Sustainable Transportation and Environmental Quality in Germany: Quantitative Evidence on the Role of International Logistics, Trade, and Investment

İpek Gürsoy; Sefa Özbek

doi:10.30939/ijastech..1765276

Sustainable Transportation and Environmental Quality in Germany: Quantitative Evidence on the Role of International Logistics, Trade, and Investment

Abstract

Environmental sustainability is a topic of global debate. Environmental degradation, a frequently discussed topic within the context of sustainable development goals, has been frequently discussed in the context of economic growth and energy consumption. However, the impact of the logistics sector on environmental pollution has received relatively limited discussion. This study examines the impact of logistics activities, trade openness, foreign direct investment, and economic growth on environmental degradation. This research, conducted on Germany, a leading country in the logistics field, is expected to fill a gap in the relevant literature. In this study, the stationarity level of the variables logistics, trade openness, foreign direct investment, economic growth, and environmental degradation for the period 1980-2024 was determined using traditional and Fourier-based unit root and stationarity tests. Based on the results, the long-term relationship between the variables was investigated using the A-ARDL cointegration method proposed by Sam et al. (2019). FMOLS and CCR estimation were used as long-term estimators. The DOLS method was used as a robustness test. The A-ARDL cointegration test findings in the study revealed a long-run relationship between the variables logistics, trade openness, foreign direct investment, economic growth, and environmental degradation. In addition to the FMOLS and CCR tests used in coefficient estimation, the DOLS robustness test results are consistent. The results indicate that logistics activities increase environmental pollution. Conversely, increasing trade openness reduces environmental degradation. Furthermore, increased economic growth improves environmental quality. Given that Germany has a strong presence among developed countries, particularly in logistics activities and export-led growth, the findings of this study provide important insights for policy makers.

Keywords

References

[1] Dam M. M., Durmaz A., Bekun F. V., Tiwari A. K. The role of green growth and institutional quality on environmental sus-tainability: A comparison of CO2 emissions, ecological foot-print and inverted load capacity factor for OECD coun-tries, Journal of Environmental Management. 2024;365:121551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121551
[2] Júnior R. C. F., Lima C. P., Viani R. B., da Fonseca A. S. The relationship between innovation ecosystem and bioeconomy: A bibliometric review. International Journal of Innova-tion. 2025;13(2):1-26. https://doi.org/10.5585/2025.26936
[3] Hughes L., Dwivedi Y. K., Misra S. K., Rana N. P., Raghavan V., Akella V. Blockchain research, practice and policy: Appli-cations, benefits, limitations, emerging research themes and re-search agenda. International journal of information management. 2019;49:114-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.02.005
[4] Alharbi T., Abdalrahman A., Mostafa M. H. Data-driven EV charging infrastructure with uncertainty based on a spatial–temporal flow-driven (STFD) models considering batter-ies. Scientific Reports. 2025;15(1):27056. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-12079-3
[5] Li X., Zhu G., Sun J., Wu L., Peng Y. Research on the Coordi-nation of Transportation Network and Ecological Corridors Based on Maxent Model and Circuit Theory in the Giant Panda National Park, China. Land. 2025;14(7):1465. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14071465
[6] Eurostat, 2023. Freight Transport Statistics - Modal Split. Freight transport statistics - modal split - Statistics Explained - Eurostat, Available on the Internet: Freight transport statistics - modal split - Statistics Explained - Eurostat (13.08.2025).
[7] Alarcón F. E., Sauma E., Alias C. The competitiveness of electric trucks in multimodal networks: A case study of integra-tion with inland waterways. Journal of Transport Geography. 2025;126:104252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2025.104252
[8] Rezaei J., van Roekel W. S., Tavasszy L. Measuring the relative importance of the logistics performance index indicators using Best Worst Method. Transport policy. 2018;68:158-169, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.05.007.

[9] Evangelista P., Durst S. Knowledge management in environ-mental sustainability practices of third-party logistics service providers. Vine. 2015;45(4):509-529. https://doi.org/10.1108/VINE-02-2015-0012
[10] He Z., Chen P., Liu H., Guo Z. Performance measurement system and strategies for developing low-carbon logistics: A case study in China. Journal of Cleaner Produc-tion. 2017;156:395-405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.071
[11] Li X., Aghazadeh S., Liaquat M., Nassani A. A., Eweade B. S. Transforming Costa Rica's environmental quality: The role of renewable energy, rule of law, corruption control, and foreign direct investment in building a sustainable future. Renewable Energy. 2025;239:121993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2024.121993
[12] Shahbaz M., Nasreen S., Ahmed K., Hammoudeh S. Trade openness–carbon emissions nexus: the importance of turning points of trade openness for country panels. Energy Econom-ics. 2017;61:221-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.11.008
[13] Yingjun Z., Jahan S., Qamruzzaman M. Technological Inno-vation, Trade Openness, Natural Resources, and Environmental Sustainability in Egypt and Turkey: Evidence from Load Ca-pacity Factor and Inverted Load Capacity Factor with Fourier Functions. Sustainability. 2024;16(19):1-27. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198643
[14] Abdi A. H., Warsame A. A., Sugow M. O., Hussein H. A. Transitioning to sustainable energy and enhanced environmen-tal quality in Somalia through renewable energy, globalisation and trade openness. Scientific Reports. 2025;15(1):6367. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-87819-6
[15] Eyuboglu K., Umut U. How does democracy impact the envi-ronment? An economic and political analysis of load capacity in Egypt. Sustainable Futures. 2025;100860:1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100860
[16] Wan B., Wan W., Hanif N., Ahmed Z. Logistics performance and environmental sustainability: Do green innovation, renew-able energy, and economic globalization matter?. Frontiers in Environmental Science. 2022;996341:1-10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.996341
[17] Cheng, H., Chaudhry, H. R., Kazi, I., & Umar, M. Unlocking greener supply chains: A global innovative perspective on the role of logistics performance in reducing ecological foot-prints. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge. 2024;9(4):1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2024.100612
[18] Abdul Mumin, M., Yakubu I. N., Adam I. O. The synthesis of logistics performance and technological innovation on envi-ronmental quality. Technological Sustainability. 2025;4(1):114-129. https://doi.org/10.1108/TECHS-05-2024-0048
[19] Zheng Z., Xie R., Liu M. Analysis of Carbon Emissions in Guangxi Logistics Industry Based on Environmental Kuznets Model. In Artificial Intelligence, Medical Engineering and Edu-cation. IOS Press. 2025;444-452. doi:10.3233/ATDE250155
[20] Balsalobre-Lorente D., Shahbaz M., Roubaud D., Farhani S. How economic growth, renewable electricity and natural re-sources contribute to CO2 emissions?. Energy poli-cy. 2018;113:356-367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.10.050
[21] Wang L., Akhtar M. J., Khan M. N., Asghar N., ur Rehman H., Xu Y. Assessing the environmental sustainability gap in G20 economies: The roles of economic growth, energy mix, foreign direct investment, and population. Heliyon. 2024;10(4):1-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26535
[22] Ullah S., Luo R., Adebayo T. S., Kartal M. T. Paving the ways toward sustainable development: the asymmetric effect of economic complexity, renewable electricity, and foreign direct investment on the environmental sustainability in BRICS-T. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 2024;26(4):9115-9139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03085-4.
[23] Soto G. H. The effects of foreign direct investment on envi-ronmentally related technologies in Latin America. Resources Policy. 2024;90:1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.104711
[24] Padhan H., Behera D. K., Sahu S. K., Dash, U. Examining the dynamic synthesis between environmental quality, economic globalization, and economic complexity in OECD coun-tries. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 2025;27(2):3777-3795. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-04041-y
[25] Hossain M. S. Panel estimation for CO2 emissions, energy consumption, economic growth, trade openness and urbaniza-tion of newly industrialized countries. Energy policy. 2011;39(11):6991-6999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.07.042
[26] Shahbaz M., Hye Q. M. A., Tiwari A. K., Leitão N. C. Eco-nomic growth, energy consumption, financial development, in-ternational trade and CO2 emissions in Indonesia. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews. 2013;25:109-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.04.009
[27] Usman O., Akadiri S. S., Adeshola I. Role of renewable ener-gy and globalization on ecological footprint in the USA: impli-cations for environmental sustainability. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2020,27(24):30681-30693. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09170-9
[28] Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Trade, 2025. Federal Alman-ya Pazar Bilgileri. Available on the Internet: https://ticaret.gov.tr/data/5ebd2bb913b876cbbc365233/Almanya%20Pazar%20Bilgileri_2025.pdf (09.07.2025)
[29] World Bank, 2023. Logistics Performance Index (LPI). https://lpi.worldbank.org/, Available on the Internet: https://lpi.worldbank.org/ (08.07.2025)
[30] Xuan V. N. Nexus of innovation, renewable energy, FDI, trade openness, and economic growth in Germany: New in-sights from ARDL method. Renewable Energy. 2025;247:1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2025.123060
[31] Dam M. M., Sarkodie S. A. Renewable energy consumption, real income, trade openness, and inverted load capacity factor nexus in Turkiye: Revisiting the EKC hypothesis with envi-ronmental sustainability. Sustainable Horizons. 2023;8: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.horiz.2023.100063
[32] Sun J., Qamruzzaman M. Technological innovation, trade openness, natural resources, clean energy on environmental sustainably: a competitive assessment between CO2 emission, ecological footprint, load capacity factor and inverted load ca-pacity factor in BRICS+ T. Frontiers in Environmental Science. 2025;12:1-23. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2024.1520562
[33] Dam M. M., Işık C., Ongan S. The impacts of renewable en-ergy and institutional quality in environmental sustainability in the context of the sustainable development goals: A novel ap-proach with the inverted load capacity factor. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2023;30(42):95394-95409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-29020-8
[34] Magazzino C., Alola A. A., Schneider N. The trilemma of innovation, logistics performance, and environmental quality in 25 topmost logistics countries: A quantile regression evi-dence. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2021;322:1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129050.
[35] OECD, 2017. ITF Transport Outlook 2017. OECD Publish-ing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789282108000-en.
[36] Shamout M. D. Towards a cleaner and sustainable Europe and Central Asia: An investigation of the logistics‐environment nexus. Sustainable Development. 2024;32(6):6629-6642. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3055
[37] Subramaniam Y. Logistic and environmental quality. Present Environment & Sustainable Development. 2021;15(1):35-48. https://doi.org/10.15551/pesd2021151003
[38] Liu J., Yuan C., Hafeez M., Yuan Q. The relationship between environment and logistics performance: Evidence from Asian countries. Journal of cleaner production. 2018;204: 282-291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.310
[39] Hanafy S. A., Abouelenein M. F., Roushdy N., Ibrahiem D. M., Addai G., Sethi N., Samah R. Key factors in environmental quality: Green finance, energy and trade. Energy Strategy Re-views. 2025;60:1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2025.101800
[40] Managi S., Hibiki,A., Tsurumi T. Does trade openness im-prove environmental quality?. Journal of environmental eco-nomics and management. 2009;58(3):346-363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2009.04.008
[41] Wijethunga A. W. G. C. N., Rahman M. M., Sarker T. Does Financial Development Moderate the relationship between Economic Growth-and Environmental Quality?. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators. 2025;1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2025.100728
[42] Zhu S., Wang T. Y., Xie W. J., Zhou W. X. Revealing intrin-sic communities in the international foreign direct investment networks through their backbones. Chaos, Solitons & Frac-tals. 2025;199:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2025.116766
[43] Li X. I. N. G., Aghazadeh S., Liaquat M., Nassani A. A., Eweade B. S. Transforming Costa Rica's environmental quali-ty: The role of renewable energy, rule of law, corruption con-trol, and foreign direct investment in building a sustainable fu-ture. Renewable Energy. 2025;239:1-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2024.121993
[44] Dogan M., Sahin S., Ullah A., Safi A. Promoting environ-mental sustainability: A policy perspective on hydroelectric power generation, foreign direct investments, and financial de-velopment. Energy. 2024;312:1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2024.133576
[45] Tamazian A., Chousa J. P., Vadlamannati K. C. Does higher economic and financial development lead to environmental deg-radation: evidence from BRIC countries. Energy policy. 2009;37(1):246-253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.08.025.
[46] Yıldırım M., Destek M. A., Manga M. Foreign investments and load capacity factor in BRICS: the moderating role of envi-ronmental policy stringency. Environmental Science and Pollu-tion Research. 2024;31(7):11228-11242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-31814-9.
[47] Caglar A. E., Daştan M., Ahmed Z., Mert M., Avci S. B. A novel panel of European economies pursuing carbon neutrality: Do current climate technology and renewable energy practices really pass through the prism of sustainable develop-ment?. Gondwana Research. 2025;139:260-271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2025.01.001
[48] Adebayo T. S., Pata U. K., Akadiri S. S. A comparison of CO2 emissions, load capacity factor, and ecological footprint for Thailand’s environmental sustainability. Environment, De-velopment and Sustainability. 2024;26(1):2203-2223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02810-9
[49] Lu X., Yan K. Unleashing the dynamic and nonlinear relation-ship among new-type urbanization, foreign direct investment, and inclusive green growth in China: an environmental sustain-ability perspective. Environmental Science and Pollution Re-search. 2023;30(12):33287-33297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-24503-6
[50] Özkan O., Popescu I. A., Destek M. A., & Balsalobre-Lorente, D. Time-quantile impact of foreign direct investment, financial development, and financial globalisation on green growth in BRICS economies. Journal of Environmental Management. 2024;371:1-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123145
[51] Kartal M. T., Samour A., Adebayo T. S., Depren S. K. Do nuclear energy and renewable energy surge environmental quality in the United States? New insights from novel bootstrap Fourier Granger causality in quantiles approach. Progress in Nuclear Energy. 2023;155:1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2022.104509
[52] Keshavarzi A., Horry H. R., Mahmoodi S., Alibegli M. The effect of a positive health investment shock on economic growth and environmental quality in a New Keynesian mod-el. International Journal of Environmental Re-search. 2025;19(4):125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41742-025-00779-7
[53] Özbek, S. Sürdürülebilir çevre: çevre teknolojileri ve vergileri kapsamında ekonometrik bir inceleme. Bingöl Üniversitesi İk-tisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 2023;7(Prof. Dr. Muammer ERDOĞAN Anısına Kongre Özel Sayısı):63-91. https://doi.org/10.33399/biibfad.1253043
[54] Özbek, S., Şahi̇n, S. Moderating role of globalization in agri-culture–environment nexus: insights from the inverted load ca-pacity factor. Agricultural and Food Economics. 2025;13(1):73. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40100-025-00412-3
[55] Özbek, S., Oğul, B. Çevresel Kuznets Eğrisi hipotezinin geçerliliği: Türkiye üzerine ampirik bir çalışma. Akademik Araştırmalar ve Çalışmalar Dergisi (AKAD). 2022;14(26):35-46. https://doi.org/10.20990/kilisiibfakademik.1041209
[56] Ahmed Z., Asghar M. M., Malik M. N., Nawaz K. Moving towards a sustainable environment: the dynamic linkage be-tween natural resources, human capital, urbanization, economic growth, and ecological footprint in China. Resources poli-cy. 2020;67:1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101677
[57] Nathaniel S., Khan S. A. R. The nexus between urbanization, renewable energy, trade, and ecological footprint in ASEAN countries. Journal of cleaner production. 2020;272:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122709
[58] Omri A., Daly S., Rault C., Chaibi A. Financial development, environmental quality, trade and economic growth: What caus-es what in MENA countries. Energy economics. 2015;48:242-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.01.008
[59] Arrow K., Bolin B., Costanza R., Dasgupta P., Folke C., Hol-ling C. S., Pimentel D. Economic growth, carrying capacity, and the environment. Ecological economics. 1995;15(2):91-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-8009(95)00059-3
[60] Guney E., Sogut Y., Demirtas N., Koseoglu Y., Sanver C. Harmonising progress: assessing the impact of economic free-dom, economic growth, urbanisation and environmental protec-tion expenditures on load capacity in selected European Union countries. Environmental Sciences Europe. 2025;37(1):51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-025-01088-8
[61] Grossman G. M., Krueger A. B. Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. 1991;1-39. DOI 10.3386/w3914
[62] Dinda S. Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: a sur-vey. Ecological economics. 2004;49(4):431-455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.02.011
[63] Gujarati D. N., Porter D. C. Basic econometrics. McGraw-hill; 2009.
[64] Dickey D. A., Fuller W. A. Likelihood ratio statistics for auto-regressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica: Journal of The Econometric Society. 1981;1057-1072. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912517
[65] Phillips P. C., Perron P. Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika. 1988;75(2):335-346. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/75.2.335
[66] Kwiatkowski D., Phillips P. C., Schmidt P., Shin Y. Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: how sure are we that economic time series have a unit root?. Journal of Econometrics. 1992;54(1-3):159-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(92)90104-Y
[67] Becker R., Enders W., Lee J. A stationarity test in the presence of an unknown number of smooth breaks. Journal of Time Se-ries Analysis. 2006;27(3):381-409. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9892.2006.00478.x
[68] Pesaran M. H., Shin Y., Smith R. J. Bounds testing approach-es to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics. 2001;16(3):289-326. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.616
[69] Sam Y. C., Mcnown R., Goh S. K. An augmented autoregres-sive distributed lag bounds test for cointegration. Economic Modelling. 2019;80:130-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.07.069
[70] Narayan P. K. The saving and investment nexus for China: evidence from cointegration tests. Applied Economics. 2005;37(17):1979-1990. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840500278103
[71] Park J.Y. Canonical Cointegrating Regressions. Econometrica,. 1992;60(1):119-143. https://doi.org/10.2307/2951679
[72] Stock J. H., Watson M. W. A Simple Estimator of Cointegrat-ing Vectors in Higher Order Integrated Systems. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society. 1993;61(4):783-820. https://doi.org/10.2307/2951763
[73] Perron P. The great crash, the oil price shock, and the unit root hypothesis. Econometrica: journal of the Econometric Society. 1989;1361-1401. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913712
[74] Nazlioglu S., Lee J., Tieslau M., Karul C., You Y. Smooth structural changes and common factors in nonstationary panel data: an analysis of healthcare expenditures. Econometric Re-views. 2023;42(1),78-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/07474938.2022.2156740
[75] Naimoğlu, M., Sahabi, A. M., Özbek, S. Macaristan ekonomisinde enerji verimliliğini etkileyen faktörlerin Fourier ADL eşbütünleşme yaklaşımıyla belirlenmesi. Sosyoekonomi. 2022;30(53):487-507. https://doi.org/10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2022.03.24
[76] Manavgat G., Demirci A. Lojistik performans endeksi tutar-lılığının sıralı lojistik regresyon modeliyle incelenmesi. Yaşar Üniversitesi e-dergisi. 2021;16(64):1856-1871. https://doi.org/10.19168/jyasar.934418
[77] Hansen B.E., Phillips P.C.B. Estimation and Inference in Models of Cointegration: A Simulation Study. Cowles Foun-dation Discussion Papers. 1988;1125. https://elischolar.library.yale.edu/cowles-discussion-paper-series/1125 (10.06.2025)
[78] Global Footprint Network, 2024.
[79] WDI, 2024. World development indicators. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators (12.05.2025).
[80] Jamadar, N., Jamadar, S. Comparative analysis of multi-objective and multi-verse optimization for energy management in electric vehicles. International journal of automotive science and technology. 2025;9(3):397-408. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech..1711318
[81] Kılıç, B., Arabacı, E. Performance and environmental assess-ment of hybrid electric vehicle with power-split device under quasi-realistic operating conditions. International journal of au-tomotive science and technology. 2025;9(3):427-435. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech..1740799
[82] Nassar, M., Polat, K., Koçlu, Y., Topaç, M. M. Design and optimisation of a double wishbone independent suspension system for an L6 electric vehicle: a response surface methodol-ogy based design application. Engineering perspective. 2025;4(1):21-30. https://doi.org/10.29228/eng.pers.79569
[83] Bousseksou, M. O., Nouri, K., Bartoli, T., Bouzidi, W., Bes-sais, L. Magnetocaloric cooling for hybrid/hydrogen and elec-tric vehicle cabin and powertrain components. Engineering per-spective. 2025;4(1):9-20. https://doi.org/10.29228/eng.pers.77695

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Hybrid and Electric Vehicles and Powertrains

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

İpek Gürsoy ^*
0000-0002-6409-7177
Türkiye

Sefa Özbek
0000-0002-1043-2056
Türkiye

Publication Date

December 31, 2025

Submission Date

August 14, 2025

Acceptance Date

December 14, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 9 Number: 4

DOI

https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech..1765276

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA64ZA22DU

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Gürsoy, İ., & Özbek, S. (2025). Sustainable Transportation and Environmental Quality in Germany: Quantitative Evidence on the Role of International Logistics, Trade, and Investment. International Journal of Automotive Science And Technology, 9(4), 588-601. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech..1765276

AMA

1.Gürsoy İ, Özbek S. Sustainable Transportation and Environmental Quality in Germany: Quantitative Evidence on the Role of International Logistics, Trade, and Investment. IJASTECH. 2025;9(4):588-601. doi:10.30939/ijastech.1765276

Chicago

Gürsoy, İpek, and Sefa Özbek. 2025. “Sustainable Transportation and Environmental Quality in Germany: Quantitative Evidence on the Role of International Logistics, Trade, and Investment”. International Journal of Automotive Science And Technology 9 (4): 588-601. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech. 1765276.

EndNote

Gürsoy İ, Özbek S (December 1, 2025) Sustainable Transportation and Environmental Quality in Germany: Quantitative Evidence on the Role of International Logistics, Trade, and Investment. International Journal of Automotive Science And Technology 9 4 588–601.

IEEE

[1]İ. Gürsoy and S. Özbek, “Sustainable Transportation and Environmental Quality in Germany: Quantitative Evidence on the Role of International Logistics, Trade, and Investment”, IJASTECH, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 588–601, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.30939/ijastech..1765276.

ISNAD

Gürsoy, İpek - Özbek, Sefa. “Sustainable Transportation and Environmental Quality in Germany: Quantitative Evidence on the Role of International Logistics, Trade, and Investment”. International Journal of Automotive Science And Technology 9/4 (December 1, 2025): 588-601. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech. 1765276.

JAMA

1.Gürsoy İ, Özbek S. Sustainable Transportation and Environmental Quality in Germany: Quantitative Evidence on the Role of International Logistics, Trade, and Investment. IJASTECH. 2025;9:588–601.

MLA

Gürsoy, İpek, and Sefa Özbek. “Sustainable Transportation and Environmental Quality in Germany: Quantitative Evidence on the Role of International Logistics, Trade, and Investment”. International Journal of Automotive Science And Technology, vol. 9, no. 4, Dec. 2025, pp. 588-01, doi:10.30939/ijastech. 1765276.

Vancouver

1.İpek Gürsoy, Sefa Özbek. Sustainable Transportation and Environmental Quality in Germany: Quantitative Evidence on the Role of International Logistics, Trade, and Investment. IJASTECH. 2025 Dec. 1;9(4):588-601. doi:10.30939/ijastech. 1765276