Optimal Design of Automobile Suspension Control Arm Using Metaheuristic Algorithms

Year 2025, Volume: 9 Issue: 3, 305 - 309, 30.09.2025

Dildar Gürses

https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech..1749077

Cited By: 3

Abstract

Suspension systems in automobiles are composed of several key components, including control arms, springs, dampers, and stabilizer bars, all of which contribute to vehicle stability, ride comfort, and handling performance. Among these, the control arm is a critical structural element that connects the wheel hub to the chassis, allowing for controlled motion and load transfer. In this research, an advanced optimization methodology was employed to enhance the design of a control arm by reducing its weight without compromising its mechanical integrity. Both topology optimization and shape optimization techniques were applied to achieve a lightweight yet structurally robust design. To perform the optimization process effectively, the recently proposed Geyser Inspired Optimizer (GIO), a novel metaheuristic algorithm introduced in the literature, was utilized due to its superior exploration and exploitation capabilities. The primary objective was to minimize the mass of the control arm while strictly satisfying predefined stress constraints under operational loading conditions.
In order to formulate accurate objective and constraint functions, Latin Hypercube Sampling (LHS) was used to generate a diverse set of design points. A surrogate modelling strategy based on the Radial Basis Function (RBF) was then employed to approximate the response surfaces, thereby reducing the computational cost of the optimization process. The optimal design obtained through this integrated approach successfully fulfilled all design constraints and achieved a 14.71% reduction in weight compared to the initial design. These promising results validate the efficiency and reliability of the proposed method and highlight its potential applicability in lightweight structural optimization of automotive components.

Keywords

Geyser optimization algorithm , Radial basis functions , Design , Suspension control arm , Shape optimization

References

• [1] Nassar, M., Polat, K., Koçlu, Y., Topaç, M. M. Design and Optimisation of a Double Wishbone Independent Suspension System for an L6 Electric Vehicle: A Response Surface Methodology Based Design Application. Engineering Perspective, 2025; 4(1), 21-30. doi:10.29228/eng.pers.79569
• [2] Altin M, Acar E, Güler MA. Crashworthiness optimization of hierarchical hexagonal honeycombs under out-of-plane impact. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci. 2021;235(6):963–74. doi:10.1177/0954406220939104
• [3] Aktaş C, Acar E, Güler MA, Altın M. An investigation of the crashworthiness performance and optimization of tetra-chiral and re-entrant crash boxes. Mech Based Des Struct Mach. 2023;51(12):6881–904. doi:10.1080/15397734.2022.2075382
• [4] Ghasemi M, Zare M, Zahedi A, Akbari MA, Mirjalili S, Abualigah L. Geyser inspired algorithm: a new geological inspired meta-heuristic for real parameter and constrained engineering optimization. J Bionic Eng. 2024;21(1):374–408. doi:10.1007/s42235-023-00419-3
• [5] Abualigah L, Yousri D, Abd Elaziz M, Ewees AA, Al-Qaness MA, Gandomi AH. Aquila optimizer: a novel meta-heuristic optimization algorithm. Comput Ind Eng. 2021;157:107250. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2021.107250
• [6] Agushaka JO, Ezugwu AE, Abualigah L. Dwarf mongoose optimization algorithm. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2022;391:114570. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2021.114570
• [7] Ahmadianfar I, Heidari AA, Noshadian S, Chen H, Gandomi AINFO: An efficient optimization algorithm based on weighted mean of vectors. Expert Syst Appl. 2022;195:116516. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2021.116516
• [8] Anaraki MV, Farzin S. Humboldt Squid Optimization Algorithm (HSOA): A novel nature-inspired technique for solving optimization problems. IEEE Access. 2023;11:122069–115. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3290313
• [9] Sowmya R, Premkumar M, Jangir P. Newton-Raphson-based optimizer: A new population-based metaheuristic algorithm for continuous optimization problems. Eng Appl Artif Intell. 2024;128:107532. doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2023.107532
• [10] Fu Y, Liu D, Chen J, He L. Secretary bird optimization algorithm: a new metaheuristic for solving global optimization problems. Artif Intell Rev. 2024;57(5):1–102. doi:10.1007/s10462-023-10524-9
• [11] Ouyang K, Fu S, Chen Y, Cai Q, Heidari AA, Chen H. Escape: an optimization method based on crowd evacuation behaviors. Artif Intell Rev. 2024;58(1):19. doi:10.1007/s10462-023-10566-z
• [12] Song XG, Jung JH, Son HJ. Metamodel-based optimization of a control arm considering strength and durability performance. Comput Math Appl. 2010;60(4):976–80. doi:10.1016/j.camwa.2010.03.019
• [13] Viqaruddin M, Reddy DR. Structural optimization of control arm for weight reduction and improved performance. Mater Today Proc. 2017;4:9230–6. doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2017.07.282
• [14] Demli UÖ, Acar E. Design optimization of armored wheeled vehicle suspension lower control arm. Mater Test. 2022;64(7):932–44. doi:10.1515/mt-2021-2154
• [15] Fang H, Rais-Rohani M, Liu Z. A comparative study of meta-modeling methods for multiobjective crashworthiness optimization. Comput Struct. 2005;83(25–26):2121–36. doi:10.1016/j.compstruc.2005.02.025