Research Article

A Comparative Study of Two Differet MPC Controllers Integrated With MHE

Volume: 9 Number: 4 December 31, 2025

A Comparative Study of Two Differet MPC Controllers Integrated With MHE

Abstract

In Executing aggressive maneuvers, such as the Double Lane Change (DLC), presents a significant challenge for autonomous vehicle control, particularly when dealing with highly non-linear vehicle dynamics. This paper proposes a novel path-following and planning approach based on a comparative analysis of two distinct Nonlinear Model Predictive Control (NMPC) architectures. Developed using the CasADi framework within the MATLAB environment, the controllers are applied to a high-fidelity 8-Degree-of-Freedom (8-DOF) vehicle model, solved via the ode45 function. To ensure practical robustness against sensor noise, the control loop is integrated with a Moving Horizon Estimator (MHE), which significantly enhances the accuracy of state estimation during operation. The first control architecture implements a kinematic model, defining states by vehicle position and yaw angle to control wheel rotation speeds and steering. In comparison, the second architecture utilizes a comprehensive dynamic model that incorporates higher-order states, such as yaw rate and side-slip angle, with control inputs for independent front steering angles. We rigorously evaluated both controllers across a wide spectrum of longitudinal speeds and varying road surface conditions. The results assess the capability of each system to track predefined trajectories while strictly satisfying state and control constraints, ultimately clarifying the specific trade-offs between computational simplicity and the dynamic stability required for high-speed tracking tasks.

Keywords

References

  1. [1] Vivacqua RPD, Bertozzi M, Cerri P, Martins FN, Vassallo RF. Self-localization based on visual lane marking maps: an accurate low cost approach for autonomous driving. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst.2018;19(2):582-97. http://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2017.2752461
  2. [2] Li X, Sun Z, Cao D, He Z, Zhu Q. Real-time trajectory planning for autonomous urban driving: framework, algorithms, and verifi-cations. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatronics. 2016;21(2):740-53. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMECH.2015.2493980
  3. [3] Dekker L. Industrial-scale autonomous vehicle path following by feedback Linearized iterative learning control [master's thesis]. Kingston (ON): Queen's University; 2018.
  4. [4] Mehrez MW, Mann GKI, Gosine RG. Nonlinear moving horizon state estimation for multi-robot relative localization. In: Proceed-ings of the 2014 IEEE 27th Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (CCECE); 2014 May 4-7; Toronto, ON. 2014. p. 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1109/CCECE.2014.6901134
  5. [5] Yao Q, Tian Y, Wang Q, Wang S. Control strategies on path tracking for autonomous vehicle: state of the art and future chal-lenges. IEEE Access. 2020;8: 161211-161222. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3020075
  6. [6] Eroğlu M, Koç MA, Kozan R, Esen İ. Comparative analysis of full car model with driver using PID and LQR controllers. IJASTECH. 2022;6(2):178-8. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech..1076443.
  7. [7] Liu H, Sun J, Cheng KWE. A two-layer model predictive path-tracking control with curvature adaptive method for high-speed autonomous driving. IEEE Access. 2023;11: 89228 _ 89239. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3306239
  8. [8] Zhang K, Sprinkle J, Sanfelice RG. Computationally aware con-trol of autonomous vehicles: a hybrid model predictive control ap-proach. Autonomous Robots. 2015;39:503-517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10514-015-9469-5

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Automotive Mechatronics and Autonomous Systems

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

December 31, 2025

Submission Date

February 1, 2025

Acceptance Date

July 24, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 9 Number: 4

APA
Mohamed, M., Maged, S., & Abdelwahab, M. (2025). A Comparative Study of Two Differet MPC Controllers Integrated With MHE. International Journal of Automotive Science And Technology, 9(4), 637-656. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech..1631384
AMA
1.Mohamed M, Maged S, Abdelwahab M. A Comparative Study of Two Differet MPC Controllers Integrated With MHE. IJASTECH. 2025;9(4):637-656. doi:10.30939/ijastech.1631384
Chicago
Mohamed, Mostafa, Shady Maged, and Mohamed Abdelwahab. 2025. “A Comparative Study of Two Differet MPC Controllers Integrated With MHE”. International Journal of Automotive Science And Technology 9 (4): 637-56. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech. 1631384.
EndNote
Mohamed M, Maged S, Abdelwahab M (December 1, 2025) A Comparative Study of Two Differet MPC Controllers Integrated With MHE. International Journal of Automotive Science And Technology 9 4 637–656.
IEEE
[1]M. Mohamed, S. Maged, and M. Abdelwahab, “A Comparative Study of Two Differet MPC Controllers Integrated With MHE”, IJASTECH, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 637–656, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.30939/ijastech..1631384.
ISNAD
Mohamed, Mostafa - Maged, Shady - Abdelwahab, Mohamed. “A Comparative Study of Two Differet MPC Controllers Integrated With MHE”. International Journal of Automotive Science And Technology 9/4 (December 1, 2025): 637-656. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech. 1631384.
JAMA
1.Mohamed M, Maged S, Abdelwahab M. A Comparative Study of Two Differet MPC Controllers Integrated With MHE. IJASTECH. 2025;9:637–656.
MLA
Mohamed, Mostafa, et al. “A Comparative Study of Two Differet MPC Controllers Integrated With MHE”. International Journal of Automotive Science And Technology, vol. 9, no. 4, Dec. 2025, pp. 637-56, doi:10.30939/ijastech. 1631384.
Vancouver
1.Mostafa Mohamed, Shady Maged, Mohamed Abdelwahab. A Comparative Study of Two Differet MPC Controllers Integrated With MHE. IJASTECH. 2025 Dec. 1;9(4):637-56. doi:10.30939/ijastech. 1631384


International Journal of Automotive Science and Technology (IJASTECH) is published by Society of Automotive Engineers Turkey

by.png