Analysis of Suspension System for 3D Printed Mobile Robot

Abstract

In this study, 3D printed mobile robot with suspension system was analysed using Computer Aided Engineering (CAE) methods. Spring and damping coefficients of the suspension system were determined. Structural and dynamic analyses were conducted after the selection of appropriate spring and damping coefficients to find structural strength and power requirement of mobile robot. The length of robot and the number of wheels were decreased to one third of the real to ease the analysis. A concrete road with the length of 1,000 mm and 10° inclination was created as ground to simulate the real world. Obstacles with the height of 80 mm were placed on different locations on the path of the wheels for the robot. The designed suspension system was consisted of; two dashpots connected to wheels and body through connection components and a spring between two wheels to ensure the stability. Polylactic acid (PLA) was used as body material.  In the structural part; the strength of the robot body and critical part (suspension leg) was computed by Finite Element Analysis (FEA). Safety factor values for body and critical component were found as almost 7 and 4, respectively. The results from the analysed indicated that maximum equivalent stresses and strains (for body = 3.4 MPa,  = 3 e-3 mm/mm and for critical component= 6.5 MPa,  = 6 e-3 mm/mm) were occurred while robot was passing the obstacles.  In dynamic analysis; robot was driven with three different speeds (0.25, 0.5 and 1 metre per second) on the same road conditions.  The motor torque and force values, suspension system results (force and elongation), angular velocity of the wheels and power requirement of mobile robot were calculated. The results showed the power requirement of robot was 70 Watt when it was driven with maximum velocity. 

Keywords

• Computer Aided Engineering,Finite Element Analysis,Polylactic Acid,Suspension System,3D Printed Mobile Robot

References

1. [6] J. G. Gomez, A. V. Gomez, A. P. Moreno and M. Abderrahim. “A new open source 3D-printable mobile robotic platform for education”. In Advances in autonomous mini robots (pp. 49-62). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012.
2. [7] F. Cruz, S. Lanza, H. Boudaoud, S. Hoppe and M. Camargo. “Polymer Recycling and Additive Manufacturing in an Open Source context: Optimization of processes and methods”.
3. [8] R. S. Madani, E. Baines, A. Moroz and B. Makled. “Evaluation of Suitability of Rapid Prototyping Techniques for Use by Children Evaluation”, 2015.
4. [9] B. D. Harris, S. Nilsson, and C. M. Poole. “A feasibility study for using ABS plastic and a low-cost 3D printer for patient-specific brachytherapy mould design”. Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine, 38(3), 399-412, 2015.
5. [10] Kalpakjian and S. R. Schmid. “Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials–5th Edition”. Agenda, 12, 1, 2014.
6. J. G. Gomez, A. V. Gomez, A. P. Moreno and M. Abderrahim. “A new open source 3D-printable mobile robotic platform for education”. In Advances in autonomous mini robots (pp. 49-62). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012.
7. F. Cruz, S. Lanza, H. Boudaoud, S. Hoppe and M. Camargo. “Polymer Recycling and Additive Manufacturing in an Open Source context: Optimization of processes and methods”.
8. R. S. Madani, E. Baines, A. Moroz and B. Makled. “Evaluation of Suitability of Rapid Prototyping Techniques for Use by Children Evaluation”, 2015.

9. B. D. Harris, S. Nilsson, and C. M. Poole. “A feasibility study for using ABS plastic and a low-cost 3D printer for patient-specific brachytherapy mould design”. Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine, 38(3), 399-412, 2015.
10. Kalpakjian and S. R. Schmid. “Manufacturing Processes for Engineering Materials–5th Edition”. Agenda, 12, 1, 2014.