A discussion on design fires for high-speed railway train cars

Abstract

High-speed rail systems are expanding everywhere for carrying thousands of passen-gers every day. Train cars in underground spaces travel under dense urban areas, tun-nels in mountainous places and bridges across rivers. Design fire in burning a train car should be studied carefully for fire hazard assessment in those long underground or en-closed spaces. There are full-scale burning testing results on the main combustibles in-cluding seat, curtain and passenger luggage in some train cars. The heat release rate of a high-speed train car model CRH1 will be studied using such data together with a two-layer fire zone model, the Consolidated Model of Fire and Smoke Transport (CFAST). Simulation will be performed on the full-sized train car with the heat release rate of the seat measured by experiment. Two fire scenarios with ignition points located in the front and rear areas of the train compartment are considered. The results of the fire simulations show that the heat release rate can reach 43 MW. The value is similar to the full-scale burning experiments on train cars in Sweden and South Korea. Active fire protection systems have to be seriously considered in those underground or enclosed areas.

Keywords

• High-speed railway
• Train car fires
• Fire hazard assessment
• Design fires

References

1. Reference1 Lo TY. Reactivating high-speed railway systems between Singapore and Laos. Yazhou Zhoukan, 2022; Issue 50, Cover Feature (In Chinese).
2. Reference2 Chow WK. Several points on fire hazards of high speed railway systems. Keynote speech, 9th International Conference on Fire Science and Fire Protection Engineering, Chengdu, China, 18-20 October 2019.
3. Reference3 Chow WK. Several points to watch on fire hazards of railway systems. The 4th Workshop on Railway Operation for Safety and Reliability (Special session of IEEE Global Reliability and Prognostics & Health Management Conference, PHM-2020, 16-18 October 2020, Shanghai, China), Organized by City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 17 October 2020.
4. Reference4 Pardhi S, Deshmukh A, Ajrouche H. Modelling and simulation of detailed vehicle dynamics for development of innovative powertrains. Int J Automot Sci Technol. 2021; 5(3), 244-253.
5. Reference5 Qu L, Chow WK. Common practices in fire hazard assessment for underground transport stations. Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 2013; 38, 377-384.
6. Reference6 White N, Dowling VP. Conducting a full-scale experiment on a rail passenger car. 6th Asia-Oceania Symposium on Fire Science and Technology, 17-20 March, 2004, Daegu, Korea.
7. Reference7 Lattimer B, Beyler C. Heat release rates of fully-developed fires in railcars. Fire Safety Science – Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium, 2005, pp. 1169-1180.
8. Reference8 Dowling VP, White N, Webb AK, Barnett JR. When a passenger train burns, how big is the fire? Proceedings of the 7th Asia-Oceania Symposium on Fire Science and Technology, pp. 19-28, Hong Kong, September 2007.

9. Reference9 Chow WK. Safety to watch in crowded railway systems. Asia-Oceania SFPE Chapters Conference, Jakarta, Indonesia, 29 May 2015.
10. Reference10 White N. Fire performance of passenger trains. Fire Australia, 1 January 2017.
11. Reference11 Ingason H. Model scale railcar fire tests. Fire Saf. J. 2007; 42, 271-282.
12. Reference12 Ko YJ, Michels R, Hadjisophocleous GV. Instrumentation design for HRR measurements in a large-scale fire facility. Fire Technol. 2011; 47, 1047-1061.
13. Reference13 Schebel K, Meacham BJ, Dembsey NA, Johann M, Tubbs J, Alston J. Fire growth simulation in passenger rail vehicles using a simplified flame spread model for integration with CFD analysis. J Fire Protect Eng. 2012; 22(3), 197-225.
14. Reference14 Lönnermark A, Claesson A, Lindström J, Li YZ, Kumm M, Ingason H. Full-scale fire tests with a commuter train in a tunnel. SP Technical Research Institute of Sweden, SP Report: 2012.05.
15. Reference15 Capote JA, Jimenez JA, Alvear D, Alvarez J, Abreu O, Lazaro M. Assessment of fire behaviour of high-speed trains’ interior materials: small-scale and full-scale fire tests. Fire Mater. 2014; 38, 725-743.
16. Reference16 Zicherman J, Lautenberger C, Wolski A. Challenges in establishing design fires for passenger rail vehicles. Fire and Materials 2015 Conference, 2-4 February 2015, San Francisco, USA.
17. Reference17 Lee D, Park WH, Hwang JH, Hadjisophocleous G. Full-scale fire test of an intercity train car. Fire Technol. 2016; 52(5), 1559-1574.
18. Reference18 Chen JM, Yao XL, Yan G, Guo XH. Comparative study on heat release rate of high-speed passenger train compartments. J Procedia Eng. 2014; 71, 107-113.
19. Reference19 Zhu J, Li XJ, Cheng FM. Combustion performance of flame-ignited high-speed train curtains via full-scale tests. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2015; Issue 2, 257-263.
20. Reference20 Li ZG, Li ZQ, Liu WM. Study on the calculation methods of high-speed train heat release rate. Railway Locomotive and Car, 2018; 01-0015-04. (In Chinese)
21. Reference21 Peacock RD. CFAST Volume 4: Software Quality Assurance. National Institute of Standards and Technology, USA, 2018.
22. Reference22 Peacock RD, McGrattan K.B, Forney GP, Reneke PA. CFAST Volume 1: Technical Reference Guide. National Institute of Standards and Technology, USA, 2018.
23. Reference23 Peacock RD, Reneke PA, Forney GP. CFAST Volume 2: User’s Guide. National Institute of Standards and Technology, USA, 2018.
24. Reference24 Peacock RD, Reneke PA, Forney GP. CFAST Volume 3: Verification and Validation Guide. National Institute of Standards and Technology, USA, 2018.
25. Reference25 McGrattan K, Hostikka S, McDermott R, Floyd J, Weinschenk C, Overholt K. Fire Dynamics Simulator, User’s Guide. NIST Special Publication 1019, Sixth Edition. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA, and VTT Technical Research Center of Finland, Espoo, Finland, November 2013.
26. Reference26 Huang X, Ren Z, Zhu H, Peng L, Cheng CH, Chow WK. A modified zone model on vertical cable tray fire in a confined compartment in the nuclear power plant. J Fire Sci.2018; 36(6), 472-493.
27. Reference27 Bettelini M. Systems approach to underground safety. Underground Space, 2020; 5(3), 258-266.
28. Reference28 Guo Y, Yuan Z, Yuan Y, Cao X, Zhao P. Numerical simulation of smoke stratification in tunnel fires under longitudinal velocities. Underground Space, 2021; 6(2), 163-172.
29. Reference29 Kallianiotis A, Papakonstantinou D, Tolias IC, Benardos A. Evaluation of fire smoke control in underground space, Evaluation of fire smoke control in underground space. Underground Space, Available online 27 September 2021.
30. Reference30 Li J, Li YF, Bi Q, Li Y, Chow WK, Cheng CH, To CW, Chow CL. Performance evaluation on fixed water-based firefighting system in suppressing large fire in urban tunnels. Tunnelling Underground Space Technol. 2019; 84, 56-69.
31. Reference31 Chow WK, Han SS. Heat release rate calculation in oxygen consumption calorimetry. J Appl Therm Eng. 2011; 31, 304-310.
32. Reference32 Fleury R, Spearpoint M, Fleischmann C. Evaluation of thermal radiation models for fire spread between objects. University of Canterbury, Department of Civil and Natural Resources Engineering, 2010.
33. Reference33 Noordijk L, Lemaire T. Modelling of fire spread in car parks. HERON, 2005; 50(4), 209-218.
34. Reference34 National Fire Protection Association. NFPA 921, Guide for Fire and Explosion Investigations, National Fire Protection Association, USA, 2004.
35. Reference35 Chen JM, Yao XL, Li SP. Study on the influence of ventilation condition on the heat release rate of the CRH passenger rail car. J Procedia Eng. 2013; 62, 1050-1056.
36. Reference36 Lönnermark A, Ingason H. Fire spread between industry premises. Fire Safety Science – Proceedings of the 10th IAFSS Symposium, 2011; pp. 1305-1317.