iduhes Izmir Democracy University Health Sciences Journal 2651-4575 İzmir Demokrasi Üniversitesi 10.52538/iduhes.1344056 Clinical Sciences (Other) Klinik Tıp Bilimleri (Diğer) Os trigonum ve Stieda prosesinin görülme sıklığı, ayak bileği MRG ile posterior ayak bileği ağrısı ve tendinopati ilişkisinin belirlenmesi Frequency of Os trigonum and Stieda process, determination of its relation with posterior ankle pain and tendinopathy by ankle MRI https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3932-2272 Poçan Süheyl NİŞANTAŞI ÜNİVERSİTESİ https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5485-9337 Karakaş Levent Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi, İstanbul Gaziosmanpaşa Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi 09 30 2023 6 2 250 263 08 16 2023 09 11 2023 Copyright © 2018, Izmir Democracy University Health Sciences Journal 2018 Izmir Democracy University Health Sciences Journal

ÖZETAmaç: posterior ayak bileği ağrısı olan hastalarda Os trigonumun görülme sıklığını ve manyetik rezonans görüntüleme (MRG) ile saptanan diğer patolojiler ile ilişkisini araştırmak.Yöntemler: Ocak 2017 ile Mayıs 2023 tarihleri arasında elde edilen MRG görüntülerinin yeniden incelenmesiyle yapılan retrospektif bir çalışmadır. Çalışmaya posterior veya posterolateral ayak bileği ağrısı nedeniyle tanısal amaçlı ayak bileği MRG yapılan 482 hasta (496 ayak bileği) dahil edildi. MRG görüntüleri şu parametreler açısından yeniden incelendi: kırıklar, kontüzyon, tendinozis, bağ yaralanması, artrit, efüzyon, Stieda prosesi varlığı, posterior ayak bileği bursa sıkışması, Os trigonum, retrokalkaneal bursit, ganglion. kist, yaygın osteofitler, aksesuar naviküler kemik, osteokondritis dissekanların varlığı ve derecesi ve Aşil tendon patolojisinin varlığı ve tipi.Bulgular: Katılımcıların yaş ortalaması 41,96 ± 15,89 (7–83 yaş) ve %51,04'ü (n=246) erkekti. Os trigonum 17 hastada (%3.43) saptandı ve hiçbir olgu bilateral değildi. Os trigonum olasılığı erkeklerde anlamlı olarak daha yüksekti (p = 0,016, OR: 4,725, %95 GA: 1,341 - 16,655). Stieda prosesi 186 hastada (%37.5) saptandı. Aksesuar navikular kemik 8 (%1,61) hastada tespit edildi. Patolojik metatarsal kırığı olan hasta yüzdesi Os trigonumlu hastalarda anlamlı olarak daha yüksekti (p=0.034). Os trigonumlu hastalarda Stieda prosesi sıklığı anlamlı olarak daha düşüktü (p = 0,013, OR: 0,099, %95 GA: 0,013 - 0,755). Os trigonum grubunda önemli ölçüde daha az talotibial efüzyon vakası vardı (p = 0.030).Sonuç: Os trigonum erkeklerde anlamlı olarak daha sık görülürken, Stieda prosesi ve talotibial efüzyon varlığında daha az sıklıkta görülmektedir.

ABSTRACTAim: To investigate the frequency of Os trigonum and Stieda process and the relationship of Os trigonum with other pathologies detected by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with posterior ankle pain.Methods: This was a retrospective study conducted by re-examining MRI images obtained between January 2017 and May 2023. The study included 482 patients (496 ankles) who underwent ankle MRI for diagnostic purposes due to posterior or posterolateral ankle pain. MRI images were re-examined for the following parameters: fractures, contusion, tendinosis, ligament injury, arthritis, effusion, presence of Stieda process, posterior ankle bursa impingement, Os trigonum, retrocalcaneal bursitis, ganglion cyst, widespread osteophytes, accessory navicular bone, presence and grade of osteochondritis dissecans, and presence and type of Achilles tendon pathology. Results: The mean age of the participants was 41.96 ± 15.89 (7–83 years), and 51.04% (n = 246) were male. Os trigonum was detected in 17 patients (3.43 %), and none of the cases were bilateral. The likelihood of Os trigonum was significantly higher in males (p = 0.016, OR: 4.725, 95% CI: 1.341 - 16.655). Stieda process was detected in 186 patients (37.5 %). The accessory navicular bone was detected in 8 (1.61%). The percentage of patients with pathological metatarsal fractures was significantly higher in patients with Os trigonum (p = 0.034). The frequency of Stieda process was significantly lower in patients with Os trigonum (p = 0.013, OR: 0.099, 95% CI: 0.013 - 0.755). There were significantly fewer cases of talotibial effusion in the Os trigonum group (p = 0.030).Conclusion: While Os trigonum appears to be significantly more frequent among males, it is less frequent in the presence of the Stieda process and talotibial effusion.

 Magnetic resonance imaging Os trigonum Posterior ankle pain Talotibial effusion Manyetik rezonans görüntüleme Os trigonum Posterior ayak bileği ağrısı Talotibial efüzyon Berndt, A. L., Harty, M. (1959). Transchondral fractures (osteochondritis dissecans) of the talus. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 41-a, 988-1020. Bureau, N. J., Cardinal, E., Hobden, R., Aubin, B. (2000). Posterior ankle impingement syndrome: MR imaging findings in seven patients. Radiology, 215(2), 497-503. doi:10.1148/radiology.215.2.r00ma01497 Burman, M., Lapidus, P. W. (1931). The functional disturbances caused by the inconstant bones and sesamoids of the foot. Arch Surg, 22(6), 936-975. Corte-Real, N. M., Moreira, R. M., Guerra-Pinto, F. (2012). Arthroscopic treatment of tenosynovitis of the flexor hallucis longus tendon. Foot Ankle Int, 33(12), 1108-1012. doi:10.3113/fai.2012.1108 Coskun, N., Yuksel, M., Cevener, M., Arican, R. Y., Ozdemir, H., Bircan, O., Sindel, T., Ilgi, S., Sindel, M. (2009). Incidence of accessory ossicles and sesamoid bones in the feet: a radiographic study of the Turkish subjects. Surg Radiol Anat, 31(1), 19-24. doi:10.1007/s00276-008-0383-9 Derin Cicek, E., Bankaoglu, M. (2020). Prevalence of Elongated Posterior Talar Process (Stieda Process) Detected by Radiography. Int J Morphol, 38(4), 894-898. Guo, S., Yan, Y. Y., Lee, S. S. Y., Tan, T. J. (2019). Accessory ossicles of the foot-an imaging conundrum. Emerg Radiol, 26(4), 465-478. doi:10.1007/s10140-019-01688-x Kalbouneh, H. M., Alajoulin, O., Alsalem, M., Mansour, Y., Shawaqfeh, J., Altarawneh, T., Alhusni, D., Al-Muhtaseb, M. H. (2019). Incidence of symptomatic os trigonum among nonathletic patients with ankle sprain. Surg Radiol Anat, 41(12), 1433-1439. doi:10.1007/s00276-019-02354-0 Karasick, D., Schweitzer, M. E. (1996). The os trigonum syndrome: imaging features. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 166(1), 125-129. doi:10.2214/ajr.166.1.8571860 Kudaş, S., Dönmez, G., Işık, Ç., Çelebi, M., Çay, N., Bozkurt, M. (2016). Posterior ankle impingement syndrome in football players: Case series of 26 elite athletes. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc, 50(6), 649-654. doi:10.1016/j.aott.2016.03.008 Mann, R. W., Owsley, D. W. (1990). Os trigonum. Variation of a common accessory ossicle of the talus. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, 80(10), 536-539. doi:10.7547/87507315-80-10-536 Maquirriain, J. (2005). Posterior ankle impingement syndrome. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 13(6), 365-371. doi:10.5435/00124635-200510000-00001 Mc, D. A. (1955). The os trigonum. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 37-b(2), 257-265. doi:10.1302/0301-620x.37b2.257 Mellado, J. M., Ramos, A., Salvadó, E., Camins, A., Danús, M., Saurí, A. (2003). Accessory ossicles and sesamoid bones of the ankle and foot: imaging findings, clinical significance and differential diagnosis. Eur Radiol, 13 Suppl 6, L164- L177. doi:10.1007/s00330-003-2011-8 Nault, M. L., Kocher, M. S., Micheli, L. J. (2014). Os trigonum syndrome. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 22(9), 545-553. doi:10.5435/jaaos-22-09-545 Nwawka, O. K., Hayashi, D., Diaz, L. E., Goud, A. R., Arndt, W. F., 3rd, Roemer, F. W., Malguria, N., Guermazi, A. (2013). Sesamoids and accessory ossicles of the foot: anatomical variability and related pathology. Insights Imaging, 4(5), 581-593. doi:10.1007/s13244-013-0277-1 Pesquer, L., Guillo, S., Meyer, P., Hauger, O. (2014). US in ankle impingement syndrome. J Ultrasound, 17(2), 89-97. doi:10.1007/s40477-013-0054-5 Robinson, P., White, L. M. (2002). Soft-tissue and osseous impingement syndromes of the ankle: role of imaging in diagnosis and management. Radiographics, 22(6), 1457-1469; discussion 70-1. doi:10.1148/rg.226025034 Stieda, L. (1869). Ueber secundäre Fusswurzelknochen. Arch Anat Physiol., 36, 108-111. Tokgöz, M. A., Ataoğlu, M. B., Ergişi, Y., Bozkurt, H. H., Kanatlı, U. (2020). Is there any effect of presence and size of os trigonum on flexor hallucis longus tendon lesions? Foot Ankle Surg, 26(4), 469-472. doi:10.1016/j.fas.2019.05.018 Uygur, E., Aktaş, B., Öz, T. T., Erinç, S., Koç, M. (2016). Prevalence of accessory bones of the foot in Turkish patients. JAREM, 6(3), 147-151. doi:10.5152/jarem.2016.1085 Wong, G. N. L., Tan, T. J. (2016). MR imaging as a problem solving tool in posterior ankle pain: A review. Eur J Radiol, 85(12), 2238-2256. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.10.016 Yasui, Y., Hannon, C. P., Hurley, E., Kennedy, J. G. (2016). Posterior ankle impingement syndrome: A systematic four-stage approach. World J Orthop, 7(10), 657-663. doi:10.5312/wjo.v7.i10.657 Zwiers, R., Baltes, T. P. A., Opdam, K. T. M., Wiegerinck, J. I., van Dijk, C. N. (2018). Prevalence of Os Trigonum on CT Imaging. Foot Ankle Int, 39(3), 338-342. doi:10.1177/1071100717740937