BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

A Pretest to Differentiate Between Weak and Nearly-Weak Instrument Asymptotics

Yıl 2011, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2, 13 - 21, 01.12.2011

Öz

We propose a pretest, bootstrap Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, to differentiate between weak and nearly-weak asymptotics. This is based on bootstrapping Wald Continuous Updating Estimator (CUE) based test. Since Wald CUE test has different limits under weak and nearly-weak cases this can be used in a pretest. We also conduct some simulations and show that some of the asset pricing models conform to nearly-weak asymptotics.

Kaynakça

  • Anderson, T.W. and H. Rubin (1949). Estimation of the Parameters of a Single Equation in a Complete System of Stochastic Equations. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 20, 46-63.
  • Andrews, D.W.K. (1994). Empirical Process Methods in Econometrics. Handbook of Econometrics, 4, 2247-2294.
  • Antoine, B. and E. Renault (2007). Efficient GMM with nearly-weak identification. Working paper. Department of Economics, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill.
  • Caner, M. (2010). Testing, Estimation in GMM and CUE with Nearly-Weak IdentiŞcation. Econometric Reviews, 29, 330-363.
  • Hahn, J. and G. Kuersteiner (2002). Discontinuities of Weak Instrument Limiting Distributions. Economics Letters, 75, 325-331.
  • Hall, P. and J.L. Horowitz (1996). Bootstrap critical values for tests based on generalized method of moments estimators. Econometrica, 64, 891-916.
  • Hansen, L.P., J. Heaton and A. Yaron (1996). Finite Sample Properties of Some Alternative GMM Estimators. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 14, 262-280.
  • Kleibergen, F. (2005). Testing Parameters in GMM Without Assuming That They Are IdentiŞed. Econometrica, 73, 1103-1124.
  • Mood, A.M., F.A. Graybill and D.C. Boes (1974). Introduction to the Theory of Statistics. New-York: Mc-Graw Hill.
  • Phillips, P.C.B. and J.Y. Park (1988). On the Formulation of Wald Tests of Nonlinear Restrictions. Econometrica, 56, 1065-1083.
  • Stock, J.H. and J.H. Wright (2000). GMM with Weak Identification. Econometrica, 68, 1055- 1096.
Yıl 2011, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2, 13 - 21, 01.12.2011

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Anderson, T.W. and H. Rubin (1949). Estimation of the Parameters of a Single Equation in a Complete System of Stochastic Equations. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 20, 46-63.
  • Andrews, D.W.K. (1994). Empirical Process Methods in Econometrics. Handbook of Econometrics, 4, 2247-2294.
  • Antoine, B. and E. Renault (2007). Efficient GMM with nearly-weak identification. Working paper. Department of Economics, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill.
  • Caner, M. (2010). Testing, Estimation in GMM and CUE with Nearly-Weak IdentiŞcation. Econometric Reviews, 29, 330-363.
  • Hahn, J. and G. Kuersteiner (2002). Discontinuities of Weak Instrument Limiting Distributions. Economics Letters, 75, 325-331.
  • Hall, P. and J.L. Horowitz (1996). Bootstrap critical values for tests based on generalized method of moments estimators. Econometrica, 64, 891-916.
  • Hansen, L.P., J. Heaton and A. Yaron (1996). Finite Sample Properties of Some Alternative GMM Estimators. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 14, 262-280.
  • Kleibergen, F. (2005). Testing Parameters in GMM Without Assuming That They Are IdentiŞed. Econometrica, 73, 1103-1124.
  • Mood, A.M., F.A. Graybill and D.C. Boes (1974). Introduction to the Theory of Statistics. New-York: Mc-Graw Hill.
  • Phillips, P.C.B. and J.Y. Park (1988). On the Formulation of Wald Tests of Nonlinear Restrictions. Econometrica, 56, 1065-1083.
  • Stock, J.H. and J.H. Wright (2000). GMM with Weak Identification. Econometrica, 68, 1055- 1096.
Toplam 11 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Diğer ID JA74KC83VM
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Mehmet Caner Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Aralık 2011
Gönderilme Tarihi 1 Aralık 2011
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2011 Cilt: 3 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Caner, M. (2011). A Pretest to Differentiate Between Weak and Nearly-Weak Instrument Asymptotics. International Econometric Review, 3(2), 13-21.
AMA Caner M. A Pretest to Differentiate Between Weak and Nearly-Weak Instrument Asymptotics. IER. Aralık 2011;3(2):13-21.
Chicago Caner, Mehmet. “A Pretest to Differentiate Between Weak and Nearly-Weak Instrument Asymptotics”. International Econometric Review 3, sy. 2 (Aralık 2011): 13-21.
EndNote Caner M (01 Aralık 2011) A Pretest to Differentiate Between Weak and Nearly-Weak Instrument Asymptotics. International Econometric Review 3 2 13–21.
IEEE M. Caner, “A Pretest to Differentiate Between Weak and Nearly-Weak Instrument Asymptotics”, IER, c. 3, sy. 2, ss. 13–21, 2011.
ISNAD Caner, Mehmet. “A Pretest to Differentiate Between Weak and Nearly-Weak Instrument Asymptotics”. International Econometric Review 3/2 (Aralık 2011), 13-21.
JAMA Caner M. A Pretest to Differentiate Between Weak and Nearly-Weak Instrument Asymptotics. IER. 2011;3:13–21.
MLA Caner, Mehmet. “A Pretest to Differentiate Between Weak and Nearly-Weak Instrument Asymptotics”. International Econometric Review, c. 3, sy. 2, 2011, ss. 13-21.
Vancouver Caner M. A Pretest to Differentiate Between Weak and Nearly-Weak Instrument Asymptotics. IER. 2011;3(2):13-21.