Growth and yield performance of upland rice (Oryza sativa L. var. zambales) intercropped with mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) and peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1, 34 - 41, 23.06.2020

Jade Papong , Ulysses Cagasan

Öz

One way of increasing productivity per unit area per unit time is through intercropping. This study aimed to evaluate the growth and yield performance of upland rice intercropped with mungbean and peanut, determine the appropriate intercrop that would give optimum yield of upland rice, and assess the profitability of upland rice production intercropped with mungbean and peanut. The experiment was laid out in a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replications. The treatments were designated as follows: T0 = monoculture upland rice, T1 = Upland rice + Mungbean var. Lg Mg 28–6–0, T2 = Upland rice + Mungbean var. Pag–asa 7, T3 = Upland rice + Peanut var. CVRC Pn 2011–002, and T4 = Upland rice + Peanut var. Pn 06–34–3a. Results showed that intercropping upland rice var. Zambales with mungbean and peanut significantly affected the number of days from sowing to heading, days from sowing to maturity, leaf area index, fresh straw yield (t ha-1), number of unfilled grains per panicle, and weight of grains per 0.50 linear meter. Monoculture upland rice (T0) matured earlier and had the highest leaf area index and straw yield. Upland rice with peanut var. CVRC Pn 2011–002 (T3) had more unfilled grains and higher weight of grains per 0.50 square meter, while upland rice with peanut var. CVRC Pn 2011–002 (T4) had the highest LER value of 1.30 and ATER value of 1.93. Highest rice grain yield of 2.8 t ha-1 and highest gross margin of PhP 106,757.02 ha-1 were obtained from upland rice with peanut var. CVRC Pn 2011–002 (T4), while lowest gross margin of PhP 13,727.14 ha-1 was obtained from the upland rice monoculture (T0).

Anahtar Kelimeler

Intercropping scheme, crop productivity, area time equivalent ratio

Kaynakça

• Alcober, E. L. M. D. Ratilla, O. B. Capuno and J. S. ValenzonA. 2014. Evaluation of different cropping systems for marginal uplands in Inopacan, Leyte. Visayas State University Visca, Baybay City, Leyte. Annals of Tropical Research, 36 (Supplement):124-138.
• Al-Dalain, S. A. 2009. Effect of intercropping of zea maize with potato Solanum tuberosum, L. on potato growth and on the productivity and land equivalent ratio of potato and zea maize. Agric. J., 4: 164-170.
• Aguelo, G. C. 2003. Spatial arrangement of sorghum-peanut combination under intercropping scheme. Undergrad Thesis. LSU, Visca, Baybay City, Leyte. 23 pp.
• Hiebsch, C. K. 2017. Principles of intercropping: effect of nitrogen fertilization, plant population and crop duration on equivalency ratio in interculture vs monoculture, Ph.D. Thesis, North Carolina. 28-30 pp.
• Jagadish, S. V. K., J. Cairns, R. Lafitte, T. R. Wheeler, A. H. Price, and P.Q. Craufurd. 2010. Genetics analysis of heat tolerance at anthesis in rice. Crop Sci. 50:1627-1641.
• Jensen, E.S. 2001. Grain yield, symbiotic N2 fixation and interspecific competition for inorganic N in pea-barley intercrops. Plant and Soil, 182: 25-38.
• Kumar, V. and J. K. Ladha. 2011. Direct seedling of rice: Recent development and future research needs. Adv. Agron. 111:297-413.
• Landon, J. R. 1991. Booker Tropical Soil Manual. Longman Scientific and Technical/Booker Tate, Harlou. pp 478.
• Lawrence, H. And T. Gohain. 2011. Intercropping of Mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) with upland rice (Oryza sativa L.) under Rainfed Condition of Nagaland. Indian Jour. of Agri. Farming, 24 (2). pp. 25-28.
• Lithourgidis, S. A. and M. D. Yiakoulaki. 2006. Forage yield and quality of common vetch mixtures with oat and triticate in tow seedling ratios. Field Crops Res. 99: 106-113.
• Mandal, K. M. 2014. Evaluation of Cereal-Legume Intercropping Systems through Productivity and Competition Ability. Asian Journal of Science and Technology, 5 (3): pp. 233-237.
• PCARR, 1980. Standard Methods of Analysis for Soil, Plant Tissues, Water and Fertilizer. Philippine Council for Agriculture and Research. Los Baños, Laguna, Philippines. 164 pp.
• Szumigalski, A.R. and R.C. Van-Acker, 2008. Intercropping: Land equivalent ratios, light interception, and water use in annual intercrops in the presence or absence of in-crop herbicides. American Agronomy Journal, 100:1145-1154.
• Tejada, S.Q. R.B. Carating, J. Manguera, I. Samalca, and L.R. Retamar. 2008. Land degradation and desertification in the Philippines. Accessed on 04 September 4, 2018 http.fao.org/nr/lada/index.php.
• Tosas, D. M. 1988. Performance of sweet corn at varying time of mungbean intercropping. Undergrad thesis. LSU, VISCA, Baybay Leyte. 20 pp.
• Tsubo, M., S. Walker and H.O. Ogindo. 2005. A simulation model of cereal–legume intercropping systems for semi-arid regions. II. Model application. Field Crops Res.