485-502.
• Kent, D., Dacin, M. T. (2013) Bankers at the gate: Microfinance and the high cost of borrowed logics. Journal of Business Venturing Vol.28 No.6, pp.759–773.
• Manyaka-Boshielo, S. J. (2017). Exploring possibilities of social entrepreneurial activities as a tool to reduce unemployment amongst churches in Tshwane central and Mamelodi East: Pretoria case study. HTS Theological Studies, Vol.73 No.3, pp.1-7.
• Miller, T. L., Wesley II, C. L. (2010) Assessing mission and resources for social change: An organizational identity perspective on social venture capitalists’ decision criteria. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice Vol.34 No.4, pp.705–733.
• OECD, “Education at a Glance 2020”, available at: https://data.oecd.org/youthinac/youth-not-in-employment-education-or-training-neet.htm (accessed 20 January 2021)
• Prabhu, G. N. (1999). Social Entrepreneurial Leadership. Career Development International. Vol.4 No.3, pp.140-145.
• Sagawa, S., & Segal, E. (2000). Common interest, common good: Creating value through business and social sector partnership. California Management Review, Vol.42, No.2, pp.105–122.
• Short, J. C., Moss, T. W., Lumpkin, G. T. (2009) Research in social entrepreneurship: Past contributions and future opportunities. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal Vol.3 No.2, pp.161–194.
• Tiwari, P., Bhat, A. K., & Tikoria, J. (2017). Predictors of social entrepreneurial intention: an empirical study. South Asian Journal of Business Studies, Vol.6 No.1, 53-79. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAJBS-04-2016-0032 (accessed 16 October 2020)
• Türkiye Üçüncü Sektör Vakfı. (TUSEV) (2012). Sosyal Girişimcilik Projesi: Türkiye’de Sosyal Girişimlerin Yasal ve Mali Altyapısının Güçlendirilmesine İlişkin Politika Belgesi.
• UNDP. (2008). Social Enterprise: A New Model for Poverty Reduction and Employment Generation, 21.
• UK Goverment Report, Goverment for Digital, Culture Media&Sport; Department for Bussiness, Energy & Industrial Strategy. Social Enterprise Market Trends 2017, September 2017.
• Uşen, Ş. (2007). Aktif Emek Piyasası Politikaları, Journal of Çalışma ve Toplum, No.2, pp.65-94.
• Waddock, S. A. (1988). Building successful partnerships. SloanManagement Review, Vol.29 No.4, pp.17–23.