Performance Analysis of Geometric Properties of Fuel Cell Components

Abstract

Due to factors including low emission values, great energy efficiency, and reduced environmental contamination, fuel cells have gained popularity recently. Fuel cells using polymer electrolyte membranes can distribute reactant gases through gas flow channels and remove water that forms during the reaction from the fuel cell. This study looked at how different channel sizes and channel cross-section geometries (rectangular, triangular, and semicircular) affected the distribution of current density, oxygen concentration, velocity, and temperature parameters on the cathode catalyst in the flow channels of a single-channel PEM fuel cell at 0.75 V cell voltage. The model with the highest current density and consequently the best fuel cell performance was determined to be 9 x 10-5 A/cm2 in a channel with a height and breadth of 0.1 cm and A = 1 cm2, according to the data obtained. The flow channel length was assessed at 0.2 in the analysis results for all models because it did not alter with the oxygen concentration distribution. In varied channel designs with the same area, it has been found that the velocity distribution varies inversely with the current density. The maximum velocity value recorded at this location was 33.1 m/s in a semicircular canal with a R of 0.34 mm. It has been discovered that fuel cells from more places operate better as a result.

Keywords

• PEM fuel cells
• Fuel cell performance
• channel section geometry

References

1. Hamrang A, Abdollahzadeh M, Bilondi AM, Bagherighajari F, Rahgoshay SM, Pascoa JC. Comparison of PEMFC performance with parallel serpentine and parallel serpentine-baffled flow fields under various operating and geometrical conditions; a parametric study. Int J Hydrog Energy 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.11.122.
2. Huang H, Li X, Li S, Guo X, Liu M, Wang T, et al. Evaluating the effect of refined flow channels in a developed biomimetic flow field on PEMFC performance. Energy 2023;266:126442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.126442.
3. Marwaha A, Subramani̇An KA. Experimental Investigation of Frictional Power Apportionment of Moving Parts in a Hydrogen fuelled Multi-cylinder Spark Ignition Engine. Int J Automot Sci Technol 2022. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech..999354.
4. Özdemi̇R SN, Taymaz İ. A CFD Modeling Study Based on Relative Humidity Effect on PEMFC Performance. Int J Automot Sci Technol 2021:192–8. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech..931807.
5. Li WZ, Yang WW, Zhang WY, Qu ZG, He YL. Three-dimensional modeling of a PEMFC with serpentine flow field incorporating the impacts of electrode inhomogeneous compression deformation. Int J Hydrog Energy 2019;44:22194–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.06.187.
6. Types of Fuel Cells. EnergyGov n.d. https://www.energy.gov/eere/fuelcells/types-fuel-cells (accessed January 11, 2023). Chu T, Xie M, Yu Y, Wang B, Yang D, Li B, et al. Experimental study of the influence of dynamic load cycle and operating parameters on the durability of PEMFC. Energy 2022;239:122356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.122356.
7. Hamrang A, Abdollahzadeh M, Kermani MJ, Rahgoshay SM. Numerical simulation of the PEM fuel cell performance enhancement by various blockage arrangement of the cathode serpentine gas flow channel outlets/inlets. Int J Heat Mass Transf 2022;186:122475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2021.122475.
8. Rašić D, Katrašnik T. Multi-domain and Multi-scale model of a fuel cell electric vehicle to predict the effect of the operating conditions and component sizing on fuel cell degradation. Energy Convers Manag 2022;268:116024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2022.116024.

9. Xia Z, Chen H, Shan W, Zhang R, Zhang T, Pei P. Behavior of current distribution evolution under reactant starvation conditions based on a single polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) with triple-serpentine flow field: An experimental study. Int J Hydrog Energy 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.12.187.
10. Min C, Li F, Gao X, Wang K, Rao Z. Secondary flow on the performance of PEMFC with blocks in the serpentine flow field. Int J Hydrog Energy 2022;47:28945–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.06.191.
11. Omeiri D, Laouar A. Three Dimensional Simulations of Transport Phenomena in a Single Phase Isothermal Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell. Procedia Comput Sci 2018;130:736–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.04.128.
12. Berning T, Lu DM, Djilali N. Three-dimensional computational analysis of transport phenomena in a PEM fuel cell. J Power Sources 2002;106:284–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7753(01)01057-6.
13. Ionescu V, Buzbuchi N. PEMFC Two-dimensional FEM Model to Study the Effects of Gas Flow Channels Geometry on Reactant Species Transport. Energy Procedia 2017;112:390–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1085.
14. Eker E, Taymaz I. Analysis Of The Effect Of Flow Channel Width On The Performance Of PEMFC. SAÜ Fen Bilim Enstitüsü Derg 2013;17:195–200. https://doi.org/10.5505/saufbe.2013.77598.
15. Cooper NJ, Santamaria AD, Becton MK, Park JW. Investigation of the performance improvement in decreasing aspect ratio interdigitated flow field PEMFCs. Energy Convers Manag 2017;136:307–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.01.005.
16. Ahmadi N, Dadvand A, Rezazadeh S, Mirzaee I. Analysis of the operating pressure and GDL geometrical configuration effect on PEM fuel cell performance. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 2016;38:2311–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-016-0548-0.
17. Siegel C. Review of computational heat and mass transfer modeling in polymer-electrolyte-membrane (PEM) fuel cells. Energy 2008;33:1331–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2008.04.015.
18. Tan Q, Lei H, Liu Z. Numerical simulation analysis of the performance on the PEMFC with a new flow field designed based on constructal-theory. Int J Hydrog Energy 2022;47:11975–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.01.243.
19. Cao Y, Ayed H, Jafarmadar S, Abdollahi MAA, Farag A, Wae-hayee M, et al. PEM fuel cell cathode-side flow field design optimization based on multi-criteria analysis of liquid-slug dynamics. J Ind Eng Chem 2021;98:397–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2021.03.024.
20. PEM YAKIT HÜCRESİ MODELİ n.d. http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:ucDgiSc5u1sJ:www1.mmo.org.tr/resimler/dosya_ekler/9df81bd80314ec3_ek.pdf%3Fdergi%3D1491&cd=1&hl=tr&ct=clnk&gl=tr (accessed January 11, 2023).
21. Ghasabehi M, Jabbary A, Shams M. Cathode side transport phenomena investigation and Multi-Objective optimization of a tapered parallel flow field PEMFC. Energy Convers Manag 2022;265:115761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115761.
22. Vazifeshenas Y, Sedighi K, Shakeri M. Numerical investigation of a novel compound flow-field for PEMFC performance improvement. Int J Hydrog Energy 2015;40:15032–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.08.077.